Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 838 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 21,215
Pageviews Today: 44,767Threads Today: 27Posts Today: 390
12:57 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
03/06/2017 05:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
I can just about believe we landed on the moon. BUT. How in the hell did they get back to Earth? Just get back in the rocket and turn the ignition? And why have they not been back in over 40 years?
 Quoting: BadMoonRising 68168229


they docked the LM with the CSM and then discarded the LM. The CSM (command and service module) had a large rocket attached to it.

They haven't been back because nobody has wanted to pay for it since then.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Actually, they would have left the bottom half of the LM on the Moon and only docked with the top half.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


True. They used rocket staging whenever they could, discarding whatever wasn't needed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 884489
United States
03/06/2017 09:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Kubrick used the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) as cover for filming the Apollo scenes. No one would've suspicious... After all, he's just filming a space/moon movie, right? :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 884489
United States
03/06/2017 09:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Kubrick used the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) as cover for filming the Apollo scenes. No one would've suspicious... After all, he's just filming a space/moon movie, right? :)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 884489


*would be
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
03/06/2017 09:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Kubrick used the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) as cover for filming the Apollo scenes. No one would've suspicious... After all, he's just filming a space/moon movie, right? :)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 884489


Except the lunar scenes of 2001 look nothing like Apollo. Apollo had many more hours of EVA footage than all of 2001 and it included live interaction with mission control.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57482513
United States
03/06/2017 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Kubrick used the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) as cover for filming the Apollo scenes. No one would've suspicious... After all, he's just filming a space/moon movie, right? :)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 884489


Except the lunar scenes of 2001 look nothing like Apollo. Apollo had many more hours of EVA footage than all of 2001 and it included live interaction with mission control.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Didn't Kubrick direct more than one movie? Did they all have a similar look and feel of "2001"? Or was Kubrick more flexible?
hankie

User ID: 71719409
United States
03/06/2017 10:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
NASA has said many times in many talks by many people from engineers up to scientist that they have never gone out of low orbit. That low orbit is the highest flights of the large high altitude planes, that has ever flown. They do checking what going on in the world from up there and experiments on and from these planes.

If they say they have never flown higher than low altitude then they been saying, we did not go to the moon, or the moon is not so far away, take your choice of which. Either the moon is in our low orbit or it way out there and they have never gone there. Just a big hoax on the people of the world. They sure used a lot of money for something during that time, talk to the people in Antarctica they were over this part, too. They manage everything about Antarctica so there is where the money pit went.
Sorry I got a headache

These are the times that tries men's and
women's souls!

May we come though it victorious!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73507061
United States
03/06/2017 10:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
I WATCHED the moon "mission" with my brothers, father & mother, LIVE on TV in July of 1969. We were all passed out in our den when my dad woke us up near 4am to tell us to watch as Neil Armstrong (allegedly) took the first steps. There was no one in the world MORE PROUD than myself & my family & nearly every family in America also watching. I wrote NASA a letter asking for the 'Moon Photos' they provided for free to school children (plus p&h, naturally). I hung those photo posters all over my room, alongside my National Geographic full Blow-Up posters of the moon and the maps of the moon. There is NO ONE ON EARTH WHO DRANK THE KOOLAID ON THIS STORY MORE THAN ME. So please, no that it took MANY MANY YEARS for my to buy "that B.S. that we did not go to the Moon", as i would snap at every single conspiracy theorist who came down the pike....UNTIL I started to do my own, independent reasearch, as you all should do, especially those WHO NEVER QUESTION THE OFFICIAL STORY. Let me ask you this... WHAT ARE THE PROBABLITIES OF NASA JUST HAPPENING TO LOSE ALL THE VIDEO FOOTAGE FROM THE APOLLO 11 MISSION? That is what they are telling people for decades now... THEY LOST ALL THE FRIGGIN FOOTAGE. Ok, if that is credible, what if they told you they just HAPPENED TO LOSE ALL OF THE FRIGGIN SCHEMATICS FOR THE L.E.M. spacecraft, the moon lander? Starting to sound funny? What about the moon rocks which were tested and were found to be ALL FROM EARTH?


