|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
No there is not a delay in any direction.
It is like listening to an ordinary phone call between 2 persons.
Try to have a conversation with your 3 second delay.
It is impossible without people interrupting each other all the time.
And also, try to find 1 clip from the moon where Houston and/or an astronaut talk at the same time.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70716888 Still your burden of proof. And I'm not sure I trust you when you couldn't be bothered to read that the delay was due to analog -digital conversion until it was posted at least three times and then asked the following "Do you mean that analog sound travels at the speed of light? And digital sound travels at the speed of sound?" To be honest, I think the ISS interview is enough evidence to anyone that have listened to any of the moon conversations with Houston. It is YOUR burden of proof now. Your understanding of analog-digital conversion is embarrassing. Except for you local radio station, give a link to anything that say "analog to digital" creates more than milli-seconds of delay. YOU claimed the apollo conversations show no delay. YOUR burden of proof. you showed ONE ISS interview with delay when there are others with far less. THAT is evidence enough to show that something other than distance is causing the delay. I know from experience that analog-digital conversions can cause significant delay. There are likely other factors as well but for the ISS distance is not one of them. Yet suddenly you, who couldn't be bothered to read that part of my post the first three times and then posted this howler "Do you mean that analog sound travels at the speed of light? And digital sound travels at the speed of sound?" are suddenly an expert.  Yeah right, suddenly... I have personally dealt with this analog to digital conversation since digital came into the picture. I can promise you that you have exaggerated these numbers to possibly 1000 times more than they really are. It is hardly hearable. You say 5-6 seconds extra delay. I say 5-6 milli-seconds is way closer to the truth.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
