NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

you said no where in canada looks like the moon.

so you've obviously never been to canada before,
its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or

"like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like"

A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault.

If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p

A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault.

If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

location

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Cool pics. I mean that. Why does that look like the moon to you?

I love learning about my southern neighbor.

Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards:
- Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish.
- The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others.
- Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones.
- Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in...

To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order:
- SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!!
- Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say")
- (Some generic insults)
- I don't need to be graduated to question science!
- Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong!
- Just look at the videos!

There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what.

What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization?

I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions:
- I'm nowadays working as a software developer
- There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist.
- Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar.
- NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon.

What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization?

I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions:
- I'm nowadays working as a software developer
- There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist.
- Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar.
- NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon.

I hope Dr Astro is not going down with them. He loves NASA more than his g/f.

According to NASA website info, all Apollo moon landings are done at moon's morning. The sun is about 13 degree above the horizon

This is an incorrect statement.
Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]

Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis?

Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object?

No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object.

NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool.

No pictures show shadows with a 90 degree sun.

you haven't shown any lies