National concealed-carry reciprocity bill headed to next Congress (Bag em and tag em danno)

Simply put, if a man or woman is allowed in public, they have the RIGHT to keep and bear arms.

One is either confined to prison, jail or mental facitlity via due process and a jury verdict or free until probable cause is proven to put them in one of those 3 places.

In the same vein as right to carry, why should California be subject to assault weapon and magazine bans while there perfectly legal in other states?

Fucking bullshit! Key words state you live in. So guys like me stuck in Jew Jersey that can get only an out of state permit are still fucked! Fucking bullshit! Nation wide gun carry that's it! 2nd ammendment for fucks sakes!ughhhh!!!

WINNING!!!

I think in Tenn. The fine for carrying is $500.00 .
I would rather pay the fine than be DEAD!

Now law suits from your attackers family may be another matter altogether?;-))sad!

Lic: At least makes folks know their guns a little better.

If you carry you should practice 2 times a week! PERIOD!
Till your VERY good with your guns...then 1 time a month should do it.;-))

Last Edited by netnut on 12/07/2016 05:40 AM

That stupid gun law ballot measure they just passed in California will be deemed unconstitutional after Trump appoints a couple of new Supreme Court Justices.

Absolutely! The Fed govt should NOT be making laws that forcibly apply to all states, regardless of whether you agree with the law or not. States rights should be left to the states to handle.

Not exactly true. Congress reserved the right to engage militias. The Constitution addresses the militia in Article I, Section 8. It states “The Congress shall have the power … To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.”

So states can appoint officers and train the militias.

Ok, so that's your view. Explain the Shall Not Be Infringed part

Last Edited by The Deplorable Ryan Cawdor on 12/07/2016 06:46 AM

The fact that theyre making a legal provision shows our governments ignoramce of its own constitution

Read the 2nd amendment, then read the 10th amendment, then slap yourself for being so stupid, then apologize to us for posting that most idiotic of posts.

The SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND IS WRITTEN AND WAS AGREED TO BY ALL STATES IN THE UNION.

There are 3 groups the Second amendment speaks of, the militia and the people.

The militia is regulated by the States, that is true.

The RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Your legal speak twisting does not change the clear and simple written law of the land.

The MILITIA is regulated well AND the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall NOT BE INFRINGED.

Read those again until you get it, cause it has not changed for over 200 years.

I guess you missed the whole Civil War part of History class.

Clearly, the Constitution(s) apply apply and agree, the Supreme Law of the Land applies to ALL forms of Governments from City all the way up to the Federal level.

While I agree the Federal Government does not enforce it, that is the Law.

You can choose to ignore the Facts (as all attorney double minded fools do) but those are the facts.