| Users Online Now: 2,106 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 836,063 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,489,759 | Threads Today: 496 | Posts Today: 10,492 |
| 02:47 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,106 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 836,063 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,489,759 | Threads Today: 496 | Posts Today: 10,492 |
| 02:47 PM | ||
Trump Graciously Stepped Aside the as the Pursuit of the Witch of Waco Intensifies | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 62823369  Canada11/23/2016 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 60397199  Japan11/23/2016 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 56122095  United States11/23/2016 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As a highly successful CEO Trump understands the principle of delegating tasks that can be handled by those lower on the chain of command, he has more important things demanding his attention. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60397199 ELISABETH BUMILLER, Washington bureau chief: I just wanted to follow up on the question you were asked about not pursuing any investigations into Hillary Clinton. Did you mean both the email investigation and the foundation investigation — you will not pursue either one of those? TRUMP: Yeah, look, you know we’ll have people that do things but my inclination would be, for whatever power I have on the matter, is to say let’s go forward. This has been looked at for so long. Ad nauseam. Let’s go forward. And you know, you could also make the case that some good work was done in the foundation and they could have made mistakes, etc. etc. I think it’s time, I think it’s time for people to say let’s go and solve some of the problems that we have, which are massive problems and, you know, I do think that they’ve gone through a lot. I think losing is going through a lot. It was a tough, it was a very tough evening for her. I think losing is going through a lot. So, for whatever it’s worth, my, my attitude is strongly we have to go forward, we have so many different problems to solve, I don’t think we have to delve back in the past. I also think that would be a very divisive, well I think it would be very divisive, you know I’m talking about bringing together, and then they go into all sorts of stuff, I think it would be very, very divisive for the country. That's not "graciously stepping aside" That's shirking the duties the American people elected him to carry out. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 58922917 United States11/23/2016 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 56122095 United States11/23/2016 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73002077 United States11/23/2016 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As a highly successful CEO Trump understands the principle of delegating tasks that can be handled by those lower on the chain of command, he has more important things demanding his attention. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60397199 ELISABETH BUMILLER, Washington bureau chief: I just wanted to follow up on the question you were asked about not pursuing any investigations into Hillary Clinton. Did you mean both the email investigation and the foundation investigation — you will not pursue either one of those? TRUMP: Yeah, look, you know we’ll have people that do things but my inclination would be, for whatever power I have on the matter, is to say let’s go forward. This has been looked at for so long. Ad nauseam. Let’s go forward. And you know, you could also make the case that some good work was done in the foundation and they could have made mistakes, etc. etc. I think it’s time, I think it’s time for people to say let’s go and solve some of the problems that we have, which are massive problems and, you know, I do think that they’ve gone through a lot. I think losing is going through a lot. It was a tough, it was a very tough evening for her. I think losing is going through a lot. So, for whatever it’s worth, my, my attitude is strongly we have to go forward, we have so many different problems to solve, I don’t think we have to delve back in the past. I also think that would be a very divisive, well I think it would be very divisive, you know I’m talking about bringing together, and then they go into all sorts of stuff, I think it would be very, very divisive for the country. That's not "graciously stepping aside" That's shirking the duties the American people elected him to carry out. No, Trump. She hasn't gone through diddly until she has gone through paying for the crimes that they have committed. THAT WAS THE DEAL.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 60303903 United States11/23/2016 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73387421 United States11/23/2016 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As a highly successful CEO Trump understands the principle of delegating tasks that can be handled by those lower on the chain of command, he has more important things demanding his attention. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60397199 ELISABETH BUMILLER, Washington bureau chief: I just wanted to follow up on the question you were asked about not pursuing any investigations into Hillary Clinton. Did you mean both the email investigation and the foundation investigation — you will not pursue either one of those? TRUMP: Yeah, look, you know we’ll have people that do things but my inclination would be, for whatever power I have on the matter, is to say let’s go forward. This has been looked at for so long. Ad nauseam. Let’s go forward. And you know, you could also make the case that some good work was done in the foundation and they could have made mistakes, etc. etc. I think it’s time, I think it’s time for people to say let’s go and solve some of the problems that we have, which are massive problems and, you know, I do think that they’ve gone through a lot. I think losing is going through a lot. It was a tough, it was a very tough evening for her. I think losing is going through a lot. So, for whatever it’s worth, my, my attitude is strongly we have to go forward, we have so many different problems to solve, I don’t think we have to delve back in the past. I also think that would be a very divisive, well I think it would be very divisive, you know I’m talking about bringing together, and then they go into all sorts of stuff, I think it would be very, very divisive for the country. That's not "graciously stepping aside" That's shirking the duties the American people elected him to carry out. Duh, yes it is. He will not pursue anything (for whatever power I have on the matter). Jeff Session, Attorney General, will pursue it (you know we'll have people that do things). You people can't see what's in the in-between ... lol |
You'll shoot your eye out  User ID: 73477449 United States11/23/2016 07:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73387421 United States11/23/2016 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70658205 United States11/23/2016 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, being somewhat familiar with legaleze (via Common Law), I've looked at 4 definitions (go find your own) of the 'Grand Jury'. Not one of them includes a President calling one. Being somewhat familiar with NLP etc., and Persuasion, Trump just ju-jitsued any sort of leftist idiocy by side stepping the issue altogether. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62823369 By his supposed statement of 'not pursuing Hillary' he both walked away from a pedo-road mess and made himself look regal. He has no need to do anything. It is not his role. The President should not be seen sullying his old (and mostly dying seemingly) opponents. It would leave a mark upon him that would be hard to scrub off. The American Justice (or Just-us) System has enough checks and measures to ensure Trumps 'maybe statement' can be met with the full force of the Law against the Clinton's. There are routes (the FBI the DOJ and perhaps the NYPD) that do not lead to Trump. Get over this crud. Let it unfold and see. This is my line of thinking, too. My other line of thought was that Trump was threatened, say with nuking a major city/cities if he were to pursue Hillary. Let's see...keep your campaign promise, or let them nuke a major city, killing millions of people, causing the crash of the stock market and the end of our current way of living. It's a possibility. I wish the shills would stop trying to stir up the Pro-Trump people, and that the Pro-Trump people would just wait to see exactly what Trump will do instead of judging him before he takes office. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 45949145 Canada11/24/2016 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72299469  Netherlands11/24/2016 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First issue is to arrive at 20.01 with intact state and institutions filled with people who would be willing and capable to implement various polices of President Trump and wishes of American people. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 45949145 Canada11/24/2016 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Secondary issue at the moment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72299469 First issue is to arrive at 20.01 with intact state and institutions filled with people who would be willing and capable to implement various polices of President Trump and wishes of American people. For sure, I have not as of yet closed my bets. Once the Electoral College votes I will close my bets....and wring my hands with glee....20 on 1000 to 1 odds is pretty good return. |
