Apollo moon landing 10,000 lbs thrust: Opsssss...... is the lunar surface paved with concrete or powder soft silicon?

Capable of 10,000 pounds of thrust but throttled down to about 1,500 as they were landing. If it was running at 10,000 then the lander would be going up.

No blast marks, no dust on the feet of the lander...

I'm surprised all of the scotch tape and curtain rods didn't come apart either

No it would blow right past the ladder. Guess those nice astronuts must have politely swept the dust back into the crater, from hundreds of yards out? Guests must make a good impression on the Man in the Moon right?


Last Edited by DGN on 09/23/2017 11:39 PM

Nice how you just ignore the fact that you screwed up thinking it was 10,000 pounds of thrust. Just gish gallop on to the next crap to throw at the wall, right?

Prove there should be a crater. Helicopters and the Harrier make vertical landings on Earth with far greater thrust and don't make craters.

We DO see however that the loose dust underneath was scoured away in a radial pattern. But no crater as there shouldn't be one.

Dude, I'm laughing out loud at the oriental guys commentary, good stuff!
Thanks for posting!

opssss.... who forgot to slow mo the camera while Neil jumps off the LEM?

Oh BTW who was filming that?


Last Edited by DGN on 09/23/2017 11:55 PM

Best part is that millions of people still believe it happened to this day.

Flouride ate their brains

Please.. these tested these landers right here where everyone could see them working just fine, right?

I watched it live and totally believed it, back when the White House was holy and the Commander and Chief was divine

Dust, dirt, sand or whatever makes up the moon enviorment isn't going to act like dust does here because there's no atmosphere on the moon.

That’s a good point. He falls pretty hard to the ground climbing down that ladder. But in the rest of the vid they are bouncing around like light weights.
It’s like it was filmed in a studio or something.

Remember, they left footprints on the moon too.

Yes strange the rocket thrust didn't. Too late to rake out the blast radius right NASA?

Strange they can only jump one foot up in 1/6 gravity, maybe the mysterious camera man filming the first step on the moon can explain?

Last Edited by DGN on 09/24/2017 01:42 AM

So NASA who do you suppose filmed the 'first step', while the other two astronuts were in the LEM?

right in the studio, they did.

No slow mo is ever used so nobody forgot it. We know it wasn't used because when the footage is sped up their arms move way too fast. the footage also had live interaction with mission control. Can't do that with slow motion at the same time.

As for how filmed it, the video you posted shows clips from all missions and on each, they set up a video camera that nobody had to hold. On Apollo 15-17 that camera was attached to the rover and remotely operated from mission control. On others it was mounted on a tripod.

Thank you for showing your ignorance.

and you prove your massive ignorance AGAIN.
The first steps were filmed with a camera prepositioned on the MESA which was lowered by lanyard before Armstrong started down the ladder.
and there was only one other astronaut in the LM. The third was in orbit.

Basic mistakes like that show you either never research anything outside of hoaxie sites or you're just a troll. I'm thinking it is a combo of both.

"The first steps were filmed with a camera prepositioned on the MESA which was lowered by lanyard before Armstrong started down the ladder." looks to me the first picture is a close up in the dark then it's suddenly a hundred feet away, and he's in the floodlights.

I like the floods lights in the back round but they should at least have gotten the shadow going parallel.

Last Edited by DGN on 09/24/2017 11:24 AM

You're comparing footage from two different missions at two different times. You really are that stupid, aren't you?

yeah

yeah

Look at cars from 1969 like the Ferrari Dino or the Lamborghini Miura or even the Holden Hurricane that was built by a small Aussie car company [link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

What about the concord, sleek seamless design and the first plane took off in 1969 and could travel twice the speed of sound.

You would have thought they would have engaged either one of these teams to build the fake Lunar Lander but no they get a bunch of stage hacks to throw together a prop that is made from sheet metal, press studs, kaptan tape, curtain rods, pipe insulation and cardboard. They didn't even try, yet the world still bought it.

Now think about this for a second, if people are stupid enough to believe (or not question) a fake lunar lander made from sticky tape and string what else do they believe that is not real.

The world as we know it is not what it appears.

They were wearing bulky suits with backpacks, so they were not very maneuverable.

You would expect them to move slowly and cautiously if they were really on the Moon. After all, if they made a mistake, it could puncture the suit, or otherwise damage their life support systems. One false move and they might be dead.

So, it would be a sign of fakery if they actually did clown around while on the Moon.

The LM was protected inside a shroud when the rocket was launched. Why would it need to be aerodynamic to land on the Moon where there is no air?

Why would they want to have the extra weight of having a sleek body? To protect it from the Moon wind or from getting wet in the Moon rain?

No matter where on the interwebs I go, Canadians are always the dumbest motherfuckers there.