NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

They've been able to reflect lasers off of the Moon's suface since the '50s.

the moon has no atmosphere to block sunlight

morning radiation and noon radiation are the same strength

how they keep at room temperature all the time?

in and out the lander

everything supposed to be at water boiling temperature

the moon itself can reflect light or laser

if they said the laser takes 1.5 seconds to get there and 1.5 seconds to reflect back, they lied.

they don't know energy/light has infinite speed in space yet.

look that dog house, can you honestly believe they fly to the moon and back?

To Canada?

Because it is flat

before they lift, the lander/dog house is on top of the rocket.

passes atmosphere at high speed, how could that thing survive?

the gold foil will tear away so fast by the wind.

come on people, don't play stupid.

thank you for showing your complete lack of research.

The LM was covered during launch and was extracted after the TLI burn.

catfish

how they cover the lm during the return?

saw the capsule land on the sea?

how small is it?

can the dog house fit in?

where is the propulsion system?

dr astro retired?

Really? How can that be? Theodore Maiman made the first laser operate on 16 May 1960.

if they want to measure the distance to the moon, radio signal is much effective than light signal.

i don't buy it.

plus, they don't know energy transmitting in space at instant speed.

that exposed all space missions are fake, cuz they faked time delay for all long distance communication.

if you have tools to send radio wave to the moon and measure the time it reflects back

you will find it is almost instant

don't believe me, try it.

laser is the same, will get there and reflect back almost instantly.

Irrelevant.

Or are you suggesting that scientists can't tell the difference?
That would require them to be as stupid as a hoaxie.




It wasn't.

I think it is hilarious that hoaxies can never be bothered to actually study the thing they claim to have such a strong opinion about.




Hoaxies need to answer questions, not ask them.
All these questions only reveal that you are utterly and completely ignorant about Apollo.
And therefore your "opinion" about it can be safely ignored.

In the unlikely case you genuinely want to learn something, the Magic Word would be the MINIMUM requirement.



Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 07/14/2017 05:35 AM

Yes, there are also mirros planted so radioamateurs can bump signals off of them.. the point is that for some reason (aliens, one way trip, <insert whatever>) the footage shown to the public is mostly (if not all) fake, made on Earth.

MANY experiments prove the speed of light is constant in space. but thanks again for proving your inability to research.

The LM didn't come back. Thanks again for proving your inability to research.

I guarantee that YOU have not tried it if you think it is instant.

fools

light in space is instant

only within matter has speed

all space missions are fake

the moon has no atmosphere to block sunlight

morning radiation and noon radiation are the same strength

how they keep at room temperature all the time?

in and out the lander

everything supposed to be at water boiling temperature

nasa lied everything, such as moon's temperature.

the dark side of the moon is not cold

like the dark side of the earth is not cold

the atmosphere does not keep the earth warm at night time

heat cannot vanish into space.

iss will be so hot, water boils.

How they cool it to room temperature?

No way they can dump heat into space.

nasa, china, japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.

they lied right in front your eyes.

if light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?

all space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.

light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.

so any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.

all scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.

if light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how we map the universe and measure the total mass?

it is all bs, all lies.

there is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and from into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?

van allan belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.

near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.

so between earth and moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.

em drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science.

ligo detected gravity wave? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode.

gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.

you don't need science to proof nana faked moon landing

just common knowledge

they said land on the moon at morning time due to high heat at noon time

look many pictures are made at noon time, shadows right under the objects.

the flag is waving, the rope is waving, the man is hanging and dancing.

no dust on the lander legs, no blast creator, the lander leg float on the moon sand.

come on people, are you really stupid?

bump every day till nasa goto jail

Never heard of Lambert's cosine law, have you.

debunk me with science, bs flag means nothing.

the moon has no atmosphere to block sunlight

morning radiation and noon radiation are the same strength

how they keep at room temperature all the time?

in and out the lander

everything supposed to be at water boiling temperature
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72031537


Never heard of Lambert's cosine law, have you.


lots science laws are bs

what is the mechanism?

e=mcc is bs, not fact.

wave-particle duality is bs, only matter and energy exist in the universe.

if you want to debate, put out science and fact, no bs theories and laws.

You don't understand science so it is a waste of time.