Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,692 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 109,676
Pageviews Today: 143,992Threads Today: 34Posts Today: 553
01:06 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Judge Andrew Napolitano (future Supreme?) lays down lawpills on Obamagate
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
Here is sc 1802 that he is referring to:

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—
(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.

READ (B): (B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and

Does this not make it illegal for Obama to wiretap ANY United States citizen?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP