NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

Whatever. I looked at the part of the video and it is NOT showing 90 degree shadows.

So are you a flattie? You continue to show the same lack of spatial awareness they do.

Shitty eyes dude.

Yes, your eyes are shitty. I agree.
Still doesn't show 90 degree shadows. Are all people in France blind? You can see the suits are lit from the side.

*Recently published NASA study reveals:
Exposure to highly energetic charged particles – much like those found in the galactic cosmic rays that will bombard astronauts during extended spaceflights – caused significant long-term brain damage in test rodents.

Source: [link to www.thesun.co.uk (secure)]

* Yet none of the astronauts on lunar missions experienced brain damage or cancer as a result to their prolonged exposure to high radiation.

* Although NASA cannot figure out how to outfit astronauts to keep them alive and well while passing through the Van Allen Belt, they somehow figured out how to do it in 1969.

Back then weed was legal. NASA WERE STONED.

Key word is EXTENDED spaceflights. A trip to the Moon lasting about a week is not extended.


This has nothing to do with the Van Allen belts but if you really want to know, Apollo went around the belts.

Due to the angle of the magnetic field and the angle of the Moon's orbit, that path is not always available. If they want to go more often and at will, and they do, then they need to have the option to go through the center. Also, that path is not available for interplanetary trips such as going to Mars.

Take a good read at this:

Figure 1 | Experimental set-up. Sources, A Ti:sapphire laser pulsed in the picosecond regime with a 76 MHz repetition rate at 780 nm pumps two
periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) bulk crystals. In one crystal, pairs of photons are generated by type II spontaneous parametric down-conversion
and separated by a polarizing beam splitter (PBS). One photon is sent through a 25 GHz filter (f) at a central wavelength of 1,563 nm, and detected in a
gated avalanche photodiode (APD) with 20% detection efficiency. The second PPLN crystal is seeded by an additional continuous-wave (c.w.) laser at
1,563 nm, generating a local oscillator (by means of pulsed coherent state) through DFG, whose bandwidth is restricted by energy conservation to the
bandwidth of the pump laser. Micro entanglement, the heralded single photon (HSP) is sent to a fibre 50/50 beam splitter, realizing an entangled state
between the two output modes A and B. The figure-8 shapes represents the entanglement between the two modes. Macro entanglement, the mode A is
then combined with the local oscillator on a unbalanced beam splitter (90/10), corresponding to a displacement operation on the HSP state. A set of black
lines represents the fact that in this mode the state can be seen as macroscopic. Analysis, the measurement set-up consists of the application, on the
mode A, of an inverse displacement operation Da(α)
−1 = Da(−α) by means of another 90/10 fibre beam splitter that closes a Mach–Zehnder
interferometer. The adjustable U-bench allows one to accurately balance the path length difference for the experimental wavelength and to stabilize the
phase on the side of the interference fringe from a reference laser (see Supplementary Information). In this interferometer, a piezo (PZT) is used to
compensate the phase fluctuations. The PZT on the mode B is used to observe single-photon interference fringes. A pair of PBSs and a half-waveplate
(HWP) are used to recombine the modes A and B (HWP at π/8) or not (HWP at 0) to access V or pij, respectively (see the main text). The two outputs are
detected by two avalanche photodiodes with 25% detection efficiency, triggered by the detection of an idler photon in the HSPs.

This is the description of ONE experiment, done to study entanglement in a macroscopic level. From this article: [link to cms.unige.ch] If you're interested into knowing what a scientific research actually is, you can find the full research paper here: [link to arxiv.org (secure)]

The first link, is the "public view" meaning that its the simplest way to explain an intrincated experiment to investigate one phenomenon, simple enough to be understood by the layman public. The full research on the research publication, contains MANY different sources wich this specific one is based on. All of them are also available to the public somewhere. If you flat earth tards would present your "research" and "studies" in such a form, with sources, experiments with detailed instructions to reproduce, results and the math proving it, then it would be somewhat credible and it might make some sense, until there, you stay in the mysticism realm, not even a hypothesis. As of now, flat earth is at the same level of investigating drag coeficient in flying carpets or different races of dragons. Pure fantasy.

24.13 Look the shadow is right under the lander, the sun is right over head. NASA lied, fact is fact.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

AGAIN you have a long low angle shot that makes it hard to actually see the details on the shadows. But what you CAN see is the LM and the astronauts are lit up on the side facing the camera AND the shadow of the PLSS on the astronaut's legs makes it clear the sun is at an angle and NOT directly overhead.

Further, this shot comes from a much longer video of the EVA during which it is clear the sun is not directly overhead throughout and during which multiple still photos were also take which show the same.

All you've shown so far is you have low spatial reasoning.

Where is the shadow? 3.33 to 3.53

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Still lying?

Please don't swallow your dental watching NASA clown show.

See, I can see your cross-posting on multiple threads. I can cross-post too. Voila. Now you have to deal with epic destruction of your claim on this thread too. Suckkkk on it.

Last Edited by Astromut on 02/02/2017 03:34 PM

Lol Who is Viola?

The woman my autocowrecktor is sleeping with. Fixed now, thanks.

Was she one of the three black women engineers from the NASA movie that's out right now?

Hahahahaha ;)

Trump should fund an exact replica of the ship used. Then force the head of NASA take the ride.

Look where is the shadow? Where is the sun? What time it should be?

May God forgive liars. Don't make them long nose. Make their cock small.

And...

Dr Astro should ride with him

There's an unused Apollo command module, CSM-119, sitting on display at the Saturn V center at KSC. If fixed up and put on top an appropriate rocket I'd gladly fly on the thing. I'm sure the fuel plumbing, seals, and many other parts would need to be changed out though. And that's assuming the plumbing is even still in place; dangerous parts like the pyrotechnics for things like the parachutes certainly wouldn't be, so those would have to be replaced as well.

There's also an unused Lunar Module strung from the ceiling at the Saturn V center. LM-9 was an H-class lunar module (no rover) and it was originally intended as the Lunar Module for Apollo 15. It sat unused after they pushed up the schedule for switching to J class missions when the program was cut off at Apollo 17. The situation is probably much the same in terms of renovation needed to be flight worthy.

Plus there's the bigger issue that the infrastructure designed to support its launch was dismantled a long time ago. The crawler transporter is still around, but the mobile launch platform and pad is gone/renovated. The SA-514 Saturn V was unused but sat outside rotting for decades. Stages 2 and 3 are at KSC on display and stage 1 is at JSC. I doubt it could ever fly after all the corrosion it experienced while it was an outdoor display. Still, what a ride it would be.

I wouldn't want to fly with Charlie Bolden. I stumped him on an Apollo-related question (which I still feel he should have had an answer for). I probably know more about flying the Apollo command module than he does, sadly.

Not directly underneath them. AGAIN you are showing a low angle footage that makes it harder to see the shadow but you CAN see it directed toward he camera. The side of their suits closest to the camera is shaded and the other side is in sun.



Yes, you are.

Sad but true.

Already answered. Apparently you can't read as well as you have poor spatial reasoning.