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1897079


4am? Armstrong took his first steps at 2:56 UTC which would be 10:56 pm Eastern or as early as 7:56 pm on the west coast. So you started your story with a lie.

It is also a lie that all the footage from Apollo 11 is lost. We have copies of all the footage and all that is lost is the original video piggybacked on the telemetry tapes from the EVAs only. That is likely because the tapes were written over when Memorex had a tape shortage in the 70's and NASA was then faced with the choice of reusing tapes they had copies of or not collecting data from ongoing missions and probes.

The schematics for the LM are not lost either. NASA does not own them as they didn't build it. Grumman has the schematics.

No rocks have been found to be from Earth. On the contrary they have been found to have been formed in low gravity, exposed to millions of years of cosmic rays, and have never been in contact with liquid water. Perhaps you're thinking of the rock in the netherlands? It was not given by NASA. NASA didn't give out any rocks at all in 1969. At best it was given by the US ambassador to the former prime minister. But even that can't be proven. All that is known for sure is it was found in his estate after his death and his family ASSUMED it was a Moon rock.

LOL at Collier claiming they couldn't fit through the LM hatch when there are pics and videos showing them doing just that.

Apollo's path DID take them around the thickest parts of the belts. The recent NASA video is specifically talking about testing the electronics of the new craft which are more sensitive than Apollo's. The path around the belts is also not available for interplanetary trips.


Funny how NASA claims the Van Allen Belts were not a problem for the Apollo astronauts IN 1969-72 -- they went through them about 7 times. Yet as recently as 2012, NASA spent a millions of dollars to build & send a probe to study the Van Allen Belts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62070845

There were 9 trips there and back. And again, their trajectory took them around the thickest parts of the belts. But thanks for proving that hoaxies know the least about the subject.




 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Hey moron! Wake up it was fake!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
03/06/2017 10:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Kubrick used the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) as cover for filming the Apollo scenes. No one would've suspicious... After all, he's just filming a space/moon movie, right? :)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 884489


Except the lunar scenes of 2001 look nothing like Apollo. Apollo had many more hours of EVA footage than all of 2001 and it included live interaction with mission control.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Didn't Kubrick direct more than one movie? Did they all have a similar look and feel of "2001"? Or was Kubrick more flexible?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


Only 2001 had scenes on the Moon which is why it is often quoted.

We also know that Kubrick was provably busy with multiple other films during Apollo and he was also in the UK and afraid of flying.

But sure, just gloss over the fact that there were multiple more hours of unbroken EVA footage compared to minutes in other films and that it included live interaction.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73507061
United States
03/06/2017 10:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
STANLEY KUBRICK - SHINING CODE - DETAILS ABOUT APOLLO 'FAKE' MISSION IN KUBRICK'S FILM, "THE SHINING"
SKIP TO 0:5:49 -



bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1897079


Really having to dig deep into conspiracy THEORY to reach that conclusion huh?

As a teenager, I got to shake Dr. Edgar Mitchell's hand at a conference my father (25 yr USAF Korean/Vietnam veteran) took me. It was his talk about his NASA career and science that got me interested in getting pursuing electronics/computer science. He definitely earned my respect and trust, especially on his later statements regarding UFO's, ET's and Roswell.

You develop an instant global consciousness, a people orientation, an intense dissatisfaction with the state of the world, and a compulsion to do something about it. From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, "Look at that, you son of a bitch."
— Mitchell on seeing the Earth from the Moon.
 Quoting: Agent MIB




The astronauts may actually have thought they DID go to the moon. Give them enough of certain types of drugs, hypnosis, mental conditioning and you could probably convince them they were James Kirk on The Enterprise. We have to go with PHYSICAL facts rather than what people say. The physical facts support that we did NOT go to the moon. The LEM, only flown once on earth, was a sad joke.
 Quoting: Mehitable 68162485


The LM was never flown on Earth. It was designed for flight only in low gravity and a vacuum. It was tested in space on Apollo 9 and 10.

