Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,232 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 431,892
Pageviews Today: 656,059Threads Today: 280Posts Today: 4,277
10:44 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
01/28/2017 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Whatever. I looked at the part of the video and it is NOT showing 90 degree shadows.

So are you a flattie? You continue to show the same lack of spatial awareness they do.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
01/28/2017 06:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
...

This is an incorrect statement.
Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]

Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis?
book


 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object?

No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object.

NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


No pictures show shadows with a 90 degree sun.

you haven't shown any lies
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Liar. 3.33 to 3.53 the sun is 90 degree.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Shitty eyes dude.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
01/28/2017 08:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
...


Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object?

No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object.

NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


No pictures show shadows with a 90 degree sun.

you haven't shown any lies
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Liar. 3.33 to 3.53 the sun is 90 degree.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Shitty eyes dude.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734

Yes, your eyes are shitty. I agree.
Still doesn't show 90 degree shadows. Are all people in France blind? You can see the suits are lit from the side.
Newsboy
User ID: 59063795
United States
01/28/2017 09:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
*Recently published NASA study reveals:
Exposure to highly energetic charged particles – much like those found in the galactic cosmic rays that will bombard astronauts during extended spaceflights – caused significant long-term brain damage in test rodents.

Source: [link to www.thesun.co.uk (secure)]

* Yet none of the astronauts on lunar missions experienced brain damage or cancer as a result to their prolonged exposure to high radiation.

* Although NASA cannot figure out how to outfit astronauts to keep them alive and well while passing through the Van Allen Belt, they somehow figured out how to do it in 1969.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48553566
France
01/28/2017 09:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Back then weed was legal. NASA WERE STONED.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
01/28/2017 09:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
*Recently published NASA study reveals:
Exposure to highly energetic charged particles – much like those found in the galactic cosmic rays that will bombard astronauts during extended spaceflights – caused significant long-term brain damage in test rodents.

Source: [link to www.thesun.co.uk (secure)]

* Yet none of the astronauts on lunar missions experienced brain damage or cancer as a result to their prolonged exposure to high radiation.

* Although NASA cannot figure out how to outfit astronauts to keep them alive and well while passing through the Van Allen Belt, they somehow figured out how to do it in 1969.
 Quoting: Newsboy 59063795


Key word is EXTENDED spaceflights. A trip to the Moon lasting about a week is not extended.


This has nothing to do with the Van Allen belts but if you really want to know, Apollo went around the belts.

Due to the angle of the magnetic field and the angle of the Moon's orbit, that path is not always available. If they want to go more often and at will, and they do, then they need to have the option to go through the center. Also, that path is not available for interplanetary trips such as going to Mars.



MaybeTrollingU

User ID: 73115228
Brazil
01/28/2017 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Take a good read at this:

Figure 1 | Experimental set-up. Sources, A Ti:sapphire laser pulsed in the picosecond regime with a 76 MHz repetition rate at 780 nm pumps two
periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) bulk crystals. In one crystal, pairs of photons are generated by type II spontaneous parametric down-conversion
and separated by a polarizing beam splitter (PBS). One photon is sent through a 25 GHz filter (f) at a central wavelength of 1,563 nm, and detected in a
gated avalanche photodiode (APD) with 20% detection efficiency. The second PPLN crystal is seeded by an additional continuous-wave (c.w.) laser at
1,563 nm, generating a local oscillator (by means of pulsed coherent state) through DFG, whose bandwidth is restricted by energy conservation to the
bandwidth of the pump laser. Micro entanglement, the heralded single photon (HSP) is sent to a fibre 50/50 beam splitter, realizing an entangled state
between the two output modes A and B. The figure-8 shapes represents the entanglement between the two modes. Macro entanglement, the mode A is
then combined with the local oscillator on a unbalanced beam splitter (90/10), corresponding to a displacement operation on the HSP state. A set of black
lines represents the fact that in this mode the state can be seen as macroscopic. Analysis, the measurement set-up consists of the application, on the
mode A, of an inverse displacement operation Da(α)
−1 = Da(−α) by means of another 90/10 fibre beam splitter that closes a Mach–Zehnder
interferometer. The adjustable U-bench allows one to accurately balance the path length difference for the experimental wavelength and to stabilize the
phase on the side of the interference fringe from a reference laser (see Supplementary Information). In this interferometer, a piezo (PZT) is used to
compensate the phase fluctuations. The PZT on the mode B is used to observe single-photon interference fringes. A pair of PBSs and a half-waveplate
(HWP) are used to recombine the modes A and B (HWP at π/8) or not (HWP at 0) to access V or pij, respectively (see the main text). The two outputs are
detected by two avalanche photodiodes with 25% detection efficiency, triggered by the detection of an idler photon in the HSPs.

