RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 4 (1193 new emails) Part 5 just released! 1:15pm EST (673 new emails)

dont quite understand this one why would they be worried if it was everything


Re: Subpoena Issuance

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: >

Just for clarity: this House subpoena is just for Libya, right? > We were discussing releasing everything, no?

> > > > On Mar 4, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Cheryl Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > >

can we implement this in the next hour?

>> Not as flippantly, and maybe just from Nick's mouth -- but rather than >> going around and around on how to release the 55k, let's just be for what's >> happening and use this as the excuse. Because we can say even if State has >> equities, not providing them would put her in legal jeopardy. OR, we say >> happy for them to have it, happy for the public to read them as soon as >> State is comforrtable. But let's somehow take advantage of this.

Not sure anybody understand the SCOPE of the subversion going on here!!!

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

They pulled the media materials because they were getting into Constitutional TROUBLE!!! So, they replaced the mgmt and materials and marched on under a different label....

We have been in a PSYOP battle this whole time!

MoveOn Org [SOROS] same thing!

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

this is possible the most important mail ever, as it talks about countries excluded from the Iranian sanctions. why would she fight for it, that China can continue dealing with Iran, but exclude the US?????!!!!!!!


In addition, while the administration claimed in 2013 that terrorism
was on the decline, the spread of the Islamic State, Boko Haram
(which Clinton refused to put on the State Department’s terrorism list
in 2011, despite requests from the Justice Department and the CIA)
and other groups since then makes the victory laps of the first term
look far too self-congratulatory.

Podesta avoided mentioning several other diplomatic initiatives Clinton
led that turned out poorly. She was a major proponent of the U.S.-led
intervention in Libya in 2011, which has led to bloody chaos and a new
bridgehead for the Islamic State. Her State Department led a failed
diplomatic effort between Israel and the Palestinians. Her officials
held years of talks with the Taliban that never bore fruit. She tried
to build a moderate Syrian opposition. None of these are going to help
her case that she deserves the Oval Office.

because of the sable rattling with the russians, my search term was Sergei Lavrov, just for info

Here's an interesting one..

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

#4694

From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-10-01 21:19 Subject: RE: Benghazi - paid media update

I am for IA and NH. I know the boss wants a national cable buy to reach the inside the beltway types, press and donors. But press will hate this. We will lose ground with them because of it. (I am still for doing it). Actual voters should see and see before the hearing.

*From:* Robby Mook [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 1, 2015 7:17 PM
*To:* Oren Shur <[email protected]>
*Cc:* John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri <
[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: Benghazi - paid media update

Let's def discuss when we review scripts but I think we gotta do this in IA and Nh. Our thesis is that our stuff doesn't cut through as well because it doesn't intersect w the crap they hear about her on the news. I feel like this is the kinda stuff we need to do to actually move numbers right now. At least worth trying this month. If numbers don't move then we can go back to plan A.

On Oct 1, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Oren Shur <[email protected]> wrote:

Just wanted to send a quick update on where we are following today’s HRC call: Ø All three TV firms are script writing, we’ll review drafts tomorrow afternoon. Research had pulled for us some of our best news clips. The trick, of course, is to connect Benghazi to emails in a way that’s credible. But we discussed different ways to do it. Ø

The difficult part here is testing – if we want to ship something early next week, our testing options are very limited, and I feel like we really need to understand whether voters will believe that we can credibly conflate Benghazi and emails. But we do have groups tonight and tomorrow afternoon – so tonight, we’re testing some video clips tonight in the groups and this spot that the digital team mocked up: [link to app.frame.io (secure)] Ø GMMB is working on a more polished spot for tomorrow afternoon’s groups.

Looking ahead to next week, I think we still need to resolve whether this is limited to a national cable buy or whether we’re really going into IA and NH with this (currently mixed opinions on team). To do the latter, we’d be pulling other spots off the air before otherwise planned. Please let me know if you’d like to further discuss any of this. Oren

Last Edited by Dace on 10/12/2016 09:37 AM

And now that we know that SOROS and SANDLERS were buddies and even see Podesta linked in earlier then some articles are showing that "when" SOROS came out of retirement prior to the banking crisis is very telling given they POSITIONED THEMSELVES!

just look at the who brokered the Wachovia deal ...

Sandlers & Soros started the CAP funding in 2003 RIGHT IN FRONT OF SPY MUSEUM! And, Hillary lays down a [what should be] famous QUOTE! that her and the left CONTINUE to repeat.... "war....

Last Edited by abalienari_non_possunt® on 10/12/2016 09:39 AM

Malcolm Nance claimed they were fake. Podesta wouldn't say one way or another, but basically said Russia is hacking him to help Trump and the FBI is investigating.

