NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof

No they are not. That is Lambert's cosine law. The projected area is increased so the energy per square meter declines.




refrigeration and heating. They had coolers and heaters.




And you want to be convinced with science? Right! You are an idiot.

how many videos on youtube people send rockets with the camera look down on earth?

any space missions have any video like that?

Can't they afford a GoPro?

Provide some actual science yourself first. all you've done is asserted without evidence.

the light source distance is the same

the radiation strength is the same

the projected area is the same, morning sun is cooler is the sunlight passes more atmosphere. the moon has none.

cooling and heating? in the vacuum?

you are fuuul of it.

take a good look at that dog house

shut the fuck up you liars

the projected area of the lander and the man are the same!

if you still honestly belivee nasa went to the moon

may God help you.

projected are is not the same.

on the high noon

you stand straight or you lay down to get more sun light?

how about in the morning?

projected area on the man and lander is even bigger in the morning.

you fool

since the day 1 you believed atoms are made from electrons waving/circling/clouding around protons, you are a fool already.

you only get fooler and fooler if you don't find the true mechanism of things.

Thread: Two questions about hydrogen atom that science cannot answer yet

The science required here would be psychiatry.

Meanwhile in sane grown-up people country nobody needs to prove you are wrong.
YOU, as the claimant, needs to prove that YOU are right.

UNTIL YOU DO you are just the crazy compulsive poster the rest of us point and laugh at.

laugh is your science?

smoke some weed

That is all you deserve because you truly are a trolling idiot.

They have been answered. Schrodinger's wave equation and quantum energy levels.

please tell us what is energy?

what is energy level?

if not, you are bsing.

since the day 1 you believed atoms are made from electrons waving/circling/clouding around protons, you are a fool already.

you only get fooler and fooler if you don't find the true mechanism of things.

mark my word

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein 1953

nowadays everything energy, everything quantum.

do you really know what is energy? not even einstein.

what is ENERGY?

coal? fuel? oxygen? wind? sunlight? any matters?

NO. matter is not energy. matter is the carrier/source/container of energy.

a rock at rest only has its thermal energy.

if you threw it away, your hand put a force on the rock pushing it moving at a speed v, the moving rock will have 1/2mvv energy added on it. we call it kinetic energy.

if the flying rock hits a wall, that energy becomes the impact force that hits the wall, makes atoms on the wall vibrate faster/hotter, atoms thermal energy.

so, energy is nothing but vibrating force/moving force.

energy is always vibrating/moving, within and between matters. matter is always moving/vibrating due to the existence of energy.

nothing is ever at rest, keep moving, changing, involving, reforming, transforming.

somehow, LIFE woke up?

You fail because you know nothing about spaceflight, astrodynamics, orbital mechanics, thermodynamics, spacecraft engineering, radiation....etc, etc.

You need to do a little bit of reading before you embarrass yourself further.

...didn't you try to learn anything about NASA's claims before spouting your ignorant nonsense?

1 electron carries 1 negative charge

if we smash the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.

since enertrons carry the same negative charge, they repel each other.

if we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like glass bottle to air.

we put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle, since enertrons repel each other, they put a pressure on the bottle wall. let's measure and call that pressure 1 volt.

if we put 2000000 enertrons into the same bottle, the pressure on the wall should be 2 volt.

now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.

that is the mechanism of light/quantum.


now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?

enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/rrr due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/rr.

the enertron cloud is always vibrating, due to the existence of energy, the unbalance attraction force and repulsion force, within the enertron cloud and the center positive charge.

now image enertron is real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compare with iron magnet.

image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached on the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom.

this is the realistic atomic structure.

atoms are solid balls, matter is not compressible. such as water.

if atoms are constructed as science told you, why matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negative charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/inpact/reaction without crashing?


why is energy conserved?

if you push/put a moving force on any enertron with a force f, that force is spreading to all the enertrons in the bottle at light speed, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever ever.

do we have a perfect bottle?

yes, every atom is a perfect bottle. all matters are perfect bottle. energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.

the forces f=Ke x e1e2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr are like perfect springs between/within matters, connected all matters in 1.

bark as you want

doubt you can debunk anything i said about nasa or science.

prove me wrong?

Okay mister Incredible DimWit, Anonymous Astrophysicist, or whatever other names that keep getting your banned. Caught again in your idiotic trolling.

gravity is like an ice cream cone, the sun is the ball of ice cream, earth is a little mass on the tip of the cone. the cone is made of perfect sring, f=G x m1m2/rr.

the vibrating force/energy of the hot atoms on the sun teleport to our upper atmosphere instantly due to direct connection force f=Ke x q1q2/rr, those particles/gasses energized, vibrating faster, that energy is passing through air atoms along the direction of the force.

the energy/vibrating force/light passes through matter/galss/water/air, the movement of the medium is so called light wave. Light is not wave, light is not matter/particle.

put double slit in vacuum, light will not show wave property.

pass a green light laser beam through a vacuum glass bottle, the beam will disappear inside of the bottle.

there is no light in empty space, light exists within matter.

when sunlight shines on a solar cell

the closest air particles transfer vibrating force to the surface atoms on the cell.