You are probably thinking of the LLTV and LLRV. Those were training vehicles used to simulate the lower gravity. They flew much more than once. There were hundreds of successful flights.

Thanks again for proving that hoaxies know the least about the subject.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


morons will be morons! Man went to the moon! ha! so laughable!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6161946
Philippines
03/06/2017 10:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
you gotta explain the retro reflective mirrors

this element is what moon conspiracy tards always neglect

and it complicates every moon conspiracy

not saying there is not a conspiracy

but you need to explain it

and it also draws into the conspiracy all of those who are to this day claiming to receive readings from these mirrors
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57482513
United States
03/07/2017 12:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
you gotta explain the retro reflective mirrors

this element is what moon conspiracy tards always neglect

and it complicates every moon conspiracy

not saying there is not a conspiracy

but you need to explain it

and it also draws into the conspiracy all of those who are to this day claiming to receive readings from these mirrors
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6161946


Yeah, the only way to get mirrors on the Moon would be to hand deliver them by Neil Armstrong. So there, conspiracy tards. Explain that away.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74355352
New Zealand
03/07/2017 03:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
you gotta explain the retro reflective mirrors

this element is what moon conspiracy tards always neglect

and it complicates every moon conspiracy

not saying there is not a conspiracy

but you need to explain it

and it also draws into the conspiracy all of those who are to this day claiming to receive readings from these mirrors
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6161946


Yeah, the only way to get mirrors on the Moon would be to hand deliver them by Neil Armstrong. So there, conspiracy tards. Explain that away.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


yeah out the hatch they couldnt get through with all their gearton.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 68914848
Netherlands
03/07/2017 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
NASA has said many times in many talks by many people from engineers up to scientist that they have never gone out of low orbit.
 Quoting: hankie


yeah out the hatch they couldnt get through with all their gearton.
 Quoting: NZ Coward 74355352

Hoaxies are big, fat liars who lie.

Why are hoaxies big, fat liars who lie?

Don't they actually know that they are regurgitating lies, like brain-dead parrots?
Are they post-truthers?
Are the merely despicable trolls?
What is it with these people?
book
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57482513
United States
03/07/2017 09:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
NASA has said many times in many talks by many people from engineers up to scientist that they have never gone out of low orbit.
 Quoting: hankie


yeah out the hatch they couldnt get through with all their gearton.
 Quoting: NZ Coward 74355352

Hoaxies are big, fat liars who lie.

Why are hoaxies big, fat liars who lie?

Don't they actually know that they are regurgitating lies, like brain-dead parrots?
Are they post-truthers?
Are the merely despicable trolls?
What is it with these people?
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Yeah, Halcyon has given his testimony that he personally and directly witnessed Armstrong land the LM on the Moon. Not only that, but he has signed his name to his statement.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
03/07/2017 09:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
I WATCHED the moon "mission" with my brothers, father & mother, LIVE on TV in July of 1969. We were all passed out in our den when my dad woke us up near 4am to tell us to watch as Neil Armstrong (allegedly) took the first steps. There was no one in the world MORE PROUD than myself & my family & nearly every family in America also watching. I wrote NASA a letter asking for the 'Moon Photos' they provided for free to school children (plus p&h, naturally). I hung those photo posters all over my room, alongside my National Geographic full Blow-Up posters of the moon and the maps of the moon. There is NO ONE ON EARTH WHO DRANK THE KOOLAID ON THIS STORY MORE THAN ME. So please, no that it took MANY MANY YEARS for my to buy "that B.S. that we did not go to the Moon", as i would snap at every single conspiracy theorist who came down the pike....UNTIL I started to do my own, independent reasearch, as you all should do, especially those WHO NEVER QUESTION THE OFFICIAL STORY. Let me ask you this... WHAT ARE THE PROBABLITIES OF NASA JUST HAPPENING TO LOSE ALL THE VIDEO FOOTAGE FROM THE APOLLO 11 MISSION? That is what they are telling people for decades now... THEY LOST ALL THE FRIGGIN FOOTAGE. Ok, if that is credible, what if they told you they just HAPPENED TO LOSE ALL OF THE FRIGGIN SCHEMATICS FOR THE L.E.M. spacecraft, the moon lander? Starting to sound funny? What about the moon rocks which were tested and were found to be ALL FROM EARTH?


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1897079


4am? Armstrong took his first steps at 2:56 UTC which would be 10:56 pm Eastern or as early as 7:56 pm on the west coast. So you started your story with a lie.

It is also a lie that all the footage from Apollo 11 is lost. We have copies of all the footage and all that is lost is the original video piggybacked on the telemetry tapes from the EVAs only. That is likely because the tapes were written over when Memorex had a tape shortage in the 70's and NASA was then faced with the choice of reusing tapes they had copies of or not collecting data from ongoing missions and probes.

The schematics for the LM are not lost either. NASA does not own them as they didn't build it. Grumman has the schematics.

No rocks have been found to be from Earth. On the contrary they have been found to have been formed in low gravity, exposed to millions of years of cosmic rays, and have never been in contact with liquid water. Perhaps you're thinking of the rock in the netherlands? It was not given by NASA. NASA didn't give out any rocks at all in 1969. At best it was given by the US ambassador to the former prime minister. But even that can't be proven. All that is known for sure is it was found in his estate after his death and his family ASSUMED it was a Moon rock.

LOL at Collier claiming they couldn't fit through the LM hatch when there are pics and videos showing them doing just that.

Apollo's path DID take them around the thickest parts of the belts. The recent NASA video is specifically talking about testing the electronics of the new craft which are more sensitive than Apollo's. The path around the belts is also not available for interplanetary trips.


Funny how NASA claims the Van Allen Belts were not a problem for the Apollo astronauts IN 1969-72 -- they went through them about 7 times. Yet as recently as 2012, NASA spent a millions of dollars to build & send a probe to study the Van Allen Belts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62070845

There were 9 trips there and back. And again, their trajectory took them around the thickest parts of the belts. But thanks for proving that hoaxies know the least about the subject.




 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Hey moron! Wake up it was fake!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73507061


Gee what a well thought out and detailed response! Hope you didn't hurt yourself. rolleyes
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69540754
Korea, Republic of
03/07/2017 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
.

If the moon landing was faked, why are retro reflectors returning light?

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57482513
United States
03/07/2017 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
.

If the moon landing was faked, why are retro reflectors returning light?

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69540754



Think carefully. Is the only way to get a mirror on the Moon to have it hand delivered by Neil and Buzz?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 64356937
Canada
03/07/2017 12:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
.

If the moon landing was faked, why are retro reflectors returning light?

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69540754



Think carefully. Is the only way to get a mirror on the Moon to have it hand delivered by Neil and Buzz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


How do you know that they put mirrors on the moon? Did you point lasers at it a get a reflection? There isn't a laser out ther that can travel that distance without refracting to the point where the mirror would be useless.
Dumb uneducated people taking in all the Kool aid. Even educated people that can't apply theory to the real world drink the Kool aid as well.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 64356937
Canada
03/07/2017 12:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
.

If the moon landing was faked, why are retro reflectors returning light?

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69540754



Think carefully. Is the only way to get a mirror on the Moon to have it hand delivered by Neil and Buzz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


How do you know that they put mirrors on the moon? Did you point lasers at it a get a reflection? There isn't a laser out ther that can travel that distance without refracting to the point where the mirror would be useless.
Dumb uneducated people taking in all the Kool aid. Even educated people that can't apply theory to the real world drink the Kool aid as well.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57482513
United States
03/07/2017 12:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
.

