| Users Online Now: 1,466 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 417,450 | |
| Pageviews Today: 632,743 | Threads Today: 235 | Posts Today: 3,107 |
| 07:19 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,466 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 417,450 | |
| Pageviews Today: 632,743 | Threads Today: 235 | Posts Today: 3,107 |
| 07:19 AM | ||
If evolution were true.. | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74848697  United States06/25/2017 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about the missing layer? Where did all that time disappear to? Why are all the layers perfectly flat? Not saying you are wrong just that you my be looking in the wrong place for the truth. The world could be 6000 or 2 billion years old I couldn't say but it doesn't matter. The creating myth is the truth seen by the eyes of those who put in in their own context, humans. But there is something special about our existence here and that won't be fine in a book but out there in other people. You're wrong, it does matter. The story of creation and of the flood in the Bible are true. And the evidence screams of this fact but we have been lied to and the truth is ridiculed. It's ridiculous to assume that barely literate people over 2000 years ago had some insight into Earth science when they could barely make cloth to clothe themselves with. If you believe otherwise, that's great. Just don't expect other people with an IQ above warm bath water to agree with your viewpoint. |
Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537  Canada06/25/2017 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Photine What about the missing layer? Where did all that time disappear to? Why are all the layers perfectly flat? Not saying you are wrong just that you my be looking in the wrong place for the truth. The world could be 6000 or 2 billion years old I couldn't say but it doesn't matter. The creating myth is the truth seen by the eyes of those who put in in their own context, humans. But there is something special about our existence here and that won't be fine in a book but out there in other people. You're wrong, it does matter. The story of creation and of the flood in the Bible are true. And the evidence screams of this fact but we have been lied to and the truth is ridiculed. It's ridiculous to assume that barely literate people over 2000 years ago had some insight into Earth science when they could barely make cloth to clothe themselves with. If you believe otherwise, that's great. Just don't expect other people with an IQ above warm bath water to agree with your viewpoint. The Bible was written through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (God). "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75131326 United States06/25/2017 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74848697 United States06/25/2017 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "A local Native American tribe, the Havasupai, attributes the canyon’s carving to a catastrophic flood down the Colorado River that occurred when the god Ho-ko-ma-ta unleashed a tremendous rainstorm. A more benevolent god, Pu-keh-eh, put his daughter in a hollowed-out log to save her from the monstrous current. After the flood receded, she crawled out and became mother of all humanity." Quoting: Photine  Yea, not seeing that in my Bible. And none of them were around to see it happen, either. Double fail then. |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "A local Native American tribe, the Havasupai, attributes the canyon’s carving to a catastrophic flood down the Colorado River that occurred when the god Ho-ko-ma-ta unleashed a tremendous rainstorm. A more benevolent god, Pu-keh-eh, put his daughter in a hollowed-out log to save her from the monstrous current. After the flood receded, she crawled out and became mother of all humanity." Quoting: Photine Yea, not seeing that in my Bible. And none of them were around to see it happen, either. Double fail then. It points toward the true narrative of Noah and the flood given in the Bible, though. "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "have you ever wondered how the Grand Canyon formed? Since the late 1800s, the standard answer has been that primarily the Colorado River carved the Grand Canyon over millions of years. If that happened, wouldn’t you expect to find a gigantic river delta where the Colorado River enters the Gulf of California? It’s not there. Nor have geologists found it anywhere else. Where did all the dirt go—800 cubic miles of it? [link to www.creationscience.com] Notice the four segments of this river near the center of the picture. Compare the thin river with the canyon’s vast expanse. Could that relatively small river carve such a huge, wide, and deep canyon? If so, why hasn’t the same thing happened along dozens of faster and larger rivers? Why do hundreds of large side canyons, with no visible water source to erode them, enter the Grand Canyon?" Last Edited by Photine on 06/25/2017 07:43 PM "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| LostReality33 User ID: 75086618 United States06/25/2017 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Evolution is Illuminati Propaganda, though the useless eater cattle-herd majority aka goy*m, as we're called by those who created evolution for us to consume, do not perceive it as such. In reality, which the aformentioned cattle-herd are not situated in, but instead are in a fantasy world concocted from hundreds of years of social engineering, Mankind has been DEVOLVING. That has been sufficiently shown to be the case, as you would never get such a large population base of useless eaters that lap up propaganda and ask for more if mankind was NOT suffering from DEVOLUTION. Those who deny DEVOLUTION deny reality. As such, denying DEVOLUTION would be quite on par with the DEVOLVED mental state of Mankind. Of course they deny DEVOLUTION; they are DEVOLVED and do not even perceive it. Dave Eager Explains [the] DEVOLUTION [of Mankind] "I never act without a purpose." -Duke Austerberry "It's a bad time for the world if you're a boy or a girl or maybe something in between, it doesn't matter; we all gotta go green and trust everything the authorities tell us, because they love us and they only want the best for us..." ~Lance Hardcore If you click this thread you can hear Maynard James Keenan of TOOL sing "THE WORLD MUST FEEL THIS SEPTEMBER ELEVEN" 4 months before 9/11 Thread: TOOL The Patient 9/11 REVERSED MUSIC VIDEO "THE WORLD MUST FEEL THIS SEPTEMBER ELEVEN" <---4 MONTHS BEFORE 9/11 I've now got a website up and running exploring this new discovery of the Dark Speech, reversed secrets now revealed NO PERSONAL ADVERTISING to ULTRASONIC REVERSE SPEECH ANALYSIS CHANNEL: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Subscribe to DARK SPEECH DECODER CHANNEL: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Subscribe to the JOHNNY DARK SPEAK CHANNEL: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Get in on The Extreme Reality Puppet Show! [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] "This videocast offers unique and never-before-heard information coming to you direct from ONE EPIC NAME on the INWO scene; David Eager. The Extreme Reality Puppet Show is the FIRST, BEST & ONLY Conspiracy Puppet Show IN THE WORLD! TELL ALL YOUR FRIENDS!" The time is NOW! |
