NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

clearly its been faked, astro shill pretends like his been there but everything he says comes from a nasa' shill book, really his as dumb as dogshit

let's see…

we have a cult of rich and powerful pagan nazi godless power-hungry corporate technocrats who name everything after the sun god…why on earth would they want everyone to believe that life on earth isn't unique? that all the scientific data shows that the earth is the center of the universe? that we can boldly go into trillions and trillions of star systems like it matters one bit? that there is a Creator of all this intelligently designed reality/consciousness?

most of Hollywood already performs this function, why can't NASA just be another hollywood blockbuster?



“A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."
--Dr. Fred Hoyle (scientist who coined the term "Big Bang" who was unafraid to go wherever the facts led him, and who consequently recanted his atheism.)

Head of Human Genome Project, Dr. Francis Collins, converts to Christianity
"I set out to prove that my atheist position was correct."

“Intelligence must have been involved...”
--Dr. Antony Flew, 2004 (speaking about DNA complexity and his new-found belief in God. Dr. Flew was the author of “Theology and Falsification”, and was the foremost atheistic scientific writer of 20th Century)

Depends on how many conversions and the type of equipment.

There is a local radio station where I live that broadcasts on both FM and AM. The AM is delayed 5-6 seconds just because of the conversion.

Did they take a big transmitter antenna up there with them? Big transmitter amplifier? How big was the camera?

No there is not a delay in any direction.

It is like listening to an ordinary phone call between 2 persons.

Try to have a conversation with your 3 second delay.
It is impossible without people interrupting each other all the time.

And also, try to find 1 clip from the moon where Houston and/or an astronaut talk at the same time.

For Apollo? They did take a large S-band antenna. IIRC they set one up on each mission.

Truth should come out. Do you like truth?

Still your burden of proof. And I'm not sure I trust you when you couldn't be bothered to read that the delay was due to analog -digital conversion until it was posted at least three times and then asked the following
"Do you mean that analog sound travels at the speed of light?

And digital sound travels at the speed of sound?"

Wow!

Is this your proof?

I am pretty sure that there are other reasons involved in that delay.

Maybe you should ask your local radio what it is?

It should be 0.0something seconds in delay.

I am close friend with many music studio producers.
I must show your replies to them.
They will have a good laugh.

Did I say it was proof? No, it is an anecdote. And it is due to the conversion because AGAIN it varies depending on the equipment and how many conversions which is why you can find ISS clips that have almost no delay.

To be honest,
I think the ISS interview is enough evidence to anyone that have listened to any of the moon conversations with Houston.

It is YOUR burden of proof now.
Your understanding of analog-digital conversion is embarrassing.

Except for you local radio station,
give a link to anything that say "analog to digital" creates more than milli-seconds of delay.

Modern DACs also operate at the speed of light ... and a 24 bit processor only needs those trons to travel about 40 nm a couple of thousand times every second ...

for the tldr crowd.

1) turn your cell phone speaker on.
2) go into settings, ring tones
2a) or your music library if you can afford music
3) press play.
4) start a stop watch
5) when you hear sound, stop the watch.
6) That is how long it takes to convert digital audio to analogue audio.

5000 degrees is how hot it got on re-entry..stainless steel melts at under 2500, melts lol not just bends n buckles but melts, at 5000 it will vapourise especially if theres air pressure on it, would be like thermite..so theres no way possible that module could withstand that re-entry without even a bend or buckle in the metal..let alone the people inside, i know they will say tiles or some kind of heatshield but thats even more ridiculous because that will mean only more friction..its impossible for so many reasons and thats why they can never duplicate this hoax, they can never go there and no shill here can prove otherwise

You are drowning in your own words.

YOU claimed the apollo conversations show no delay. YOUR burden of proof.

you showed ONE ISS interview with delay when there are others with far less. THAT is evidence enough to show that something other than distance is causing the delay.

I know from experience that analog-digital conversions can cause significant delay. There are likely other factors as well but for the ISS distance is not one of them. Yet suddenly you, who couldn't be bothered to read that part of my post the first three times and then posted this howler
"Do you mean that analog sound travels at the speed of light?

And digital sound travels at the speed of sound?"

are suddenly an expert.

There are musicians on GLP that deals with this analog-digital-delay everytime they record something.

Maybe we should ask them if you are right with 5-6 seconds delay because of this?

Maybe we should bet money on this?

What do you say?

What part of depends on the equipment and the number of conversions do you not understand? What is VERY clear is any delay to the ISS is NOT from distance like you seemed to think it was.

If you believed they put a man on the moon (man on the moon)
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool

yeh yeh yeh yeh :)

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

5000 degrees is how hot What got? What on the spacecraft reached this temperature?

...and speaking of heatshield, do you know how the CM heatshield functioned?

Yeah right, suddenly...
I have personally dealt with this analog to digital conversation since digital came into the picture.

I can promise you that you have exaggerated these numbers to possibly 1000 times more than they really are.

It is hardly hearable.

You say 5-6 seconds extra delay.

I say 5-6 milli-seconds is way closer to the truth.

So you're just going to gloss over your howler then? Thought so.

And when there are multiple conversions as well as latency from an internet connection and old equipment it can be far longer. Still definitely NOT distance like you tried to say it was.

Mixing will get varied answers. Musicians are often mixing multiple tracks. They also encode multiple output formats when they are publishing things digitally to various audiences. quality/compression

Encryption is another thing that can take processing power and delay. NASA will always be able to say they are using high end encryption to prevent the terrorists from listening in. The problem with that argument, of course, is that exactly what is lil' kim or al queada going to do with a signal from the ISS about an EVA? or that canadian dude singing terribly and playing a worse guitar in the cupalo? Exactly nothing.

The basic rule is nyquists rule. to capture 20kHz (human hearing range) you need to sample at 40kHz digital. The processor in 10 year old cheap CONSUMER cell phones run at 50+ mHz ...

They try really hard to cover up these technical discrepancies. Good for everybody. Makes us think! It is unfortunate they don't try to avoid the absolute B.S. stuff that is being talked about in the other thread.

If I went to the moon, one of the first pictures I would take is a photo of earth.

Are there any such photos?

I found one but the quality is shit.

If they have all these video feeds on the surface of the moon, why do none show the earth in the background? That would be the first thing I'd want to capture.

yeh i've read about it so i only know whats been written, do you know? i know they used avcoat 5026-39

the actual patent filing date for this is in 2009 according to google..they used a time machine to send it back 50 years maybe? i dont know...

Understand what?

You only make short replies without any ounce of fact.

The only fact you have said,
is that there will be 5-6 seconds extra delay when you convert to digital sound.

Sorry, but you seem COMPLETELY clueless.

Yet you continue arguing with completely false facts.

No wonder people dont believe in the moon landing,
when they are harrassed by completely clueless arguments...

There are multiple photos as well as some video. The better question is, why don't you already know that?

the bolded is NOT what I said. I said multiple conversions and I never mentioned sound.


I'm still laughing at this quote from you

"Do you mean that analog sound travels at the speed of light?

And digital sound travels at the speed of sound?"

I asked that quote because YOU seemed to think that...

And yes, YOU said that your local radio station got 5-6 seconds delay when they converted to digital sound.
That was your proof.

Good morning.

but really thats all nasa here-say theres no evidence to support any of this that can be found..funny that in the 60s they have this miraculous material but even today they struggle to make any material composite that can withstand 3000 heat

[link to www.nytimes.com]