Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES

LM hatch too small?

[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

Wow. That took almost 9 seconds to debunk.

The easiest way too prove the hoax isn't what they did but what they didn't do.

When we first went into space it was too risky too send men so they sent dogs and monkeys into orbit first and decided it was safe too send men into orbit.

The next step would be too leave orbit and the protection of the magnetosphere and through the van allen belts.

This was obviously way too dangerous too send men so first you have to send dogs or monkeys.

But they never did because we have never sent men any further than they safety of Earth orbit.

Because the multiple probes they sent first don't count? The purpose of send animals was to test the effects of the acceleration and low gravity. They knew how radiation would affect them and didn't need to test it on animals first.

Everything is tested on animals first and especially back in the 50s,60s,and 70s when animal rights didn't mean anything probes are useful but if you think they wouldn't send an animal first your deluding yourself.

Sure, just ignore the point that there was no need as they already knew the effects of gravity and radiation and knew what to expect from multiple unmanned probes.

That's just dumb of course probes are useful for investigating but they can only detect the things you are looking for.

What about all the hidden threats of leaving orbit that you can only detect by sending something living ??

You seem to be way too trusting of probes when nobody actually knew what was out their too probe !!

Hidden threats like what? What is there going to be that can't be detected by a probe, that wasn't already encountered in low Earth orbit, that an animal that can't talk to you could identify, and that couldn't be inferred from our knowledge of astronomy and stellar physics?

Probes can only detect the things you expect too be there and have built the probe too detect, if their are unseen dangers that your unaware of then your probe is useless which is why you would send some type of animal first , it's a pretty simple concept which we use all the time except when visiting the moon when we just assume it's safe and skip this basic step.

Low Earth orbit is well within our magnetosphere and a whole different ballgame too outer space which means you have to test that something actually can survive out there before you ever send a man , they didn't bother which is highly reckless and unscientific.

"I am a radiophobe and a coward therefore everyone is" is not a well-thought out answer.


Apparently there are people out there who think that the audio-visual stuff is the only evidence for Apollo.
That's hilarious, you could throw out the photos, films, and videos, and you'd still be able to prove Men on the Men beyond any reasonable doubt.

And you avoided the question. You send an animal on a multi-day trip and he experiences pain. He can't tell you what's wrong or even where it hurts. He dies from some unknown radiation. What was it? Why wasn't it predicted based on our knowledge of stellar physics and astronomy. The dead animal can't tell you. Is that animal more susceptible to whatever type of radiation this is? We don't know because in your world our knowledge of stellar physics is completely wrong and we have no idea what to expect. They didn't send animals in airplanes first, or to the bottom of the ocean. What if there had been "unseen dangers" there? Apparently those must all be faked too.

All you've got is an "if I ran the zoo" fallacy and it isn't even that well thought out.

The animal may not be able too tell you what killed it but it's death alone would tell you that something bad is out there and then you can build probes too find out what's going on. The fact that they totally skipped this basic step screams of hoax.

Rockets do not work in space. So yes the moon landing was a hoax. What retard thinks that pressurized hot gases moving to lower pressure is the same as throwing a rock while on a skateboard.

No rocket has ever went straight up. But people still buy the BS.

Without knowing the cause of death, how do you know what to look for with the probes? Again, in your world there is apparently no knowledge of stellar physics. What if it died because it refused to eat because it didn't like low gravity? What if it died because it bumped its head on a bulkhead? Still and "if I ran the zoo" fallacy and still not well thought out.

Thank you proving you have no understanding of orbital mechanics. They don't go straight up because those that launch them aren't stupid and they know how to achieve an orbit.

What retard thinks that accelerating a large mass out one direction won't cause a force in the other direction?

You're argument is ridiculous as it's common knowledge that we sent Mice, Flies, Cats, Dogs and Monkeys into orbit too gain knowledge of surviving in space, but when it comes too leaving orbit no tests were done at all.

Obviously you do multiple tests so you can be sure the results are accurate so where are the multiple animals that left Earths orbit first, they don't exist.

Unfortunately, this may be true!



NASA certainly lies about everything, and should be de-funded and closed down.

Because AGAIN, they were sent to test for the acceleration and low gravity conditions. Those aren't going to change. Radiation is far easier to test for with unmanned probes, which they did.

Shillcyon Daze is a monstrous NASA buttlicking shill, and should be totally ignored, as should his various sock-puppets.

C'mon dude when the astronots supposedly came back from the moon they had to live in quarantine for days because of possible moon bug contamination because nobody really knew what was out there which is why you would always have sent some animals first. Didn't happen.

An AC hoax-believer ad hominem? Never seen one of those before.

A quarantine only imposed mostly for show after they were directly exposed to multiple other people on the helicopter and ship that picked them up. And it was also because they had contact with Moon dust which if you sent animals first they wouldn't

A very blatant admission that you know you can't rebut me.
But you're prolly to stupid to even realise that.

You can't handle the truth, that's why you are so afraid of it.
Just run away than, coward.

Orbiting satellites travel through the van Allen belts. Van Allen belts are also associated with aurora which can wreck havoc on the power grid and satellite operations.

Are you really this stupid? No seriously. You can't possibly be that insanely stupid.

We'll show me a video of a rocket that does not basically make a parabolic exhaust stream. You can tell people that they are stupid but in fact that is the response given when you cannot present any other argument

funny all you folk arguing semantics....blah

if the hatch was too small...and the murdered reporter was denied access to it too measure then ...thats it.

the nasa guy called frank physically pushed the cherry piker away when the reporter began to measure and verify the hatch dimensions.

thats all you need to know. if the hatch was too small for the astronauts with full suits and tanks on to enter and exit...case closed..


then the reporter was murdered.

coincidence...

so if they did go to the moon they physically couldnt in the oile lem.

Ask any HAM radio operator about EME bounce and you'll see that even radio waves can reflect off the moon and bounce back to Earth. It takes a modulated high powered laser and tracking system to keep it pointed at the retroreflection mirrors on the lunar surface. They use this method to accurately measure the lunar distance from Earth.

All these distractions are irrelevant.

OP claimed LM hatch too small.

I provided a pic of the astronauts actually climbing through said hatch while in their spacesuit.

OP debunked.

How unusual with Apollo-threads.

Last Edited by 74444 on 03/09/2017 11:47 AM

Where's the pic?