| Matrix User ID: 63827002  Australia06/25/2017 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The only thing evolving on this planet is the doom. Even the scientists who preach their science and progress work more on evolving the doom, while hardly any of them work on evolving life. They preach on how life evolved, yet prove it by doing the opposite evolving the doom. From the sharpened stick to the creation of the A bomb they work more on killing people and the planet and far less on helping mankind and sustaining the planet. If we evolved from monkeys, then why does mankind kill billions of tress to make progress? Monkeys live and treat trees as sacred, yet every chance mankind gets they cut them down in droves, yet claim they are part of the primate family, so you lot are fucked in the head, and so the plant suffers from this madness, life evolving; my a$$....:woot: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75124165 Australia06/25/2017 08:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In the cambrIan period we don't see birds, mammals, reptiles, insects or amphibians. They appear later in the fossil record in a sequence that is consistent with evolution theory. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75124165 "The Cambrian period, part of the Paleozoic era, produced the most intense burst of evolution ever known. The Cambrian Explosion saw an incredible diversity of life emerge, including many major animal groups alive today. Among them were the chordates, to which vertebrates (animals with backbones) such as humans belong." [link to www.nationalgeographic.com] Nothing in your post contradicts me. We see basic chordates in the cambrian, which are fish. We see no tetrapods (4 legged land vertebrates). We see no amphibians, reptiles, mammals or birds, which are all different kinds of chordates. We see underwater arthropods, but no insects, arachnids or modern crustaceans. This is consistent with the idea that all vertebrates descended from the chordates we see in the cambrian. I don't believe in your version of history. Also, I am saying that life has ALWAYS been highly advanced. There was no era of the fish, LOL. I never told you my version of history, I'm telling you what exists in the cambrian fossil record. There are precambrian fossils of simpler organisms. Fish, are the only chordates in the cambrian. I'm telling you the cambrian fossil record doesn't refute evolution. |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm telling you the cambrian fossil record doesn't refute evolution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75124165 Yes it does, because evolution states that in the beginning, we should find simple, basic life forms, but we don't, we find extremely advanced, modern life forms we see today. "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43557374 United States06/25/2017 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, no where in the universe do we see things becoming more ordered. Things don't spontaneously assemble themselves. If you found a watch in the wreckage of the house after a tornado, would you think the watch assembled itself from bits of metal in the tornado? Of course not. But a watch is ridiculously simple compared to even a single celled organism. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 09:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm telling you the cambrian fossil record doesn't refute evolution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75124165 Yes it does, because evolution states that in the beginning, we should find simple, basic life forms, but we don't, we find extremely advanced, modern life forms we see today. The cambrian is not the beginning. Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Life was here about 3 billion years ago. Very simple organisms. Cambrian explosion was 500 million years ago. No land animals existed yet in the cambrian explosion. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, no where in the universe do we see things becoming more ordered. Things don't spontaneously assemble themselves. If you found a watch in the wreckage of the house after a tornado, would you think the watch assembled itself from bits of metal in the tornado? Of course not. But a watch is ridiculously simple compared to even a single celled organism. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43557374 A watch is not biological |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75142744 United States06/25/2017 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's ridiculous to assume that barely literate people over 2000 years ago had some insight into Earth science when they could barely make cloth to clothe themselves with. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74848697 If you believe otherwise, that's great. Just don't expect other people with an IQ above warm bath water to agree with your viewpoint. You don't believe God's Word is God's Word. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The only thing evolving on this planet is the doom. Even the scientists who preach their science and progress work more on evolving the doom, while hardly any of them work on evolving life. They preach on how life evolved, yet prove it by doing the opposite evolving the doom. From the sharpened stick to the creation of the A bomb they work more on killing people and the planet and far less on helping mankind and sustaining the planet. If we evolved from monkeys, then why does mankind kill billions of tress to make progress? Monkeys live and treat trees as sacred, yet every chance mankind gets they cut them down in droves, yet claim they are part of the primate family, so you lot are fucked in the head, and so the plant suffers from this madness, life evolving; my a$$....:woot: Quoting: Matrix 63827002 WHY are you against evolution when you don't have a single clue about it.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75142744 United States06/25/2017 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't know that. You believe that. That's what your preachers have told you. How old do you believe the dinosaurs are? Birds are descendants of dinosaurs. They are classified as avian dinosaurs. If non avian dinosaurs were around in the last million years they would have found DNA in at least some of them. Yet we only see DNA in species that were around in the last million years. The collagen in the t-rex bones matched with bird collagen, specifically chicken and ostrich collagen. And then less of a match with crocodiles. Why would your god create dinosaurs and then make them extinct a few thousand years later? Not to mention 99% of life that has gone extinct. Why would he make tons of super volcanos erupt within a few thousand years? Schweitzer hates you people for using this as evidence for young earth. She is a christian. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't know that. You believe that. That's what your preachers have told you. How old do you believe the dinosaurs are? Multiple fields of science supports that earth is billions of years old. And when you look at the sky at night, you are looking back in time millions and billions of years. Some are millions of light years away and some a billions and some are thousands. It takes light 1 year to travel 1 light year. Use your brain for once. |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | False. Why would your god create dinosaurs and then make them extinct a few thousand years later? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75139669 Why would God create man only to flood the entire world killing everybody save for one family? "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | False. Why would your god create dinosaurs and then make them extinct a few thousand years later? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75139669 Why would God create man only to flood the entire world killing everybody save for one family? Exactly... Considering he is all knowing and outside of time.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't know that. You believe that. That's what your preachers have told you. How old do you believe the dinosaurs are? Multiple fields of science supports that earth is billions of years old. And when you look at the sky at night, you are looking back in time millions and billions of years. Some are millions of light years away and some a billions and some are thousands. It takes light 1 year to travel 1 light year. Use your brain for once. Stars, that is. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75139669 Australia06/25/2017 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | False. Why would your god create dinosaurs and then make them extinct a few thousand years later? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75139669 Why would God create man only to flood the entire world killing everybody save for one family? Exactly... Considering he is all knowing and outside of time.... Man has free will. The world became fully sinful, though. Dinosaur and man coexisted prior to the flood, and perhaps, there were some surving dinos for quite sometime after the flood. Dinosaurs did not kill and eat each other. They ate fruits and plants. T rex was not an "apex predator" like a wolf, lol. He would have been a disastrous hunter. "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75142744 United States06/25/2017 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't know that. You believe that. That's what your preachers have told you. How old do you believe the dinosaurs are? Multiple fields of science supports that earth is billions of years old. And when you look at the sky at night, you are looking back in time millions and billions of years. Some are millions of light years away and some a billions and some are thousands. It takes light 1 year to travel 1 light year. Use your brain for once. Just one point here for your consideration now and then. Einstein taught us that time is a relative physical property. Do you understand that? Ponder that some time... Time is a relative physical property... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75142744 United States06/25/2017 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Finally. Please delete those three. ^ Multiple fields of science supports that earth is billions of years old. And when you look at the sky at night, you are looking back in time millions and billions of years. Some are millions of light years away and some a billions and some are thousands. It takes light 1 year to travel 1 light year. Use your brain for once. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75139669 Stars, that is. Are you aware that it has recently been discovered and understood that the speed of light is slowing down? Ponder that one for awhile too.... If you use your brain, that is... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72927911 United States06/25/2017 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a fact that all the major phyla appear simultaneously in the fossil record. And this fact points toward creation, not evolution. Quoting: Photine Regarding this issue, Charles Darwin himself admitted: “The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.” maybe you ought to consider what event spurred such a simultaneous fossil record just a thought |
| Photine (OP) User ID: 73410537 Canada06/25/2017 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a fact that all the major phyla appear simultaneously in the fossil record. And this fact points toward creation, not evolution. Quoting: Photine Regarding this issue, Charles Darwin himself admitted: “The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.” maybe you ought to consider what event spurred such a simultaneous fossil record just a thought ??? "For the Lord God shall not do anything, unless first he tell his secret, or his private plans to his servants, the prophets." Amos 3:7 WYC |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73181990 United States06/25/2017 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