This is the description of ONE experiment, done to study entanglement in a macroscopic level. From this article: [link to cms.unige.ch] If you're interested into knowing what a scientific research actually is, you can find the full research paper here: [link to arxiv.org (secure)]

The first link, is the "public view" meaning that its the simplest way to explain an intrincated experiment to investigate one phenomenon, simple enough to be understood by the layman public. The full research on the research publication, contains MANY different sources wich this specific one is based on. All of them are also available to the public somewhere. If you flat earth tards would present your "research" and "studies" in such a form, with sources, experiments with detailed instructions to reproduce, results and the math proving it, then it would be somewhat credible and it might make some sense, until there, you stay in the mysticism realm, not even a hypothesis. As of now, flat earth is at the same level of investigating drag coeficient in flying carpets or different races of dragons. Pure fantasy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48553566
France
01/28/2017 10:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
01/28/2017 10:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566



AGAIN you have a long low angle shot that makes it hard to actually see the details on the shadows. But what you CAN see is the LM and the astronauts are lit up on the side facing the camera AND the shadow of the PLSS on the astronaut's legs makes it clear the sun is at an angle and NOT directly overhead.

Further, this shot comes from a much longer video of the EVA during which it is clear the sun is not directly overhead throughout and during which multiple still photos were also take which show the same.

All you've shown so far is you have low spatial reasoning.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
01/28/2017 11:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
The people who still defend the NASA moon landing as being fact are a joke.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72766322


Those are jerks. They love to push lies. So sick minded.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
02/02/2017 02:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Where is the shadow? 3.33 to 3.53

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Still lying?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
02/02/2017 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.
The Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

02/02/2017 03:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Debunk moon landing hoax, win $10,000 reward.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


And who decides if this fraud is debunk'd? Yeah that's what I thought. He does. It's a scam. He'll never admit to being debunked. It's the same scam that flat-earthers run. You can't legally force them to pay up even though they promised they would.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


You are educated scientist. Why spread lies?

They land the moon at morning time to avoid high heat.

Why shadows right under the lander and moon buggy as if the sun is over head during every mission?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734

I'm not lying. Try actually doing the math for once.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
This photo was taken at 163 hours 59 minutes 05 seconds into the flight of Apollo 15. Given a launch date and time of July 26, 1971, 13:34:00.6 UT, that means the photo was taken on August 2, 1971 at 9:33:05.6 UT. At that time, the sun should have been 38.2348 degrees above the horizon at an azimuth of 112.4502 degrees from the landing site of Apollo 15. We know the flag in the photo measured 3 feet by 5 feet. Using the 3 foot height of the flag itself, we find that the pole's visible length in the image measures about 8.5 feet. It's titled at an angle though, so its actual height above the ground is roughly 8.4 feet if we assume the photo is perfectly level. Given an expected shadow length of Height/tan(altitude of sun over horizon) we find that the shadow should be about 10.7 feet long. Again using the height of the flag itself in the photo as a reference (about 239 pixels by my measurement) I find that the shadow of the pole measures about 862 pixels or about 10.8 feet in the image. That's within a tenth of foot of the expected shadow length in spite of terrain variations and approximate methods for comparison.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut

astrobanner2
The Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

02/02/2017 03:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
3.33 to 3.55 Where is shadow? Why still lying?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Shadow cast towards camera. Accurate measurement impossible at that angle. Why you still retarded?


Try actually measuring the shadows properly when they're perpendicular to the camera and suck on the results:
I'm not lying. Try actually doing the math for once.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
This photo was taken at 163 hours 59 minutes 05 seconds into the flight of Apollo 15. Given a launch date and time of July 26, 1971, 13:34:00.6 UT, that means the photo was taken on August 2, 1971 at 9:33:05.6 UT. At that time, the sun should have been 38.2348 degrees above the horizon at an azimuth of 112.4502 degrees from the landing site of Apollo 15. We know the flag in the photo measured 3 feet by 5 feet. Using the 3 foot height of the flag itself, we find that the pole's visible length in the image measures about 8.5 feet. It's titled at an angle though, so its actual height above the ground is roughly 8.4 feet if we assume the photo is perfectly level. Given an expected shadow length of Height/tan(altitude of sun over horizon) we find that the shadow should be about 10.7 feet long. Again using the height of the flag itself in the photo as a reference (about 239 pixels by my measurement) I find that the shadow of the pole measures about 862 pixels or about 10.8 feet in the image. That's within a tenth of foot of the expected shadow length in spite of terrain variations and approximate methods for comparison.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Succccck on that... mmmmmmmhhhh.... doesn't it taste good? Tastes like my victory! Stop accusing me of lying you fucking retard.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut

astrobanner2
The Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

02/02/2017 03:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


See, I can see your cross-posting on multiple threads. I can cross-post too. Voila. Now you have to deal with epic destruction of your claim on this thread too. Suckkkk on it.

Last Edited by Dr. Deplorable Astromut on 02/02/2017 03:34 PM
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1079341
United States
02/02/2017 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1079341
United States
02/02/2017 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


See, I can see your cross-posting on multiple threads. I can cross-post too. Viola. Now you have to deal with epic destruction of your claim on this thread too. Suckkkk on it.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Lol Who is Viola?
The Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

02/02/2017 03:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


See, I can see your cross-posting on multiple threads. I can cross-post too. Viola. Now you have to deal with epic destruction of your claim on this thread too. Suckkkk on it.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Lol Who is Viola?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1079341


The woman my autocowrecktor is sleeping with. Fixed now, thanks.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1079341
United States
02/02/2017 03:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


See, I can see your cross-posting on multiple threads. I can cross-post too. Viola. Now you have to deal with epic destruction of your claim on this thread too. Suckkkk on it.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Lol Who is Viola?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1079341


Was she one of the three black women engineers from the NASA movie that's out right now?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1079341
United States
02/02/2017 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


See, I can see your cross-posting on multiple threads. I can cross-post too. Viola. Now you have to deal with epic destruction of your claim on this thread too. Suckkkk on it.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Lol Who is Viola?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1079341


The woman my autocowrecktor is sleeping with. Fixed now, thanks.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Hahahahaha ;)
Neighbor Bob
User ID: 73015540
United States
02/02/2017 03:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Trump should fund an exact replica of the ship used. Then force the head of NASA take the ride.

mash4077-salute
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
02/02/2017 03:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566


Look where is the shadow? Where is the sun? What time it should be?

May God forgive liars. Don't make them long nose. Make their cock small.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1079341
United States
02/02/2017 03:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Trump should fund an exact replica of the ship used. Then force the head of NASA take the ride.

mash4077-salute
 Quoting: Neighbor Bob 73015540


epiclol

And...

clappa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1079341
United States
02/02/2017 03:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566


Look where is the shadow? Where is the sun? What time it should be?

May God forgive liars. Don't make them long nose. Make their cock small.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
02/02/2017 03:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Trump should fund an exact replica of the ship used. Then force the head of NASA take the ride.

mash4077-salute
 Quoting: Neighbor Bob 73015540


Dr Astro should ride with him
The Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

02/02/2017 03:49 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Trump should fund an exact replica of the ship used. Then force the head of NASA take the ride.

mash4077-salute
 Quoting: Neighbor Bob 73015540


There's an unused Apollo command module, CSM-119, sitting on display at the Saturn V center at KSC. If fixed up and put on top an appropriate rocket I'd gladly fly on the thing. I'm sure the fuel plumbing, seals, and many other parts would need to be changed out though. And that's assuming the plumbing is even still in place; dangerous parts like the pyrotechnics for things like the parachutes certainly wouldn't be, so those would have to be replaced as well.

There's also an unused Lunar Module strung from the ceiling at the Saturn V center. LM-9 was an H-class lunar module (no rover) and it was originally intended as the Lunar Module for Apollo 15. It sat unused after they pushed up the schedule for switching to J class missions when the program was cut off at Apollo 17. The situation is probably much the same in terms of renovation needed to be flight worthy.

Plus there's the bigger issue that the infrastructure designed to support its launch was dismantled a long time ago. The crawler transporter is still around, but the mobile launch platform and pad is gone/renovated. The SA-514 Saturn V was unused but sat outside rotting for decades. Stages 2 and 3 are at KSC on display and stage 1 is at JSC. I doubt it could ever fly after all the corrosion it experienced while it was an outdoor display. Still, what a ride it would be.
astrobanner2
The Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

02/02/2017 03:51 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Trump should fund an exact replica of the ship used. Then force the head of NASA take the ride.

mash4077-salute
 Quoting: Neighbor Bob 73015540


Dr Astro should ride with him
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


I wouldn't want to fly with Charlie Bolden. I stumped him on an Apollo-related question (which I still feel he should have had an answer for). I probably know more about flying the Apollo command module than he does, sadly.

astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
02/02/2017 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
Where is the shadow? 3.33 to 3.53

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Not directly underneath them. AGAIN you are showing a low angle footage that makes it harder to see the shadow but you CAN see it directed toward he camera. The side of their suits closest to the camera is shaded and the other side is in sun.

Still lying?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Yes, you are.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73850734
France
02/02/2017 03:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
The people who still defend the NASA moon landing as being fact are a joke.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72766322


Those are jerks. They love to push lies. So sick minded.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Sad but true.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
02/02/2017 03:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566


Look where is the shadow? Where is the sun? What time it should be?

May God forgive liars. Don't make them long nose. Make their cock small.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73850734


Already answered. Apparently you can't read as well as you have poor spatial reasoning.

24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48553566



AGAIN you have a long low angle shot that makes it hard to actually see the details on the shadows. But what you CAN see is the LM and the astronauts are lit up on the side facing the camera AND the shadow of the PLSS on the astronaut's legs makes it clear the sun is at an angle and NOT directly overhead.

Further, this shot comes from a much longer video of the EVA during which it is clear the sun is not directly overhead throughout and during which multiple still photos were also take which show the same.

All you've shown so far is you have low spatial reasoning.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799