Nance is full of it.

And I think you will see some emails hit the web that are doctored. But it will be to discredit Wikileaks.

Don't believe what is said to you verify it on the Wikileaks site.

Pay for Play !! The Clintons must fall

Make this viral!

Some of these need to be their own threads.

subversion into the FBI reaches back to Podesta so of course he would try to spin it! they have their tentacles all the way in!

I suspect they have reps here/r3ddit& others daily spinning agenda and trying to "shape" and mold ideas ...talking points, etc... now that i uncovered their "intent"

Grassley letter

From:[email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2015-07-03 12:18
Subject: Grassley letter


Putting on all of your radars that Grassley sent a letter to AG Lynch (dated June 30th though we just saw it) asking questions about contributions to the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One deal. Letter is attached. Craig is connecting with comms team to be sure they are aware as well.

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

It's all one big ass story that ties together. I need to substantiate it with more facts but the timeline is way way too telling!

proof is in Dump 1-3 thus far.

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Philip Rucker (7/7/15, 5:25 pm) - Very good @brikeilarcnn interview of Hillary. Tough questions, serious issues. But also served up dessert like woman on $10 bill

So is Obama sending emails under alas? The following is from wikileaks auto 5 minute,email dumps with someone saying as President I will override Congress to keep the refugees from being deported.

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-05-05 00:50 Subject: Re: Immigration remarks

Sorry - I missed the next graf. I would still be more comfortable if we moved "we can/must" to after the next grafs. I don't want to be playing catchup in explaining the policy. > On May 4, 2015, at 10:16 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Joel and Jim. Updated attached. A little shorter. And tightened that bite: > > So I will fight for comprehensive immigration reform and a path to citizenship for you and for families across our country. I will fight to defend the executive actions that protect Dreamers from deportation. And, if Congress refuses to act, as President I will do everything possible under the law to go even further. Parents of Dreamers and others with deep ties and contributions to our communities deserve a chance to stay. We can get this done. We must get this done. > > >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Joel Benenson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dan,

Joel Benson is Hillary's strategist. Is probably for her.

as President I will do everything possible under the law to go even further

Why is he saying .... as President I will do everything possible under the law to go even further

Rally talking points. Notice the "Dreamers" too..

She will try and say the words "As President I will" often..

Now if it was.. "As President I did"... Then we might have something. lol..

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

John -- Our voting infrastructure is little better than it was in 2000 (and may even be worse). Voting systems in 28 states were not certified by the federal Election Assistance Commission because they predate standards. 43 states use systems that are no longer even manufactured. To make matters worse, these aging machines are susceptible to freezes and crashes. This is unacceptable. We need modern, reliable machines with paper backups in case the technology malfunctions.

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

If you'll forgive a moment of shameless self-satisfaction: I've been stewing all year about how messed up so many of our voting systems are, and about how the changes since 2000 have been mostly negative (perhaps you've seen the recent stories about how electronic voting machines in Florida keep producing different tallies from the same inputs). I've also been appalled to see brazen registration-suppression efforts already launched by GOPers in Michigan, Ohio, Montana, and several Southern states. In the course of trying to pin down the truth about the Ohio 2004 vote fraud allegations, I kept running into the fact that claims about polling places are almost always his-word vs. her-word situations.

I wish..

It's Hillary Rally speech planning.

Why not copy and paste at least a paragraph with the link - people like to be able to see things at a glance and then click to the source for more info. Just posting a link with no content is lazy

Even though Bernie was a crazy dude, this shit still isn't right.

Talking about the super delegates so, they feel like they won something.
----
So here's my idea. Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary. Since the original idea was to bring our elected officials to the convention ex-officio >> ( because of the offices and the constituencies they represent), why not throw Bernie a bone and reduce the super delegates in the future to the original draft of members of the House and Senate, governors and big city mayors, eliminating the DNC members who are not State chairs or vice-Chairs. (Frankly, DNC members don't really represent constituencies anyway. I should know. I served on the DNC first as Executive Director and then as an elected member for 10 years.) >> >> So if we "give" Bernie this in the Convention's rules committee, his people will think they've "won" something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. Everyone is happy.


[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Last Edited by Deplorable BuckeyeGirl on 10/12/2016 10:24 AM

One thing is clear; they had their eyes on the land swaps out in AZ & NM

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

why?

edit: damn double post....



Last Edited by abalienari_non_possunt® on 10/12/2016 10:25 AM

Some thing flashed by my Twitter feed about Bill molesting his 3rd cousin while she was babysitting?

Anyone else see that?