if the vibration force is bigger than the attracting force between the electron and the atom/proton and enertron ball/so called nuclear, the electron will jump out from the atom.

this is the true mechanism of photoelectric effect.

there is no photon knocking electrons out from solar cells.

free electrons in the antenna move back and forth

pass the energy to surrounding air along the force direction.

when the energy/light/em wave in the air reaches the receiving antenna, free electrons move/vibrate with the force, produce signals.

the true mechanism of man-made em waves.

in vacuum, the distance between free electrons in the 2 antennas is changing, vibrating force/energy transfer passes the force line of f=Ke x e1e2/rr instantly.


e=mcc is wrong. matter is charged particles. energy is moving force carried by moving masses/charges.

energy and matter cannot interchange.

if you think matter can transfer into energy, by nuclear reaction, that is a mistake.

if you think energy can transfer into matter, by science story, that is a mistake.

nuclear energy is the same as chemical energy, both are stored within charged particles within atoms.

chemical energy is from releasing the bonding force between electrons and proton/enertron ball, nuclear energy is from releasing the bonding force between proton and enertrons.

this is too deep for you now, you need to understand the true structure of atoms.

modern science is based on false foundation. all the scientists cannot explain why electron and proton do not stick together within a hydrogen atom.

how can you trust any science theory involve atoms?

give you a magnet/proton and an iron bb/electron.

can you make an atom?

any high tech can make the bb waving/circling/clouding around the magnet to form a stable system/atom?

between proton and electron, there is only 1 force existing f=Ke x pe/rr. it is 10^39 times stronger than gravity.

it is IMPOSSIBLE 1 proton and 1 electron can form an atom.

the only possibility is they stick together under super strong attraction force.

standard model and orbital model are so wrong, mislead science into dark age.



for those believe our sun is a nuclear reactor, ask yourself few questions.

why does all the nuclear fuel not ignite at once?

how nuclear reaction produces heat/energy?

how the energy reaches earth?

if the sun has radiated out energy for 5 billion years, where is all that energy?

what is energy? moving force produced by moving mass?

without matter, there is no energy, no force, nothing. no us, no thought.

matter is made from charged particles.

oppositely charged particles attract each other, they collide like magnet and iron ball. the impact force/energy becomes heat/thermal energy of the atoms.

the more atoms get together by gravity attraction, the more mass is added, the higher thermal energy density, the higher temperature.

so bigger star carries more energy, produces stronger light.

the energy is stored in vibrating atoms/charged particles.

the energy a star carry is the vibrating gravity and electrostatic force in its total mass/charges.

the sun's energy is from star formation, the sun is not an active nuclear reactor.

the energy cannot vanish into space but share with other matters surround according to their distance.

if spacex send cago to iss

they have to ac the ship on land

heat it during passing upper atmosphere

that's no problem, they can do heat exchange with air outside.

once they reach orbit, they have NO WAY to heat exchange.

pretty hot up there, maybe?

maybe they can fart to vent the heat?

how much beams they ate?

send people to mars?

go back to the moon?

spacex said they will send 2 people to fly around the moon 20117.

let's see how it turned out?

i predict MORE LIES AND CGIS

or they simply cancel the bluffing.

bet? dr astro

how much $ can you lose?

The exact distance between the Moon and Earth varies since the Moon follows an elliptical (oval) orbit, but on average the Moon is 384,399 km away. If you had a piece of string that long, you could wrap it all the way around the Earth’s equator almost ten times.

Ancient Greek astronomers were able to make rough estimates of the distance to the Moon using information from eclipses to make geometric calculations. Since the 1960s, we have however had access to a much more accurate way of measuring this distance.

Astronauts on the Apollo 11, 14 and 15 missions positioned retro-reflectors (a bit like the cat’s eyes you see on roads) on the surface of the Moon. Physicists bounce a pulse of laser off one of these reflectors, timing how long it takes for the laser beam to make the return trip - about two and a half seconds. Since we know the speed of light, they can then work out how far away the Moon is to within a few millimetres.

This project is called the Lunar Laser Ranging experiment and it took measurements every year between 1969 and 2009. The information collected has led for instance to the discovery that the Moon creeps 38 mm further away from us every year. It has also allowed physicists to deduce that the Moon’s core is liquid.

When it comes to calculating how far away the other planets in the solar system are, we don’t have the luxury of reflectors. Instead, astronomers use a similar technique which relies on bouncing a radar signal off a planet’s surface. For planets visited by space probes, they can also time how long a radio signal sent by the probe takes to travel back to Earth.

light go to the moon and back take about 2.5 seconds?

how they measure atom weight to 5 digits after zero?

before they land on the moon to place mirrors, why don't they radar the moon distance?

before they land the moon, they don't know the distance yet, how to calculate orbit and fuel needed?

how they measure the size, mass and age of the universe?

black holes, dark matter and energy?

multiverse? extra dimensions? simulatins?

come on people, time to wake up.

time to change, enough is enough. this is 2017 not 1017.

hoax confirmed

flat-earther should vote me for their pres

too bad my head is not flat