Fuckin idiots that post a 20 minute youtube video, to make a 30 second statement of facts

Cuck

yeh most of them making videos spend half of the time talking themselves up..just the facts please, leave opinion in the comment section

I can't stand the youtube fuckers 30 minutes about them and trying to be cute, with their mug on the camera.

Then you get the facts. Grrrrr

Not all of us are lazy unemployed, mouth-breathers, that have all day to watch your stupid fucking video! Try typing for fucks sake!

LoL

YouTube news people.

This ^ !!! This ^ !!! This ^ !!! This ^ !!! This ^ !!! This ^ !!!

What's even worse, is those who make a video of a text article, and then slowly scroll while trying to read, which most of the time they can't even read it properly.

I don't want to watch a video of you slowly misreading an article that I could read in half the time!

I've found if u & a few others politely ask to tighten it up a bit they will on at least half of their vids.

Bcuz it is anoying af.

This X's 1000

Yes and fuck the idiots that make threads about these 20 minute videos with no synopsis

You were baited

yup

Motherfucker. The synopsis is in the thread title.

You have to be talking about Alex Jones, but most of them seem to do it. They can't just get to the fucking point.

Like good'ol "Pastor" Lindsey Williams.

Gotta wait till the end to hear the new revelation from his "elite friends"....only to find out he wants you to buy his new DVD.

The F bomb really substantiates your point, OP.

Mom - fail.

Yeah this ac^^^ I have no probs with a 20 min vid so long as they give a summary in next post to see if it worth a watch despite it taking an hr to load!

Actually i am a perfect example as are many others who live way outside of broadband / 3g / 4g areas.... just sayin

Last Edited by curry nosher on 01/09/2017 03:41 AM

Annoying bastards self promoting weirdo freak tard fools!

Secureteam10 comes to mind

Today there was a report on the internets from Sorcha Fail that GHOSTS ATE MY DINGO!

+1

Whats even worse is the picture montage with the computer voice quoting some news article they never even link to.
It fucks up the search big time.

YouTube has proven to me that 95% of Internet poster are complete morons who can't describe water as "wet" without telling you what they had for breakfast.

Exactly. They also do not know how to edit a video. Some of these dipshits can make a 5 minute video on a TNT explosion. 4:59 minutes of talking and shaking camera before the detonation

Yeah its really fucked now totally fucked in fact.

But if they did that there wouldn't be any videos on pizzagate :/

Yep.

I can understand that some people express themselves better by speaking rather than writing (I'm just the opposite), but if you want to get your message across, you really should consider what format delivers the best punch.

Audiovisual presentation is obviously great if you've got a lot of visual information. Video clips, photos, sounds, or abstract information that needs visualization (e.g. graphs).

However, if your main content is basically prose (explaining or discussing ideas), you can't beat written text. You can quickly skim over it to get an idea if it's interesting at all, it's quick and easy to return to a particularly interesting spot, it's easy put in references and links, it consumes little space and bandwidth, and you can read it anywhere without disturbing anyone. Most important of all, you can search the text.

What I find bizarre is how the videos with maybe 2-5 minutes of essential content are padded with 5-10 minutes of flashy intro graphics, soundtrack, scrolling text, and visual and sound effects that add NOTHING to the content. They serve merely as eye-candy, a distraction and a source of frustration when you're trying to find a particular spot in the video.

If you opt for a video presentation, please make sure the narration is easy to listen. Most videos I've bothered watching are narrated by a mumbling voice stumbling over the words. You've got to strain to catch the meaning. That, or they use a robotic voice for "anonymity". The horror!

Don't pad the video with useless graphics and sounds. If you've got 2-5 minutes of content, settle for that. There's no rule saying that a video has got to be 20-60 min long to be credible.

Hyperbole makes you sound like an ass. Go for a neutral tone and let the watcher draw the conclusions him/herself.

Wild gestures and moving your body a lot makes you look like a tard, too. You don't have to be stiff like a corpse, but please control your hands and don't lean in and out of the camera. There's a lot of information on the net about the body language of a good stage/video performance.

Excellent post!

I also agree that there are a lot of talking head videos out there that really should have just been written articles. Video is not always the best medium.

I personally prefer the written word. The average person speaks at a rate of about 150 words per minute, but I can read at a rate of 500 words per minute. So it's more expedient for me to read a transcript than watch a video.