Whenever I think of the moon landing bullshit I always think of the James Bond movie "Diamonds are Forever". In that movie, there's a sequence where James Bond gets into a complex in the desert where they're shooting.....moon videos. With a lunar capsule and astronauts and rovers....it looks just the kind of set up that they might actually have used to film this bullshit. Bond ends up stealing one of the Rovers to escape the bad guys and breaks out of the complex into the real desert.
And that probably is as good a summation of our moon "landing" as any.....
Quoting: Mehitable 68162485 "your" Moon landing maybe...my generation, and ones before it, actually learned stuff in school, and didn't need a handheld brain to do their higher brain functions for them......because you haven't a clue how things work in the real world is not our problem.
To win an argument, you need to understand both sides...and you don't.
Don't throw your condescending bullshit at me. I'm over 60 fucking years old and I watched the moon "landing" on TV. This was an OBVIOUS FRAUD when you examine the actual physical details, like this researcher does in this excellent video. There are things like the space clearances in the LEM and the door space, etc, that you simply cannot explain away. IT'S A PHYSICAL REALITY. You can't fit 2 astronauts 3 feet deep through a door that's only 2 feet deep. The clearances here are grossly insufficient. [/qquote]
Sure, let's just ignore the many pics and videos that show them going through the door. Collier lied to you and you bought it hook, line, and sinker.
And who would use an LEM that had only flown on earth ONCE and according to the video nearly blew up that time, almost killing Neil Armstrong?
Quoting: Mehitable 68162485 Again, the LM did not fly on Earth. It DID fly in space on Apollo 9 and 10. You are referring to the training vehicles, the LLRV and the LLTV. There were hundreds of successful flights. Armstrongs accident was due to an unrelated technical problem of a prototype.
Why are there no stars in these videos?
Quoting: Mehitable 68162485 Because there shouldn't be. Stars are relatively dim compared to sunlit objects.
How can we clearly see blue sky through the module windows?
Quoting: Mehitable 68162485 You don't. You see glare from one of the coatings on the glass.
How can there be dust clouds on the moon with no atmosphere?
Quoting: Mehitable 68162485 There aren't. In fact we do see dust moving in neat parabolic arcs without clouding, which could only happen in a vacuum.
Why is the earth the wrong size?
Quoting: Mehitable 68162485 Compared to what? Do you realize that the lens used affects the apparent size of the object? Pics from the surface had a wide field of view because they used wide angle lenses. Do the math on the field of view with pics that show the Earth and it takes up about 2 degrees every time, as it should.
