Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76494799 United States 04/22/2018 04:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's see it. Photos of the moon are very hi-res now. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA creates these red herrings and controlled opposition shills to discredit the truth by making people who disbelieve the Saga look loony, stupid, or uneducated by association. Due to my own efforts throught th FOIA to get access to the Apollo telemtry tapes, they suddenly discovered they were "lost". It is extremely easy to prove Apollo wasa hoax from a scientific standpoint and thats why NASA's shills have moved the goalposts calling it a historical achievement that doesn't require critical scientific scrutiny . It's a fable people. The 'USSR" went along with it because the plan has been all along to unite the world under one totalitarian communist government modeled after soviet Russia. The USA moonlanding was meant to create the illusion of one big happy family sharing a HUMAN accomplishment and landing on another planet. Humanity was united in something finally, but it was of course a lie. I know it is a difficult concept to wrap your mind around that the US and the SU could be cooperating towards the same goal with the cold war BS, but they were. The intent, control and motivate through fear to prevent a nationalist revolution in both countries by white Christians, to keep them at odds and fearing each other instead of working together to take control of their own countries. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is time that someone provide actual photographic evidence of something man-made that we left on the moon, like the "descent module" which is supposedly still up there. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 Let's see it. Photos of the moon are very hi-res now. The problem here is of course that such photographs must come from an independent source to be of any value. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76494799 United States 04/22/2018 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 240,000 miles from Earth to Moon in 3 Days? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 That is 3,333 mph average. Really? Yeah, and they were moving at 8 miles a second when they left orbit. HUH HUH!-What actually happened is the spacecraft was indeed launched, but the Command service module never left low Earth orbit. Only the third stage /LEM went onto the moon, the LEM being an unmanned probe capable of retrieving samples like the Russians sent , only on a larger scale. Thats all it was. The videos and picts are clearly and demonstrably fakes |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: VHS 1897079 we could go down the laundry list... hasselblad camera film would've MELTED in 250f radioactive solar particles would've gone right through the cameras and destroyed film Since you make this claim, you must be familiar with this matter and must have done the math. Thus it should be easy for you to answer the questions below: * What kind of film was used? * What kind of Hasselblad camera was used? * Was the camera modified? * If "yes", in which way? * How much heat could go into the camera? * How much radiation could go into the camera? * What kind of radiation? . ^^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^ Hail Hydra! Dr Astro on his box accounts patting himself on the back again. The routine is getting old. He has 11 fans and they are all him. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 240,000 miles from Earth to Moon in 3 Days? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 That is 3,333 mph average. Really? Yeah, and they were moving at 8 miles a second when they left orbit. HUH HUH!-What actually happened is the spacecraft was indeed launched, but the Command service module never left low Earth orbit. Only the third stage /LEM went onto the moon, the LEM being an unmanned probe capable of retrieving samples like the Russians sent , only on a larger scale. Thats all it was. The videos and picts are clearly and demonstrably fakes According to my calculations at the speed they were traveling a straight line trajectory would require a little over 8 hours. The actual trajectory was a bit less direct being more of a curved path, but this still doesn't explain why an 8 hour trip with a slight detour took over 72 hours. What did they do, stop at every Stuckeys along the way and buy a pecan log? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502542 Australia 04/22/2018 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is time that someone provide actual photographic evidence of something man-made that we left on the moon, like the "descent module" which is supposedly still up there. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 Let's see it. Photos of the moon are very hi-res now. this 1 i posted some time ago, the shills couldnt bear to argue with it, instead the thread no longer exists after i did try many times to discuss their only argument was the presenters voice they cant stand lol but you listen to what he says not how he says it, he is genius and simple to understand..youtube tries to hide this 1 but i found it and posting again, totally exposes the mythbusters talking bullshit [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even though the moon's gravity is only 1/6th that of the earth, HOW DID THEY GET LEAVE THE MOON? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 and someone smarter than me can go look at all the landing sites on the moon, then look at photos of earth from moon surface and calculate, why is the fucking earth so low on the horizon, it doesn’t make sense |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WHy is a moon mission impossible in an Apollo spacecraft? The hardware existed, in some form.It wasn't the hardware that was the problem is was the fact that they couldn't possibly keep anything living alive outside and especially within the Earths magnetosphere and they still can't do it. The density of very high energy protons in the lower portion of the VAB exceeds 7 million particles per cubic centimeters , no matter what anyone tried to tell you if you run a glorified tin can through that with living things inside of it they are going to die in a bath of ionizing radiation and it won't take hours it will take minutes. The result of these particles impacting the metal structure is the production extremely high flux x radiation, this is not conjector or sicence fiction, it is fact. Another interesting fact is the radiation exposure rate of the astronauts of the KNOWN low Earth orbit missions of Apollo spacecraft are virtually identical to those of the "moonlanding" astronauts who not only traversed the van allen radiation belts but also walked around on the moon with highly radioactive soil. This is simply not possible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 04:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even though the moon's gravity is only 1/6th that of the earth, HOW DID THEY GET LEAVE THE MOON? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 and someone smarter than me can go look at all the landing sites on the moon, then look at photos of earth from moon surface and calculate, why is the fucking earth so low on the horizon, it doesn’t make sense what I’m referring to is the famous photo of man holding flag with earth just above flag. The landing site would allow for earth to be so low in the horizon |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 04:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is time that someone provide actual photographic evidence of something man-made that we left on the moon, like the "descent module" which is supposedly still up there. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 Let's see it. Photos of the moon are very hi-res now. this 1 i posted some time ago, the shills couldnt bear to argue with it, instead the thread no longer exists after i did try many times to discuss their only argument was the presenters voice they cant stand lol but you listen to what he says not how he says it, he is genius and simple to understand..youtube tries to hide this 1 but i found it and posting again, totally exposes the mythbusters talking bullshit [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Mythbusters=two J_wish special effects professionals whose job it is to create illusions Those two filthy cunts biggest fuck you to conspiracy theorists was the reflectors on the moon. The Russians did it with robots so fuck you, you two filthy coin clippers. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502542 Australia 04/22/2018 04:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is time that someone provide actual photographic evidence of something man-made that we left on the moon, like the "descent module" which is supposedly still up there. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 Let's see it. Photos of the moon are very hi-res now. this 1 i posted some time ago, the shills couldnt bear to argue with it, instead the thread no longer exists after i did try many times to discuss their only argument was the presenters voice they cant stand lol but you listen to what he says not how he says it, he is genius and simple to understand..youtube tries to hide this 1 but i found it and posting again, totally exposes the mythbusters talking bullshit [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Mythbusters=two J_wish special effects professionals whose job it is to create illusions sure,off course..but watch that video, no shill here can argue with it |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 04:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is time that someone provide actual photographic evidence of something man-made that we left on the moon, like the "descent module" which is supposedly still up there. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 Let's see it. Photos of the moon are very hi-res now. this 1 i posted some time ago, the shills couldnt bear to argue with it, instead the thread no longer exists after i did try many times to discuss their only argument was the presenters voice they cant stand lol but you listen to what he says not how he says it, he is genius and simple to understand..youtube tries to hide this 1 but i found it and posting again, totally exposes the mythbusters talking bullshit [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Mythbusters=two J_wish special effects professionals whose job it is to create illusions Those two filthy cunts biggest fuck you to conspiracy theorists was the reflectors on the moon. The Russians did it with robots so fuck you, you two filthy coin clippers. The very fact that they used corner cube reflectors proves they had no need of any precise alignment. They were designed so no matter what angle light hit them, it is always reflected back the same direction. They could be as much as 50 degrees off and still work FINE, like a mailbox reflector (they are identical) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76502511 United States 04/22/2018 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Russians did the retro reflector by just plopping down a probe on the moons surface. There is no need for any alignment. The Russians also retrieved lunar samples.Apollo had a "Use by" date and it's long since expired and rotted. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 05:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Russians did the retro reflector by just plopping down a probe on the moons surface. There is no need for any alignment. The Russians also retrieved lunar samples.Apollo had a "Use by" date and it's long since expired and rotted. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Look at the dates of the lunar missions and the secret war in Laos (Vietnam side project). They miraculously coincide. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 76260827 Netherlands 04/22/2018 05:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even though the moon's gravity is only 1/6th that of the earth, HOW DID THEY GET LEAVE THE MOON? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 They used a rocket engine. Search Engines. How do the work? It is extremely easy to prove Apollo wasa hoax from a scientific standpoint Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Since nobody has ever done so apparently not. What actually happened is the spacecraft was indeed launched, but the Command service module never left low Earth orbit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 And now you have fantasised invisible spacecraft. Only the third stage /LEM went onto the moon, the LEM being an unmanned probe capable of retrieving samples like the Russians sent , only on a larger scale. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 And now you have invented robotics that doesn't even exist to day. Things you have fantasised are not in fact facts. Only facts can be used in evidence. So far hoaxies have not been able to prove a single relevant claim. 45 years of failure and they are still not getting it. this still doesn't explain why an 8 hour trip with a slight detour took over 72 hours. What did they do, stop at every Stuckeys along the way and buy a pecan log? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Search Term: Gravitational Drag. You are a scientific illiterate trying to discuss orbital mechanics. You not realising how stupid that is makes you extra special stupid. It wasn't the hardware that was the problem is was the fact that they couldn't possibly keep anything living alive outside and especially within the Earths magnetosphere and they still can't do it Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Hoaxies keep ASSerting this. They also keep failing at proving it. Radiation and its effects being yet another subject they are epically ignorant about. "The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen The very fact that they used corner cube reflectors proves they had no need of any precise alignment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 They were designed to be placed by human beings. There is very sturdy chain of evidence that shows them being placed. If YOU claim that evidence was faked than YOU have the burden to prove so. sure,off course..but watch that video, no shill here can argue with it Quoting: Ozzie Coward 76502542 The Blunder From Down Under has been debunked to death. There's a reason he doesn't venture outside his little digital hide-out. He's an intellectual coward he keeps running away from debate with people who actually know what they are talking about. [link to rationalwiki.org (secure)] You guys are getting stale and boring. Don't you have any fresh B.S. we can talk about? Not anything refuted a thousand times? Anyhoo, what do YOU think is Jarrah's strongest point? Are YOU willing to defend it and stick with it? Rather than skedaddle to the next PRATT on the hoaxie playlist when the going gets tough. Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 04/22/2018 05:18 AM Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1505690 Canada 04/22/2018 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to static.afbeeldinguploaden.nl (secure)] I've looked at some of your Hoax-Tard shit, some of it is pretty convincing. But it is propaganda, misinformation, disinformation, and out-of-context most of the time. IMO the U.S. landed men on the Moon, and returned them safely. What they found there has never been disclosed in-full to the American people. So it is probably an attempt at obfuscation by (((Them))) that don't want people to know the truth. . [link to static.afbeeldinguploaden.nl (secure)] Thread: Moon Morontage... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44881304 United States 04/22/2018 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I WATCHED the moon "mission" with my brothers, father & mother, LIVE on TV in July of 1969. We were all passed out in our den when my dad woke us up near 4am to tell us to watch as Neil Armstrong (allegedly) took the first steps. There was no one in the world MORE PROUD than myself & my family & nearly every family in America also watching. I wrote NASA a letter asking for the 'Moon Photos' they provided for free to school children (plus p&h, naturally). I hung those photo posters all over my room, alongside my National Geographic full Blow-Up posters of the moon and the maps of the moon. There is NO ONE ON EARTH WHO DRANK THE KOOLAID ON THIS STORY MORE THAN ME. So please, no that it took MANY MANY YEARS for my to buy "that B.S. that we did not go to the Moon", as i would snap at every single conspiracy theorist who came down the pike....UNTIL I started to do my own, independent reasearch, as you all should do, especially those WHO NEVER QUESTION THE OFFICIAL STORY. Let me ask you this... WHAT ARE THE PROBABLITIES OF NASA JUST HAPPENING TO LOSE ALL THE VIDEO FOOTAGE FROM THE APOLLO 11 MISSION? That is what they are telling people for decades now... THEY LOST ALL THE FRIGGIN FOOTAGE. Ok, if that is credible, what if they told you they just HAPPENED TO LOSE ALL OF THE FRIGGIN SCHEMATICS FOR THE L.E.M. spacecraft, the moon lander? Starting to sound funny? What about the moon rocks which were tested and were found to be ALL FROM EARTH? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1897079 My uncle worked on the LEM. So it is very hard for me to believe they didnt go there. As far as the side thrusters tipping over the LEM, there are also up and down thrusters which could keep it from tipping. Van Allen belts is beyond my knowledge. Why make a hoax? Money, Pride? If we can go to the bottom of the ocean where pressures are 10,000 lbs per sq in it would seem much easier to go to the moon where pressures inside are only 4.5 lbs per sq in. If you look at the Russian LEM ours was 100 times better made. I will admit that our gubmit cant be trusted on anything and is quite evil. So they killed those astronauts for nothing???? If it was a hoax it was one of the best ever done. Wow! So did my dad. All this "we didn't go to the moon" stuff is BS. Lets recap for the "we didn't go to the moon" tards: We faked Apollo 11 We faked Apollo 12 We faked Apollo 13, and threw in an accident for a good story, We faked Apollo 14 We faked Apollo 15 We faked Apollo 16 We faked Apollo 17 REALLY? We faked it 7 TIMES? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 05:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even though the moon's gravity is only 1/6th that of the earth, HOW DID THEY GET LEAVE THE MOON? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76494799 They used a rocket engine. Search Engines. How do the work? It is extremely easy to prove Apollo wasa hoax from a scientific standpoint Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Since nobody has ever done so apparently not. What actually happened is the spacecraft was indeed launched, but the Command service module never left low Earth orbit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 And now you have fantasised invisible spacecraft. Only the third stage /LEM went onto the moon, the LEM being an unmanned probe capable of retrieving samples like the Russians sent , only on a larger scale. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 And now you have invented robotics that doesn't even exist to day. Things you have fantasised are not in fact facts. Only facts can be used in evidence. So far hoaxies have not been able to prove a single relevant claim. 45 years of failure and they are still not getting it. this still doesn't explain why an 8 hour trip with a slight detour took over 72 hours. What did they do, stop at every Stuckeys along the way and buy a pecan log? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Search Term: Gravitational Drag. You are a scientific illiterate trying to discuss orbital mechanics. You not realising how stupid that is makes you extra special stupid. It wasn't the hardware that was the problem is was the fact that they couldn't possibly keep anything living alive outside and especially within the Earths magnetosphere and they still can't do it Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Hoaxies keep ASSerting this. They also keep failing at proving it. Radiation and its effects being yet another subject they are epically ignorant about. "The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen The very fact that they used corner cube reflectors proves they had no need of any precise alignment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 They were designed to be place by human beings. There is very sturdy chain of evidence that shows them being placed. If YOU claim that evidence was faked than YOU have the burden to prove so. sure,off course..but watch that video, no shill here can argue with it Quoting: Ozzie Coward 76502542 The Blunder From Down Under has been debunked to death. There's a reason he doesn't venture outside his little digital hide-out. He's an intellectual coward he keeps running away from debate with people who actually know what they are talking about. [link to rationalwiki.org (secure)] You guys are getting stale and boring. Don't you have any fresh B.S. we can talk about? Not anything refuted a thousand times? Anyhoo, what do YOU think is Jarrah's strongest point? Are YOU willing to defend it and stick with it? Rather than skedaddle to the next PRATT on the hoaxie playlist when the going gets tough. Here’s the answer to a question no one asked, take your pre packaged answers and stick em in your ass fuck boi |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 76260827 Netherlands 04/22/2018 05:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anyhoo, what do YOU think is Jarrah's strongest point? Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Are YOU willing to defend it and stick with it? Rather than skedaddle to the next PRATT on the hoaxie playlist when the going gets tough. Here’s the answer to a question no one asked, take your pre packaged answers and stick em in your ass fuck boi IOW you know you can't. Intellectual cowards, the lot of you. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 05:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anyhoo, what do YOU think is Jarrah's strongest point? Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Are YOU willing to defend it and stick with it? Rather than skedaddle to the next PRATT on the hoaxie playlist when the going gets tough. Here’s the answer to a question no one asked, take your pre packaged answers and stick em in your ass fuck boi IOW you know you can't. Intellectual cowards, the lot of you. :schlock2: Why is the earth so low on the horizon above the flag relative to the actual lunar landing site? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1897079 United States 04/22/2018 05:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 05:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74801056 United States 04/22/2018 05:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1897079 United States 04/22/2018 05:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA creates these red herrings and controlled opposition shills to discredit the truth by making people who disbelieve the Saga look loony, stupid, or uneducated by association. Due to my own efforts throught th FOIA to get access to the Apollo telemtry tapes, they suddenly discovered they were "lost". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 It is extremely easy to prove Apollo wasa hoax from a scientific standpoint and thats why NASA's shills have moved the goalposts calling it a historical achievement that doesn't require critical scientific scrutiny . It's a fable people. The 'USSR" went along with it because the plan has been all along to unite the world under one totalitarian communist government modeled after soviet Russia. The USA moonlanding was meant to create the illusion of one big happy family sharing a HUMAN accomplishment and landing on another planet. Humanity was united in something finally, but it was of course a lie. I know it is a difficult concept to wrap your mind around that the US and the SU could be cooperating towards the same goal with the cold war BS, but they were. The intent, control and motivate through fear to prevent a nationalist revolution in both countries by white Christians, to keep them at odds and fearing each other instead of working together to take control of their own countries. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1897079 United States 04/22/2018 05:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WHy is a moon mission impossible in an Apollo spacecraft? The hardware existed, in some form.It wasn't the hardware that was the problem is was the fact that they couldn't possibly keep anything living alive outside and especially within the Earths magnetosphere and they still can't do it. The density of very high energy protons in the lower portion of the VAB exceeds 7 million particles per cubic centimeters , no matter what anyone tried to tell you if you run a glorified tin can through that with living things inside of it they are going to die in a bath of ionizing radiation and it won't take hours it will take minutes. The result of these particles impacting the metal structure is the production extremely high flux x radiation, this is not conjector or sicence fiction, it is fact. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76502511 Another interesting fact is the radiation exposure rate of the astronauts of the KNOWN low Earth orbit missions of Apollo spacecraft are virtually identical to those of the "moonlanding" astronauts who not only traversed the van allen radiation belts but also walked around on the moon with highly radioactive soil. This is simply not possible. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 76260827 Netherlands 04/22/2018 05:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the earth so low on the horizon above the flag relative to the actual lunar landing site? Quoting: Ozzie Coward 75891879 If you are talking about AS17-134-20384 [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] if you look at Cernan's reflection in Schmitt's visor you can clearly see him kneeling. IOW the camera is angled upward. Search Engines? How do they work? Just one example: [link to www.scientificsonline.com (secure)] "All the designs were destroyed" is one of those lies hoaxies keep regurgitating without ever checking if it is actually true. Hoaxies are notoriously bad at research. As mentioned earlier it is Lunar Module, LM, or lem. Never L.E.M. For some reason lots of people keep getting that wrong. It's a tell-tale for their lack of familiarity with the Apollo record. Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 04/22/2018 05:50 AM Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60325350 United States 04/22/2018 05:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75891879 Australia 04/22/2018 05:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |