THE DARK SIDE IS LOSING ! The original Author and Specialist on Reverse Speech answers your question on this thread!!!!

Now here we go, this remote viewer basically says the same as Dimitri concluded from his analysis and even the trime frame is the same namely March, and yeah he describes it as a completely unknown and strange energy too:

REMOTE VIEWER: GALACTIC WAVE ARRIVING IN MARCH?
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.remoteviewer.nu]

Space-Time Distortion
842 Reads Printer-friendly page Send this story to someone
Posted by: ID_2025 on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 - 07:48 AM


Remote Seer I call it "the wall", but I don't know what this is. When I look at the phenomenon we are approaching, that is the description that comes into my mind. We are headed for something - and it is approaching fast. At high speed. I am told it will be like running into a wall. We are going to hit it. Like a heavy wall of energy. This is more like a time related event, with physical symptoms. When we hit it, this will slow us down and then we will pass through it.

I am not sure if this is related to black-holes. I don't know what this is. I say this, because black holes distort space-time, and we don't know how far that effect radiates from the core.

If space-time related worm holes radiate out of a black hole then we may be passing through one of those connecting threads. The only impression I get is like "bump", the solar system slams into it and passes through it. To the size of the universe the thread is very thin. From where we stand the thread is massive.

Now certain events may have been timed to coincide with hitting through this space-time vortex. The energy in there is somewhat dense. Maybe, like a tornado, but not made of anything we know. I see us hitting that wall and then passing through it to the other side. In terms of the universe this will take a nano-second. But in terms of where we are, it may take weeks to pass through. If I am not mistaken, that will happen in March and may continue through April. Already we will know across this whole planet that we are in a time of massive changes. How we respond to those changes will effect us. This is very important to understand. Our response to events is what alters our reality, not the event itself.

If any of you are interested in the Art of Remote Viewing. The way you use your mind during an event is more important that the event itself. A Remote Viewer is an individual whose mind does not just flop around like an empty bottle in the middle of the ocean. A Remote Viewer can enter the sub-atomic structure of the ocean and direct its course. This is almost impossible to understand unless you understand Zen or the martial arts. That is, the way of no resistance. When you are one with the choppy sea, the waves cannot harm you, but you can alter the wave.

I think people on earth are too attached to a rigid system of beliefs and a rigid ego that does not move, does not bend, is not fluid and so it breaks easily. Most of the people are like glasses stacked on the shelves of society. So when the earth hits this heavy field many of the glasses can crack or break, because this is a frequency wave. We humans have forgotten "The Way". It is the ego that will crack or break. As our societies are founded on the way of the ego, that could potentially create a big mess on this planet.

If people could teach themselves to be the wave and to pass out of or beyond the ego, there would be a revolution in consciousness on this planet. I think the vortex wall is a challenge to change.

Next hint:

ESA, Germany
User ID: 197619
2/18/2007 4:00 PM

Tsunami from outer space: Please prepare yourselves for unimaginable destruction in the weeks ahead
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

I'm getting a message. Stand by. It is speaking to me. The message says there will be no killer storms from space this year. No unimaginable destruction. In fact it says that by the end of March this bulletin board will still exist and we will all be here predicting the next date of destruction having learned no lessons from our past wrong predictions.

This is my prediction from the voices that speak to me.

Reversals I have been doing indicate that things are on us. Got a good one ( not naming who as even this may endanger him)) from a very qualified man, who barely mentioned forward that there was a strange body heading this way. In reverse he said much more.


“Yeh c’mon, higher worth, yeh I admits this, show us, so I connectin you up, doing it, must”

"She nears, while there's no time"


Timing of pass by has also come in on reversals...AUGUST but of course it should be seen before that. We shall see.

If this is true then I expect an Israeli kick off with Iran 5th March ( my deduced date )...followed by seemingly unconnected natural events (earthquakes, volcanoes etc) which initially will be triggered though followed by natural stuff. Much increase in UFO activity leading up to May when the SHTF.

PS> I suggest you do not get involved with what Art Bell is doing re the UFO's. It is dangerous. Not free to post all the evidence I have on that, but it includes people having strange dreams with Et's appearing and talking to them. Don't get involved at this time.

Tell me, when these predictions of yours don't happen (which they won't) will you then admit that your methods are flawed? Personally I dont think you have either the guts to, or the ability of introspection.

I betcha I'm the one who is right on this occasion. We will know on March 6th when your first date doesnt happen and you dont come on the board to admit your mistake.

The "cheque is in the mail", Watcher.

It may not come today, or tomorrow, but it's coming.

The point is, the "cheque is in the mail".

I like your analogy. The check is in mail is the standard line conmen use when they are trying to pull a scam, or people dodging debt collectors. We all know the check will never come.

And even now, before the alledged event, you are making excuses for why it didnt happen. Sorry, got the date wrong but dont worry it will happen.

The check is in the mail indeed.

Well, let's try this one:

Can't see the forest for the trees.

