Faithful Evolution Believers

You don't understand the word grammar either...

Do you actually consider yourself to be reasonably intelligent?

Who says I don't believe in God? You can believe in Evolution as it doesn't go and disprove God. And you do realize that soft tissue in mineralized conditions can last much longer than a few thousand years, right? The soft tissue exists in a degraded state, but the D.N.A has already decayed beyond use, meaning it must be over 1 million years old, as that's the maximum time for it to remain useful in any form.

Sorry, I'm just off my game today. And it depends on what you mean by intelligent.

I bet you have NEVER typed "definitely"

but have misspelled it as "defiantly" every time you have ever written the word.

But you certainly would never admit such a thing anyway...

But you will remember it now next time.

It fits perfectly.

Your heart is defiance

defiantly.

Defy God.

Defiantly...

Do YOU want PROOF of GOD?

It appears you have no rebuttals any of the things I brought up, and resort to latching onto spelling mistakes and the like. But yeah, definitely just me not knowing my shit about evolution.

Give me proof that God exists. Scientific proof.

Do you want proof of God?

Yes

or No?

If you have the proof show me. I'd like to see.

Or do you NOT WANT?

If there is any way possible

for you to most reasonably conclude and know

that God is real and True

DO YOU WANT TO KNOW?

YES

or

NO?

It is ONLY a question of YOUR WILL.

Do you want to know if GOD is True?

Dude...

[link to thenode.biologists.com]

This picture is a great example of evolution ;)

The fossil record implies that birds come from dinosaurs, and that makes them and alligators closely related as a result, as both are archosaurs. But fossils alone aren't proof of anything, so why not turn to genes. The left skull is a normal chicken embryo, the right an alligator embryo's skull, and the middle skull a chicken embryo which reactivated disabled genes. This is also supported by D.N.A, considering out of all living creatures today, the D.N.A of birds matches those of alligators and crocodiles most closely.

If you can give me any picture or proof of God's existence, then yes, I'll believe in God.

You still have not answered what I have repeatedly specifically asked you.

Not show me. Not I'll look. And I didn't ask you to believe anything.

I asked what you WANT.

You can lead a horse to water, but I'm not gonna fight you, but if you're honest, our paths in this world have crossed for a reason.

I just said. Anything. Give me anything that would prove God's existence. ANYTHING. I don't care about if it's literally bringing God down from the clouds to say "Hi" or just showing me proof that every word of the Bible is correct, just something.

What would you accept as reasonably sufficient proof for the reality of God?

Why does believing in evolution? I can believe in both.

Here, lets start off with a simple story in the Bible, Noah's Ark. How did Noah's Ark fit every single animal on it, and if you believe that dinosaurs and other extinct animals lived during Noah's Flood, how did they fit them on too?

SCIENCE you say...

Statistics? Is that a scientific examination?

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Statistics is a branch of mathematics dealing with the collection, analysis, interpretation, presentation, and organization of data.[1][2] In applying statistics to, e.g., a scientific, industrial, or social problem, it is conventional to begin with a statistical population or a statistical model process to be studied. Populations can be diverse topics such as "all people living in a country" or "every atom composing a crystal". Statistics deals with all aspects of data including the planning of data collection in terms of the design of surveys and experiments.[1] See glossary of probability and statistics.

How about Spinoza's God?

Any verification of his existence. Proof of him creating humans, or some cosmic event that could not happen without divine intervention (say, a star's "evolution" being sped up beyond what science says).