REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
Oops! Jill Stein Must Prove Voter Fraud In Court To Recount Pennsylvania
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
Post Content
|
Oops. Jill Stein forgot to mention to her donors that she cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania. Stein did not make the recount process clear for her donors. Her outline makes it sound as though a candidate can simply file for a recount if they raise enough funds for the filing fee. Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place. Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond reasonable doubt,” it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was “probable.” This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud. [ link to www.inquisitr.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45163553 Which judges would rule on that...FEDERAL JUDGES? Almost all the Federal Judges now on the bench were appointed by Clinton, Bush, or Obama. See what kind of trouble we're in? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73484765 Pennsylvania state election law. Pennsylvania state judge would rule.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|