Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,445 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 545,291
Pageviews Today: 699,016Threads Today: 198Posts Today: 2,413
06:10 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Oops! Jill Stein Must Prove Voter Fraud In Court To Recount Pennsylvania
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
Oops. Jill Stein forgot to mention to her donors that she cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania.
another do
Stein did not make the recount process clear for her donors. Her outline makes it sound as though a candidate can simply file for a recount if they raise enough funds for the filing fee.

Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place.

Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond reasonable doubt,” it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was “probable.” This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud.
[link to www.inquisitr.com]

tiemunch
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45163553


Which judges would rule on that...FEDERAL JUDGES? Almost all the Federal Judges now on the bench were appointed by Clinton, Bush, or Obama.
See what kind of trouble we're in?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73484765


Pennsylvania state election law. Pennsylvania state judge would rule.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP