Need a CLEAR, non-CGI, non-photoshoped picture of Earth from space

If you actually know where to look, it isn’t that hard to find plenty of non NASA earth images.

Example.
Amsat AO-40
An amateur radio satellite.

It had an on board camera and it took plenty of pics that me, and many others received using normal radio equipment.

This is the website for the main group that was controlling it, along with plenty of pictures they received from it.

[link to www.jamsat.or.jp]

I think the best picture is this one.

[link to www.jamsat.or.jp]

And that is the full unedited picture, just like i would have recieved if i had decoded the signal with my equipment at home.

For more information on the overal AO-40 platform.

[link to www.phil-mont.org]


And second example is dish earth.
Any dish network subscriber should have been aware of it.
Dish network had a high res camera on one of their satellites and it downlinked a live video feed on one of the channels that any dish subscriber could view.
They did it from 2009 to 2012.
It had it’s “wow” factor for a bit, but got boring after a while.
Dish network finally killed the feed in 2012.

Google “dish earth” and you will find many screen caps of the image that was being down linked.

This reality we're in is flat, should be obvious by now. All of the people saying otherwise are either ignorant, or are paid to gatekeep. Unfortunately most if not all of the mods here belong to the latter.

Thank you anonymous for taking the time to answer my questions in detail and without mockery, very appreciated. I still would like something I can do myself, as in a test that I can touch and/see myself to prove either way as I'm still on the fence with this one.

You do realize the wording is (as the astronauts saw it)
... Also it is believed by many that these images were made by using the round outer rim of the window. which is WHY they are not so easily accepted. Many people want to see the picture with the window also for a comparison. This is why flat earthers deny this one... although its the best shot at support for a real pic of the whole earth in frame with no obstruction allegedly.

Framed by a window in low Earth orbit would not give that large a field of view. And the windows they used most were trapezoidal shaped.

Mount your phone or any digital camera on a tripod.
Take a photo through a red filter.
Take another photo through a green filter.
And one more photo through a blue filter.
Then take a photo without filter.

Next combine the red, green and blue shots in Photoshop or another image processing program.
Compare the result with the photo taken without filter.

.

Define "composite." If by composite you mean composed of images shot through red green and blue filters, then I have news for you. Every digital photograph you have ever taken with a digital camera is a composite. They all use pixels filtered for various colors of light and then combine those images. In consumer cameras this process is hidden from the user and done internally in the camera. The images I linked to are a "composite" in that sense, but so are the images from the cell phone in your pocket.

For the sake of completeness: Even colour negative and colour slide films are composed of three different colour sensitive layers. From a technical view colour negative and colour slide films are composites, too.
Only black and white photos are not composites.

.

Good point.

I am a Globe earth believer but i wonder too that there is no real Picture of the earth. Theres should be thousands by now.

[link to flache-erde.info (secure)]

This Picture doesent help aswell.

My theory is that we cant leave the earth Orbit yet. Theres arge a lot of NASA employees who Said that they cant leave the earth Orbit.




So questions are allowed i guess.

How does the Cologne Cathedral look like?

Like this? [link to www.koelner-dom.de]
Like this? [link to www.ksta.de]
Or like this? [link to www.urlaubsziele.com]
May be like this? [link to www.koelntourismus.de (secure)]

.

I'll say it again:
Man, we need better science education!

I am searching as we speak

[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

There you go.

Here’s a photo of Earth and Mars from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

[link to www.extremetech.com (secure)]

Very cool.

Here’s a photo of Earth from Saturn. It’s very small, but that’s a long distance photo for sure.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Here’s a lot of them, including one real cool one that was taken from beyond the moon by the Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite.

[link to explorer1.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)]

[link to eol.jsc.nasa.gov (secure)]

Have fun.

Dish Network had (still has?) a channel with a live view from one of their satellite cameras. You could verify the weather in your area matched the video.

Since their satellites are in geosynchronous orbit, they show that you do not need to be farther than ~22,000 miles from earth to take a complete picture with a single camera.




.

Its really quite simple.
You cannot prove anything to a flat earther, they call all evidence fake.
Forget that the whole technological world ceases to work in a flat earth scenario, doesn't matter according to their logic.

There is not any form of evidence they will accept ever. They only bat around their circular retarfed logic til you give up and walk away from their crazy deluded ass.
They count that as a win.

Only solution is to not talk with them, ever. If someone expresses that idea, stop talking, do not do business with, do not entertain their fantasy.
I count those folks as dead already, same with devout religious types.

there's a fucking million out there

it's called Nasa.gov

At least you freely admit you are a hopeless, ignorant loser.

"I am 44, huge sci-fi movie fan, playing computer gmes since 1994."

Why does it have to be the whole globe?

With a picture taken from the ISS you can still see it's a sphere.

For chrissakes.... centuries ago, astronomers looked through their telescopes and saw Saturn.... they weren't able to take pictures yet, but they knew damn well what they saw was round.

Handheld or tripod?