BREAKING: Judge says Glenn Beck must identify his sources on Boston Marathon Bombing - First Amendment showdown has begun.

Hyperbole.

Yet you aren't bright enough to not quote the offending material in toto...

You now have broken the less than 50% rule...

I will fix it. Thanks for reminding me. I do get confused sometimes.

Max, if you are viewing this, I got confused. I had to remove your posts to prevent copyright violation, but I need those links back.

They were great posts...just needed to be lessened to 50%.

Maybe he can ask for help from Trump. Oh wait....

My apologies for posting the entire article...

here's the links and post as you see fit:

Becks post in 2013 on the Blaze. I remember this being a hot topic of discussion in the work place:

[link to www.theblaze.com]

Washington post ignoring Beck's facts and addressing the defamtion lawsuit in 2014:

[link to www.washingtonpost.com (secure)]

Here is another important link. This all centers around the 212 3B designation and the removal of such...

[link to www.rightwingwatch.org]

Last Edited by MaximusRex on 08/10/2016 11:53 AM

You are a great guy. Will you be my buddy!

Of course... I'm just the seeker of the truth-- even if that hurts! LOL In this case Beck may be in trouble over the 212 3B comments, but there is a LOT that remains unanswered regarding this issue. I do recall drudge ran with these headlines as well, so its not like Beck and the Blaze was the only ones promoting this line of thought.

As matter of fact the story ran right here on drudge on the left side. When you check that link you will see there is NO NO NO mention of Glenn Beck in that Infowars article.. Interesting how Beck was the sole person that was sued for this..

[link to www.drudgereportarchives.com]

Last Edited by MaximusRex on 08/10/2016 12:23 PM

No one trusts this wet crying little shit. Put that in your report.

It is going to be very interesting to see what happens...what Beck does. I feel he has no choice but not to divulge his sources. I will have newfound respect for him if he does not.

Now, that is very strange indeed.

It was widely reported that he was questioned and looked at closely... and CLEARED. It was Beck who insisted that he was really involved and he only doubled down from there.

Beck did NOT break this story... The truth may be that he simply read Drudge, or Breitbart or Infowars... and then took it a step further and tried to get credibility by claiming he had his own secret sources.

Maybe he wanted everyone to think he had some special connection to the government and the investigation and was getting inside information.

Then, the guy was cleared, and Beck was screwed...

So he acts like he is a Journalist and hides behind the constitution... not because he has any real convictions about it, but because he wants to save face.

The Judge is right... Beck can disclose this information, if he has it and is telling the truth, to the courts and the defendant and it can be kept out of the public view.

What the Judge should have done was to tell Glen that either he produces bona fide witnesses IN court, to back-up his PUBLIC accusations/claims, or the Judge would/will rule in favor of the person claiming Glen defamed them.

You don't make defaming or potentially defaming PUBLIC accusations about ANYONE, without having the proper PROOF readily available, to back-up your PUBLIC accusations/claims. PLAIN-and-SIMPLE!

It sounds like Glen is FUCKED!

Ribbit

True to an extent. I believe April 24th he dropped the story on the 212 3B after an interview he had with someone on his show.. but still 2 days before Drudge was running headlines pointing suspicion to the saudi... Why aren't they going after Matt Drudge?

April 22..
[link to www.drudgereportarchives.com]

I feel for Beck, it's a hard situation, but isn't it ironic? I mean, look at the fact that his talking may label him as a "talker", meaning no one would trust him. Yet, how many "journalists" on CNN, MSCNB, ABC, CBS, Fox, etc., can anyone really call trustworthy now?

So Beck talks, he destroys potentially his radio career. But reporters on these other channels constantly lie (wikileaks, anyone?) and it's "all good." Massive double standards.

it couldn't happen to a better cheeto puff

Exactly.