Breaking! NATO builds up offensive capability on borders of Russia & Belarus, Moscow to respond – MoD

Well, that's what YOU SAY. NATO says it's specifically against RUSSIA.

Where does it say that? Not on the official page of NATO:

At the Wales Summit in 2014, NATO Allies agreed to enhance the capabilities of the NATO Response Force (NRF) in order to respond to emerging security challenges posed by Russia as well as the risks emanating from the Middle East and North Africa.

like i said not just russia.

[link to www.shape.nato.int]

Wow, ignorant Netherlands.
Imagine living next to Germany:

which is militant;

which says collapse of Nazi Germany was biggest geopolitical tragedy of XX century;

which is nostalgic of Nazi military power;

which has Nazi symbols all over the country;

which is supporting nationalistic Germanic speakers and friendly neonazi organizations in all neigbouring countries and embraces them acting against their statehoods;

and if some its neighbours worry, its pumps propaganda against them constantly,calling them "Germanophobic";

which meddles in other countries affairs through all means availabe - special agencies, spies, bribes, economic blackmailing, military manoeuvers near borders

etc etc etc

Wow! What an asshole! What risks are "emanating from the Middle East" for NATO? Islamic State? 30-40K Muslims, sponsored by USA, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia?

That's bullshit and you know it. You shills have no morality!

You forgot to mention a shitload of missiles and accompanying systems that were delivered to Baltic states before those NATO troops arrived.

Oh, wait... you didn't even know those systems were delivered, did you? No wonder. No one's talking about it.

By the way, those few thousand NATO troops there are not an invasion force. Nor are they even meant to be one.

They're first strike force and they're intended to be destroyed in Russian retaliation in the first hour (more like, in the first 15 minutes) of the war... but not before they launch at least 85% of their missile load (a mix of conventional/decoy and nuclear/genuine warheads) on Russian cities.

What I find more interesting in that article is this:

"“Those actions undermine strategic stability and are forcing Russia to take reciprocal defensive measures, including some in the Western theatre,” the [Russian] defense minister said."

There was a time when Russia could've made a credible threat of "responding to" (that is, destroying) a NATO missile base near its border, and it would've got away with it if it made the threat very clear and well in advance. The rest of NATO countries would get the message that Russia was ready to go to war to protect itself and they would balk at the prospect of having their capitols wiped out in nuclear blasts. But not so anymore.

U.S. is already in full control of all NATO command structures in Europe (which is clearly visible from the statement of UK minister of defense) and it's already got its (first strike) missile systems deployed all along Russian western border. The only thing Pentagon is now waiting on is direct order from "president" Trump (a stooge put there by the CIA, which is also following somebody's orders) to commence with major U.S. troops deployment to Europe (at least 100.000 men strong), after which everything will be in place for the actual invasion to begin.

Russia, on the other hand, still has no effective defense from those (already deployed, nuclear) U.S. missile systems, and trying to "respond" to them at this point would only speed up its defeat... unless Russia hit all of them suddenly and simultaneously. But judging by the previous Russian moves, that would be like waiting for a miracle to happen. I wouldn't bet on it. Not yet, anyway. Russians are still not desperate enough, nor smart enough, to recognize what they're looking in the eyes.

The best course of action for Russia would now be to simply buy some time (at least something they are good at) to fix its defense, while keeping a close eye on those missile systems, and either wait for U.S. troops deployment to Europe (a highly unlikely, but clear and definite indication of an imminent strike, days, possibly even hours away), or any indication of increased activity around the missile systems (a weaker, hard-to-catch-on-time, but significant indication of an imminent strike, akin to reaching for a gun) and only then to strike all the targets preemptively and simultaneously.

Either way, Russians should not strike before they solve their problem of defense, one way or another, or at least, until they conclude that their problem is principally unsolvable by any means other than a preemptive strike.

P.S.
On a side note, somebody's been busy lately, broadcasting some information in the likeness of WW II radio broadcasts, that seems to indicate (truly or falsely, I can't decide) that the strike on Russia will begin on November 31st of this year... which would mean that my 3-month estimate was somewhat overly optimistic.

Either way, take this information for what it is - just some unsubstantiated gossip. Until proven otherwise, that is.

they are kissing Arabia's ass they have 3 trillion bucks they are never getting back

This buildup is plan B should Trump win the election.The globalists have a plan and a free United States isn't part of it.Make no mistake about it,one way or another our country is finished.

what pro-western shills don't want to acknowledge is the agreement between western powers and then soviet union that nato will not expand into russian sphere of influence, namely the whole eastern europe, baltic states and ukraine.

nato chose not to respect the agreement feeling that russia is powerless and can be stomped into oblivion until they stepped on a mine in ukraine, practically on russian doorstep.

that's why russia's the big bad wolf, western media gets propaganda directives directly from european commission.

and, contrary to what the western elites would like us to believe, military experts will tell you that russian military doctrine is a defensive one. the bear has no interest in , say, belgian poodle, if said belgian poodle leaves it at peace and doesn't annoy it by constant yapping.

Agreed. Stupid fucking posturing used to feed the fear machine.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What u talking about Willis? More than 85% of Russia troops drunk on vodka. Russian government couldn't get a sober military together, if they had 1 year to do it. Most of Russian government active military drunks or drunk while in active military duty. Best thing, Russian military is sleep as they do that better while in an alcoholic stupor.

And how did you come to the conclusion that Russia has no effective defense?

Suddenly Russia's air defense system has vanished?

The mighty S300 and S400 systems, praised in so many other instances, are gone?

Come on.

Surely you also know Moscow has its own ballistic missile defense system too.

Meanwhile in Europe:

And your info is?