If the moon landing was faked, why are retro reflectors returning light?

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69540754



Think carefully. Is the only way to get a mirror on the Moon to have it hand delivered by Neil and Buzz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


How do you know that they put mirrors on the moon? Did you point lasers at it a get a reflection? There isn't a laser out ther that can travel that distance without refracting to the point where the mirror would be useless.
Dumb uneducated people taking in all the Kool aid. Even educated people that can't apply theory to the real world drink the Kool aid as well.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64356937


It really doesn't matter if there is a mirror on the Moon. The point I was making is that getting a mirror to the Moon does not require that Neil and Buzz hand deliver it.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 68914848
Netherlands
03/08/2017 03:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Hoaxies are big, fat liars who lie.

Why are hoaxies big, fat liars who lie?
Don't they actually know that they are regurgitating lies, like brain-dead parrots?
Are they post-truthers?
Are the merely despicable trolls?
What is it with these people?
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD

Yeah, Halcyon has given his testimony that he personally and directly witnessed Armstrong land the LM on the Moon. Not only that, but he has signed his name to his statement.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513

Self-demonstrating article.

Hoaxies lie, it must be in their job description.
book


Think carefully. Is the only way to get a mirror on the Moon to have it hand delivered by Neil and Buzz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513

If you have any evidence for the retro-reflectors being placed by any other method than the thoroughly documented one please present it.
book


How do you know that they put mirrors on the moon?
 Quoting: Canatard 64356937

So you have added yet a few more million people to your fantasised conspiracy.

There isn't a laser out ther that can travel that distance without refracting to the point where the mirror would be useless.
 Quoting: Canatard 64356937

Hoaxies lie.

They can't help themselves.

Dumb uneducated people taking in all the Kool aid. Even educated people that can't apply theory to the real world drink the Kool aid as well.
 Quoting: Canatard 64356937

Diatribes are irrelevant.

You have yet to present a single piece of evidence for your anti-scientific claims and criminal accusation.
We all know you never will.
Hoaxies haven't been able to prove A SINGLE EVIDENTIARY CLAIM in nearly half a century.
That ain't ever gonna to change.
book
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60411264
United States
03/08/2017 04:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Kubrick used the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) as cover for filming the Apollo scenes. No one would've suspicious... After all, he's just filming a space/moon movie, right? :)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 884489


Except the lunar scenes of 2001 look nothing like Apollo. Apollo had many more hours of EVA footage than all of 2001 and it included live interaction with mission control.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Didn't Kubrick direct more than one movie? Did they all have a similar look and feel of "2001"? Or was Kubrick more flexible?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


Only 2001 had scenes on the Moon which is why it is often quoted.

We also know that Kubrick was provably busy with multiple other films during Apollo and he was also in the UK and afraid of flying.

But sure, just gloss over the fact that there were multiple more hours of unbroken EVA footage compared to minutes in other films and that it included live interaction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799

Yes, it was filmed on the sound stage in England. What's the problem?

And it didn't need to look exactly like 2001. The point is, people would see a space/moon movie being filmed and think nothing of it because he was making 2001.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60411264
United States
03/08/2017 04:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
.

If the moon landing was faked, why are retro reflectors returning light?

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69540754



Think carefully. Is the only way to get a mirror on the Moon to have it hand delivered by Neil and Buzz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


One time I looked at my asshole in the mirror... IT BLEW MY FUCKING MIND!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
03/08/2017 09:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
...


Except the lunar scenes of 2001 look nothing like Apollo. Apollo had many more hours of EVA footage than all of 2001 and it included live interaction with mission control.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Didn't Kubrick direct more than one movie? Did they all have a similar look and feel of "2001"? Or was Kubrick more flexible?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


Only 2001 had scenes on the Moon which is why it is often quoted.

