Srsly, what KIND of people believe that NASA could POSSIBLY make a live broadcast from the Moon in 1969??

So because you don't understand how it was done, it must be impossible.

you offered no actual reason it could not be done except for your personal incredulity.

Just because you believe in tooth fairy, santa claus and sweet baby jesus, it doesn't mean they are real.





So "lack of technology" is not an actual reason for you???

There's no need of fancy documentaries, elaborated websites, 2hrs youtube videos and whatnot. ONLY the real time broadcast farce blows the whole thing out of water, you can say whatever you want, you can go full retard as you please, but the moon broadcast is simply ludicrous.

You don't say what this lack of technology is though. What's the problem? Analog is ridiculously easy to transmit and receive. Even back then.

I was with you until you said you don't believe in jesus.

?

I never said I believed in those and they don't have mountains of documentation and eyewitnesses backing them up.





You never said what technology was lacking. You only gave your personal incredulity.

He doesn't know what tech would be lacking. He likely only read a hoaxie website and is just repeating it. I haven't seen a new hoax claim in years and I've yet to see one that could stand up to any scrutiny.

Whoever believes NASA did a real-time broadcast from the Moon in 1969 deserves to be mercilessly butt-probed by aliens.

TRYING TO CONVINCE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN THE MOON LANDING HORSESHIT IS LIKE WALKING INTO MECCA AND TRYING TO CONVINCE THEM THAT THERE IS NO ALLAH.

YOU'RE TALKING LOGIC WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE RELIGIOUS FANATICS. THEIR FAITH IS IN THE GOVERNMENT AND SCIENCE AND AUTHORITY AND CREDENTIALISM, NOT REALITY AND DATA.

BUT THANKS FOR THE ENTERTAINING SUBJECT, IT NEVER GETS OLD.

Actually he did...the technology based on live video/audio streaming was not available...end of story.

YOU SHOULD TELLSKYPE SINCE NO ONE CAN CHAT WITH GRANDMA WITHOUT STEPPING ALL OVER EACH OTHERSWORDS. AND THAT'S ON THE SAME PLANET HALF A CENTURY LATER.

^This

Many of them deep down realize there's major BS in the official story, pride and discomfort made them hardcore believers on the surface

The Lagrange points for satellites are much further than the moon and it includes digital processing time. The moon is closer so it is only 1.3 seconds delay without processing.

TV broadcasts weren't available? Oh wait, they were. He offered no specifics, just opinions and uninformed opinions at that.

Everything is a lie, scam, and bullshit. Start with those assumptions, and the truth will follow.

And still no evidence it couldn't be done.

Just like always, not a single hoax claim stands up to scrutiny.

Most of the delay in transmissions comes from cheap equipment and from processing and reprocessing the signal multiple times. With an analog broadcast from the moon there would be none of that.

CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT OUR ALREADY TERMINALLY FUCKED JUDICIAL SYSTEM WOULD BE LIKE IF YOUR VERSION OF LOGIC WAS THE STANDARD FOR CONVICTION?

YOUR HONOR, IN CLOSING THERE IS STILL NO EVIDENCE THAT THE OP DID NOT PLAN THE ATTACKS ON THE WTC.

I REST MY CASE.

I did...in 1969.

I swear to God this entire "we never landed on the moon" BS has got to be the most insane and inane load of crap an AC has ever espoused here on GLP - and that is saying a lot since a majority of AC's here have shit for brains.

One again, answer me this: if the moon landings were faked why then has absolutely nobody from NASA, the government, or any of the many contractors and engineers come forward to blow the lid off of this ?

That's b/c we DID land on the moon idiots!

Le genre d'idiots d'oiseaux de merde qui croiront n'importe quoi les médias principaux d'enchaînement leur dit. N'est-ce pas vrai

I'm in complete agreement with this analysis. I've also contemplated this exact reasoning many times and come to the same conclusion. We did not possess the technology to go to the moon. It was faked, 100%.

There was no delay in the broadcast either, they were chatting as if they were in the same damn room

love the southern voices

1) COMPARTMENTALIZATION

2) PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY

3) FINANCIAL REWARD

4) THREATS TO THE LIFE OF PRINCIPLES AND FAMILY MEMBERS

5) MISTAKEN SENSE OF PATRIOTIC ALLEGIANCE

CLEARLY, YOU HAVEN'T EVEN BEGUN TO THINK THIS THROUGH- NOT A BIG DEAL FOR RELIGIOUS ADHERENTS, THEY RELY ON FAITH ANYWAY, BUT IF YOU ARE GOING TO ATTEMPT TO EVEN BE MARGINALLY OBJECTIVE THEN YOUMUST CONSIDER THESE FACTORS.

HERE'S A QUESTION FOR YOU-

DO YOU TRULY BELIEVE THAT EVERY CRIME EVER COMMITTED HAS RESULTED IN THE SATISFACTORY ARREST AND PUNISHMENT OF EVERY ACTOR DUE TO BEING UNABLE TO "KEEP A SECRET"?

YOU'D HAVE TO BE RETARDED TO EVEN CONSIDER THAT. NOW, ACKNOWLEDGING THAT CRIMES OFTEN GO UNSOLVED AND UNPUNISHED BECAUSE HUMAN BEINGS CAN IN FACT "KEEP SECRETS" WHAT LEADS YOU TO BELIEVE THAT SOME HUMAN BEINGS ARE INCAPABLE OF THAT?

There WAS a delay. It was simply edited out for re-broadcast and for historical record.

God, you AC's are so damn gullible!

The simple fact that we and no other country has landed on the moon since, is pretty damming. I suppose you believe it because of the shiny tin foil... huh, or I guess you were a little tyke sitting in front of the TV? You were had.

They'll continue to lie and say there's no need to revisit or too much money, etc., because we now have the technology to prove whether they actually went or not. And, since nobody has been and there are no plans for anyone to go, you're gullibility seems to be the one in question.

LIKE I SAID EARLIER, IT'S OKAY TO BE RELIGIOUS AND HAVE FAITH IN YOUR BELIEFS WHETHER GOD OF GOVERNMENT.

WHAT YOU CANNOT DO IS TRY AND ALTER THE FACTS.

NASA CLAIMED IT WAS LIVE AND THEY STILL DO. HERE'S A LINK TO POPULAR MECHANICS EXPLAINING IT FOR THE "DAMN GULLIBLE"-

[link to www.popsci.com]

SINCE WE KNOW THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE FALSE.

MAKE OF THAT WHAT YOU WILL.