WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE SUN !!!! | |
Rebecca User ID: 184673 United States 01/20/2007 09:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
px User ID: 184674 Sweden 01/20/2007 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
neti User ID: 181835 Australia 01/20/2007 09:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
al User ID: 184588 Australia 01/20/2007 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AL User ID: 184588 Australia 01/20/2007 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rebecca User ID: 184673 United States 01/20/2007 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Koza N.O.S.tra User ID: 184676 Serbia 01/20/2007 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Make up your mind guys (Planet X-ers). A planet or a dwarf. They are not the same... That is if the celestial body in question, all the hype is about, existed anyway. I' m somewhat sceptical about it, but do not totaly negate the existance of such a celestial body. If it does exist, which is a big question, it is definitely not a planet but a dwarf star and a dark one at that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56132 Canada 01/20/2007 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 183955 United States 01/20/2007 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 184678 Ireland 01/20/2007 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
e3 User ID: 184674 Sweden 01/20/2007 09:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I never know what the fuck I'm supposed to be seeing when you folks post these pics of the sun. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 184678well see the pic to the far left [link to www.lmsal.com] there is a source of light to left of the sun....in the far left uppmerost left corner....comet? planetx? |
Carlos User ID: 175272 Finland 01/20/2007 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the comet stupid...get over yourself. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 183955It never was that close to the sun, furthermore it is now no longer even close to fitting in the same picture. I have no idea what this is, I hope someone who knows about astronomy could help. And I don't mean the Zetas. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62244 United States 01/20/2007 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I never know what the fuck I'm supposed to be seeing when you folks post these pics of the sun. Quoting: e3 184674well see the pic to the far left [link to www.lmsal.com] there is a source of light to left of the sun....in the far left uppmerost left corner....comet? planetx? am I the first one to notice that THE SUN shows up dark yet this "source" shows up lumisnescent?? yet its a source of light?? lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 182452 United States 01/20/2007 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I never know what the fuck I'm supposed to be seeing when you folks post these pics of the sun. Quoting: e3 184674well see the pic to the far left [link to www.lmsal.com] there is a source of light to left of the sun....in the far left uppmerost left corner....comet? planetx? The source of light to the left of the sun is the sun. The white circle depicts a solar flare. Geessshhhh! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 179033 United States 01/20/2007 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there are no "clouds" in space to reflect the light...what ever is to the left (11 o'clock) is a SOURCE of light that is not only brighter than the sun (making it appear dull) but it is BIGGER than the sun...and casting a shadow over the SUN. The comet is alread gone behind the sun...so that is not it SWAN is also closed down, so we can't see behind the sun...but this is not a flare coming from the sun...this is something being reflect by the sun as you can see from the "strip" of pictures in the solarsoft link...starting on the 15th. No lens flare either, as lens flared are blocked by the "keyhole" on the NASA satillites... go go figure...something wicked this way comes |
neti User ID: 181835 Australia 01/20/2007 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | am I the first one to notice that THE SUN shows up dark yet this "source" shows up lumisnescent?? yet its a source of light?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62244lol The pictures are in X-ray, AC 62244, and the light on an X-ray film is caused when the atoms of the particles which are moving towards the black hole get excited through friction, and their electrons jump up an electron shell. When the electrons move back a shell from having been excited they release X-rays. That's the cause of the light to the left of the sun. It is a cloud of excited, swiftly moving particles that surround a black hole. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 179033 United States 01/20/2007 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and if it were a "flare"...where is the data to support that theory...a flare of this size would be at least an X magnitude and would have all the charts spiking... the neutron data is DELAYED by a week the SWAN data is DELAYED by a week the EIT data is taking a PASS SoHO is not even showing it the lascos are DELAYED (sometimes for days) NASA's ground charts are so fucked! the only site that is showing it is solarsoft! and you know, of course they are all using the same cameras! and the charts are not reflecting this coded ALERT Space Weather Message Code: ALTEF3 Serial Number: 1245 Issue Time: 2007 Jan 20 0502 UTC ALERT: Electron 2MeV Integral Flux exceeded 1000pfu Threshold Reached: 2007 Jan 20 0500 UTC Station: GOES12 Observed Yesterday: Yes Yesterday Maximum 2MeV Flux: 15600 pfu ****without reaching ...we read THRESHOLD REACHED and MAXIMUM FLUX |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 184144 Italy 01/20/2007 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 143458 United Kingdom 01/20/2007 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 164533 United States 01/20/2007 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 143458 United Kingdom 01/20/2007 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Some people think the sun has gone from yellow to white. What if it is not the sun but US (humans) that have changed?? Quoting: Rebecca 184673The sun is a star, in deep dark space it would be white, in Japan the land of the rising sun they always depicted it as red, the sun's colour changes due to earth's current atmosphere, so if it has gone from 'yellow' to white over the last 20 odd years it shows that it is indeed our atmosphere that has changed? |
By Jupiter User ID: 140752 Spain 01/20/2007 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Some people think the sun has gone from yellow to white. What if it is not the sun but US (humans) that have changed?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 143458The sun is a star, in deep dark space it would be white, in Japan the land of the rising sun they always depicted it as red, the sun's colour changes due to earth's current atmosphere, so if it has gone from 'yellow' to white over the last 20 odd years it shows that it is indeed our atmosphere that has changed? Good point. |
By Jupiter User ID: 140752 Spain 01/20/2007 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PRESTO FROM SIDC - RWC BELGIUM Sat Jan 20 2007, 1254 UT There is no significant activity on the Sun, and the solar activity should remain very low. The solar wind speed has slightly decreased to 600km/s, which is probably the first sign of the expected decline of this fast stream. We thus predict quiet to unsettled geomagnetic conditions for the rest of Jan.20. Thereafter, the Earth magnetosphere should return to a quiet state. |
observer User ID: 145224 United States 01/20/2007 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The questions to ask: Why did Mc-Naught comet approached the sun closer than the closest planet in the solar system (Mercury) yet this comet does not have an orbit around the sun (i.e. it has a hyperbolic orbit about it). Also if the comet came this close to the sun, why did it not get captured into the influence of sun’s gravity. Another fishy thing about this comet is that NASA did not give a diameter for this large and very visible comet (that looks round by the way). A possible answer to those questions above, like someone earlier on this thread pointed out, is that this comet evolve around another big mamma that is not too far away! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 143458 United Kingdom 01/20/2007 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ostria User ID: 184715 Greece 01/20/2007 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Duncan Kunz User ID: 184720 United States 01/20/2007 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nothing is happening to the Sun, and its color has not changed. Quoting: ThanatosShow some evidence for your claim, what is the color temperature of the Sun now versus say, fifty years ago? Those with memories which are harder to mindhack already know it, and these poor fools are probably past the point where the effects of the meme can be undone with any amount of evidence. Leave them be; they'll calm down in about three hours and move onto something else to be paranoid about. Ah, that's it! All of the scientists, engineers, and others in the whole world; all the data from photographers fifty years ago -- which show a solar color temperature of 5250 deg K -- the heliometers from that long ago -- they've all been "mind-hacked". Wht, those nasty "mind-hackers" have even snuck into my house and changed the values of my 1967 Seventh Edition of Mark's Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers table on page 12-159 dealing with color temperature of the sun to match the way it really is today after all the "chem-trails"! Imagine that! Thank goodness there are a few people on the conspiracy forums who are smart enough not to be "mind-hacked" are here to explain these things to us. Where's the EVIDENCE, Jim? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 178458 United Kingdom 01/20/2007 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nothing is happening to the Sun, and its color has not changed. Quoting: Duncan KunzShow some evidence for your claim, what is the color temperature of the Sun now versus say, fifty years ago? Those with memories which are harder to mindhack already know it, and these poor fools are probably past the point where the effects of the meme can be undone with any amount of evidence. Leave them be; they'll calm down in about three hours and move onto something else to be paranoid about. Ah, that's it! All of the scientists, engineers, and others in the whole world; all the data from photographers fifty years ago -- which show a solar color temperature of 5250 deg K -- the heliometers from that long ago -- they've all been "mind-hacked". Wht, those nasty "mind-hackers" have even snuck into my house and changed the values of my 1967 Seventh Edition of Mark's Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers table on page 12-159 dealing with color temperature of the sun to match the way it really is today after all the "chem-trails"! Imagine that! Thank goodness there are a few people on the conspiracy forums who are smart enough not to be "mind-hacked" are here to explain these things to us. How about YOU trying to explain this oddity, instead of posing as though you always know better, when you often don't. |
Duncan Kunz User ID: 184720 United States 01/20/2007 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The questions to ask: Quoting: observer 145224Why did Mc-Naught comet approached the sun closer than the closest planet in the solar system (Mercury) yet this comet does not have an orbit around the sun (i.e. it has a hyperbolic orbit about it). A lot of comets approach the Sun on a one-time (hyperbolic) orbit. Whether the orbit is hyperbolic or parabolic depends on just where in the Oort cloud they were, and what their angular velocity is. Also if the comet came this close to the sun, why did it not get captured into the influence of sun’s gravity. Quoting: observer 145224You're asking the same question, and the answer is the same as I gave above. Another fishy thing about this comet is that NASA did not give a diameter for this large and very visible comet (that looks round by the way). Quoting: observer 145224NASA doesn't do a lot of things you or I might like it to do. That doesn't mean they're hiding anything; either they didn't feel it was important enough to publish the data (since the body of the comet -- as opposed to the coma -- is not all that easy to measure unless you're right there) or they did publish it and you just didn't see it. A possible answer to those questions above, like someone earlier on this thread pointed out, is that this comet evolve [sic] around another big mamma that is not too far away! Quoting: observer 145224Yes, that is a possible answer, and so is the answer that The Little Fairies of the Dew-Drops moved the comet -- they're both bogus answers. If the comet did 'evolve' around a nother 'big mamma' out there, then how did the Sun "capture" it in the first place? Where's the EVIDENCE, Jim? |
Duncan Kunz User ID: 184720 United States 01/20/2007 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How about YOU trying to explain this oddity, instead of posing as though you always know better, when you often don't. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 178458My post was in response to the "mind-hack" post; I don't have to supply you with whatever answers you can't figure out for yourself. And I never said I "always" know better. I am honest enough to say I can think of two mistakes I have made (although the last one was in 1977). Where's the EVIDENCE, Jim? |