We also know that Kubrick was provably busy with multiple other films during Apollo and he was also in the UK and afraid of flying.

But sure, just gloss over the fact that there were multiple more hours of unbroken EVA footage compared to minutes in other films and that it included live interaction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799

Yes, it was filmed on the sound stage in England. What's the problem?

And it didn't need to look exactly like 2001. The point is, people would see a space/moon movie being filmed and think nothing of it because he was making 2001.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60411264


The problem is that he was busy doing other things and there is no evidence he was involved filming apollo at all. And if it didn't need to look exactly like 2001, then why bring up his 2001 moon shots?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72457200
United States
03/08/2017 09:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
...


Didn't Kubrick direct more than one movie? Did they all have a similar look and feel of "2001"? Or was Kubrick more flexible?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


Only 2001 had scenes on the Moon which is why it is often quoted.

We also know that Kubrick was provably busy with multiple other films during Apollo and he was also in the UK and afraid of flying.

But sure, just gloss over the fact that there were multiple more hours of unbroken EVA footage compared to minutes in other films and that it included live interaction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799

Yes, it was filmed on the sound stage in England. What's the problem?

And it didn't need to look exactly like 2001. The point is, people would see a space/moon movie being filmed and think nothing of it because he was making 2001.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60411264


The problem is that he was busy doing other things and there is no evidence he was involved filming apollo at all. And if it didn't need to look exactly like 2001, then why bring up his 2001 moon shots?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


He was doing "moon" shots. People passing by would just assume it was for 2001.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72457200
United States
03/08/2017 09:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
...


Didn't Kubrick direct more than one movie? Did they all have a similar look and feel of "2001"? Or was Kubrick more flexible?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57482513


Only 2001 had scenes on the Moon which is why it is often quoted.

We also know that Kubrick was provably busy with multiple other films during Apollo and he was also in the UK and afraid of flying.

But sure, just gloss over the fact that there were multiple more hours of unbroken EVA footage compared to minutes in other films and that it included live interaction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799

Yes, it was filmed on the sound stage in England. What's the problem?

And it didn't need to look exactly like 2001. The point is, people would see a space/moon movie being filmed and think nothing of it because he was making 2001.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60411264


The problem is that he was busy doing other things and there is no evidence he was involved filming apollo at all. And if it didn't need to look exactly like 2001, then why bring up his 2001 moon shots?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


Busy doing other things? LOL Funny.

No evidence? ROFL Very funny.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71952359
United States
03/08/2017 09:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Moontards... yeahsure
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72457200
United States
03/08/2017 09:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Front screen projection.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2461293
United States
03/08/2017 09:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
Earthly man has never stepped foot on Earth's moon.
Earthly man cannot go further than low Earth orbit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73085799
United States
03/08/2017 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES
...


Only 2001 had scenes on the Moon which is why it is often quoted.

We also know that Kubrick was provably busy with multiple other films during Apollo and he was also in the UK and afraid of flying.

But sure, just gloss over the fact that there were multiple more hours of unbroken EVA footage compared to minutes in other films and that it included live interaction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799

Yes, it was filmed on the sound stage in England. What's the problem?

And it didn't need to look exactly like 2001. The point is, people would see a space/moon movie being filmed and think nothing of it because he was making 2001.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60411264


The problem is that he was busy doing other things and there is no evidence he was involved filming apollo at all. And if it didn't need to look exactly like 2001, then why bring up his 2001 moon shots?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73085799


He was doing "moon" shots. People passing by would just assume it was for 2001.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72457200


Except he wasn't. The Apollo videos have clear signs of low gravity and vacuum. They also have live interaction with Mission Control. Kubrick was famous for needing multiple reshots just to get the tiniest scene right. We're supposed to believe he found time to make many tens of hours of EVA video that has scenes lasting hours with no cuts? Really?