NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

According to NASA website info, all Apollo moon landings are done at moon's morning. The sun is about 13 degree above the horizon. Therefore if an object is 1 m tall its shadow should be over 4 m long on flat ground. I found some short shadows in every mission, here are time marks and video links, you be the judge.

3.33 look their shadows, impossible under morning sun. 3.50 the dancer's shadow shows the sun is over head. not morning sun. 3.55 the rope is waving in the wind. 4.06 shadow becomes so long, why? 4.39 his shadow shows the sun is over head.

2.56 shadows of the man and rock show the sun is over head. impossible for morning moon.

12.36 shadows show the sun is about 60 degree up. 23.31 his shadow is way too short. the sun is supposed to be like 20 degree up. 24.43 shadows are too short.to be true. 28.37 look the shadow, the sun is like 70 degree up. 39.00 the shadow is under the lander, the sun is over head. 41.03 the shadow is under the left over lander. sun is over head.

20.16 rock and people shadows are too short to be filmed on morning moon. 22.23 lander and man shadows are showing the sun is over head.

23.26 shadow is too short to be true. the moon is early morning, all shadows are very long. 26.17 the rocks and the guys have very short shadows, impossible at early morning on the moon. 29.37 the lander and the guy are under the noon sun. 29.47 the bag under the lander is waving in the wind.

15.57 look shadows all point to wrong direction. the flag is falling too.

1.23 to 1.43 why the shadow is under the buggy? the sun is above?

18.40 look their short shadows. should be very long shadows. it was early morning on the moon.

11.07 why those rocks all have very short shadows? 16.20 why their shadows are so shout? 17.36 why shadow is short and wrong direction? noon time on the moon? 21.37 moon lander has no shadow? 20.08 why they have short shadows? 22.53 look the short shadows of the lander and the guy. 8.58 why short shadow?

18.06 their shadows are too short for morning sun. 19.08 lander and the guy shadows are missing. 21.00 the shadow of the rock on the left shows the sun is about 45 degree up. too high for morning sun. 21.35 rock and guy shadows show the sun is about 60 degree up. impossible filmed at morning moon. 24.17 shadows are under lander, sun is over head. too fake. 24.24 listen to the guy.

If you care, please suggest a pin.

To this day there is an experiment that was set up on the moon by Apollo 11, a mirror array aimed at Earth: the lunar laser ranging experiment. For the last 30+ years and even today, astronomers are able to reflect a laser off this mirror and back to Earth to measure variations in the distance. That mirror had to be set up by human hands; it did not fly there on its own.

Fake moon landing is OK

Doing such shitty job is not

Too fake, dumb asses should be jailed.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Please don't swallow your dental.

OK! I never saw it before. You are so right. :p

Too bad we have many dumb brothers

They still love NASA lies

I am not kidding you.

Thread: ++ I Am In Fact Elon Musk / I Believe Reality May Be a Simulation / Ask Me A Question (Page 32)

the moon landing was filmed in canada on devon island

I highly doubt Mr Trump will ignore NASA lies

Their days are numbered

I hope Dr Astro is not going down with them. He loves NASA more than his g/f.

I never saw anywhere in Canada that looked like the moon. Tho canadians are a bit loonie.

[link to humansarefree.com]

Why quote me and link that?

you said no where in canada looks like the moon.

so you've obviously never been to canada before,
its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or

"like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like"

:bumpity:

Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards:
- Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish.
- The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others.
- Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones.
- Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in...

To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order:
- SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!!
- Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say")
- (Some generic insults)
- I don't need to be graduated to question science!
- Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong!
- Just look at the videos!

There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what.