I would say that's an excellent analogy for Dimitri based on the very few reversals he has posted so far. He's so busy trying to make every syllable in reverse make sense, ie: counting the trees, that he's missing the real reversals, or the forest, that is before his very eyes.

Of course this is only an approximation because he hasn't posted enough reversals yet to work out exactly what he is doing.

Dimitri, you havent responded to this post yet which has come from one of your fellow researchers. He raises a very valid concern.

And while I'm on the topic of not answering questions, why is this thread entitled "The original Author and Specialist on Reverse Speech answers your question on this thread!!!!" It seems to me you are very reluctant to answer questions because sometimes they have to asked 2-3 times before you will respond. Why is this?

This is another dishonest statement in the thread's name.

Dimitri, you havent responded to this post yet which has come from one of your fellow researchers. He raises a very valid concern.

And while I'm on the topic of not answering questions, why is this thread entitled "The original Author and Specialist on Reverse Speech answers your question on this thread!!!!" It seems to me you are very reluctant to answer questions because sometimes they have to asked 2-3 times before you will respond. Why is this?

I think it is probably better to try to make out as many trees as you can instead of selecting one reversal and presenting a much more imaginative intrepretation based on that one lone reversal than what would have been attained by coloring the intrepretation in with all of the reversals albiet some less clear than the one out of context.

Also, we do not all hear the same thing on the same words. This fact alone blows your checkpoints out of the forest. It is one fact that illustrates that the nature of reverse speech is NOT in all cases what you are out to prove it is.

Just because I don't hear what someone else does does not mean that either of us is wrong in what we hear. And refusal to examine this fact won't make it disappear.

Not interested in convincing anybody Watcher, whereas you have a very big interest in making sure few believe as possible. Nor am I answering anything I have answered before on this thread. Those I work with wish to remain in the background. Anyone who does what we do can hear it all for themselves and knows what you are up to.

Here's a perfect example of what I mean by taking reversals out of context and using them to fit into the picture you have already colored in in your mind. The following two reversals were obtained by a certified RS practitioner:

[link to www.geocities.com]

[link to www.geocities.com]

In the first example the practitioner says the reversal is "white owl wisdom". I forget what cotton-candy interpretation she gave to this one, but by just going to Oate's metaphor dictionary we see that the owl represents only earthly wisdom, not spiritual wisdom. I thought the reversal was closer to "white out wisdom" (as in WITE-OUT--the correction stuff we used to use when typing), a Blakean concept relating to reading white as opposed to reading black (which is actually how we read black on a white page--we read the white, not the black/Blake), seeing only the white angelic side of the good and evil of the division of what was originally balanced pairs.

For the second example she translates part of it as some fuzzy-wooly summer nonsense that I don't now recall. Anyone with ears to hear can hear something else. If I get the time I'll try to find her translations. What I hear in this one is closer to "cause you're able to summon wolf (? ?) my rabbit does nothing". In the reversal the emotion in the voice should be enough to tell the listener that what is going on ain't no good thing here.

They lay their money down and take their chances--but is using hypnosis to restructure the mental images a good thing if this is a fair example of what these RS practitioners are doing?

This one paragraph totally illustrates my point! If not all people hear the same thing then surely that puts Reverse Speech in the same category as seeing pictures in clouds. And I totally agree. Refusal to analyse that fact WONT make it disappear. It totally invalidates anything you are trying to prove. If different people hear different things in the same section of sound track then how can RS be reliable? The results all depend on the person doing the analysing.

Just imagine a criminal investigation where two analysts do the same tape. One person hears the man is guilty and another person hears the person is innocent. That makes anything you find to be totally unreliable.

I cannot understand why you can't see this huge flaw in your theory.

You still didnt answer my question. Why am I not surprised? You, sir, are a charlatan refusing to answer very pertinent points. What do you have to say about this post from a person who was in your very own group? He raised a very valid concern and twice you have ignored it.

Ah, but not so fast...there's a bit of a conundrum here. There is more to this than just people hearing different things. Instead, the fact that people hear different things can validate reverse speech. If you have ever compared reversals between different people you might notice something else is happening.

Can you explain to me how different people hearing different things on the same section of tape validate reverse speech?

Did it again. The above was me.

So you've never compared reversals. Do you do any reversing on your own?

Dont ask me a question without first answering the question I posed to you. I dont know why you people have so much trouble answering simple basic questions.

My question was valid. If you do no reversing on you own I don't feel obligated to answer your question. Stick with TV and the grocery store. Reverse speech isn't the place for those seeking instant gratification.

I have already stated on this forum that I have been doing reverse speech for 15 years, having taken David Oates's class in Dallas in 1992. Now answer my quesion. How does different people hearing different things on the same section of tape validate reverse speech?

So while you were in this class did you ever notice how your own reversals compared to the other student's reversals--I'm assuming you on occasion reversed the same material, of course.

I'm not losing!

Answer my question first

Watcher, I have decided not to answer your question. Also, reverse speech can be proven in an intirely different manner but I will keep that to myself too.