POLL: Why the small turnouts at Clintons events, while Trumps crowds are YUGE if the "Polls are Tied"?

From green screens to all out Photoshop fakery, they have tried to cover up the low turnouts at her events.

At the same time, the MSM has refused to pan their cameras at the Trump events for fear of showing just how massive his crowds of supporters are.

What say you Deplorables?

How many go to Trump rallies for "the show"?

I think Trump's rally success is mighty impressive don't get me wrong. I'm sure his supporters will get out and vote in large numbers too.

But in all honesty, are his rallies even broadcast live and watched by millions?

I think its obvious now that the rallies are not helping Trump's outreach to the extra voters he is going to need.

His rallies are not changing the polls at all. But hey, the polls are rigged and he already has all the support he needs.

Hahaha, you contradict yourself there.

I am trying to make sense of your words here, but it is a mixed statement.

Either way, it is absurd to state that they are going "for the show". Sounds very shill to me, as well as poorly thought out. These events are a MASSIVE show of support to counter the MSM narrative that we all know exists.

Thanks! :-)

I honestly believe the MSM is cooking the poll numbers.

CNN fucked up once by panning beyond the camera stops showing basically a "EMPTY" hall. There was a black curtain (As a CGI/REAL border) in front of the stage and most likely Hillary was shot somewhere else in front of a green screen and then added to a "Rent-a-Crowd" live on air. Live CGI broadcasting was "Perfected" on 9/11, planes into buildings, yeh right!
You are correct in that they use fakery on Clinton, but it isnt Photoshop it is video fakery (most likely Adobe After Effects or Adobe Premiere!

Me too.

Attending a rally is pointless. Modern times people watch from televisions or stream online.

The majority of people will vote hillary statistically.

In order to pull off voter fraud without alerting everyone to obvious discrepancies, believe they will gradually tweak the numbers of the polls.

And it has to be exposed with new polls and everyone participating who can.

Yep... Not great though, LOL

Who knows how many people are watching the live streams of Trump's rallies, and watching the replays, when youtube has a history of messing with the number of views on certain topics? Plus there are so many different choices of streams to watch, you have to add up all the numbers from the different channels.

All I know is I have made a point of avoiding any media presentation of any politician since the early nineties, I could sort of stand the sound of Bill Clinton's voice, which was about all I ever had to say about him at the time, but before that and since then I didn't want to be exposed to the sound or sight of any politician or President speaking -

Until Donald Trump - now I have enjoyed watching many of his speeches and rallies, he's the only person in public life that is actually talking about issues that affect me, a low income working person that had been a victim of street crime.

Seems like politicians and media people have some kind of rule where they aren't allowed to bring up the subject of how crime affects the inner city economy and oppresses the law abiding citizens that have to live with it.

There's this vacuum where you're supposed to pretend it's not happening, while it gets steadily worse.

Thank you Donald Trump for speaking on behalf of people who are affected by rampant street crime in our cities. I moved across country to get away from it.

There are a lot of people in this country living very sheltered lives who refuse to look reality in the face.

Agreed. Even with how badly Obama has been as a POTUS, I saw support for him everywhere in 2012.

I'm in Crook County, Ill-annoy and I see very few political signs/stickers anywhere this election cycle. And in all honesty, I'd have to say the ratio is 1:1 at this point.

The woman has over forty years of baggage, its not surprising that she gets little support.

Of course its a contridiction! Thats the point!

And stop with this latest PC word SHILL. I've watched just about every Trump rally speech and have been anti-globalist whilst Trump was still a TV celeb! I'm totally pro Trump.

Your Q is a contridiction - I thought that was your point!

I have traveled over 6k miles through the USA over the past several weeks. We have been watching for political signs. In the eastern half of the US we have been seeing Trump signs over Hillary's by 40 to 1 or better. Trumps signs everywhere, very few Clinton signs.

Shill is not a PC word.

And it did sound shilly. You can say you watch them, great. But saying others go to the rallies for the show is absurd.

They are their to show support. To be SEEN showing support.
To counter the BS narrative.

Glad you are Pro Trump.

Last Edited by The Pale Horse Jockey on 10/12/2016 09:05 AM

Trump's supporters are enthusiastic.

Clinton's supporters are reluctant.

Clinton supporters are also largely MEDICATED.

86% so far say Trump is winning, polls are BS.

Lol probably true

Trump seems to do best when his back is against the wall. I have a feeling this thing ain't over yet.

Democrats can barely make themselves get out of bed much less attend an event.

PAY ATTENTION TO BIDEN'S "POLLS"
IT WILL BE "BIDEN BEATING TRUMP IN A LANDSLIDE" AGAIN. BIDEN=HITLERY CLINTOOON