They are following Albert Pike's plan for WW3

CANE WE PINE THIS

Luciferians, its a pity nobody listens to me, ah well

The letter is a fake. It uses terms that wouldn't even be coined for another 50 years.

Unless Pike was a time traveler too.

What terms?

^^THIS^^

Insert pic of Morgan here

Nazism for one.
If the letter was written in 1871 and Nazi as used in the letter wasn't in use until the 1910s, how could Pike have known that term?? It would be like someone in Britain in the 40s talking about the BNP.

Well, this Pike interpretation does only describe one side of the coin - the inferior side of history - yet there is parallely also the Superior Side of History at work - hidden in plain sight - yet more than real and full of winning ...

Fake or not it is happening just like it predicts.


So your aurgument is this: You find a note that says "Bobby is going to kidnap and hang Suzy upside down in a old mine shaft in southern TN."

Everyone says "Thats fake!" "Thats fake!"

Suzy goes missing. Then you find Suzy hanging upside down in an old mine shaft in southern TN. And instead of looking for Bobby you just continue on about the letter being fake.

More critical thinking is required of you or you are new here.

So whoever wrote the script also controls the screen play or is psychic.

The letter also talks about World War One and Two.

World War One was only referred to as the Great War or the War to End All Wars until World War Two.

Letter is such an obvious fake that it seems it is only used to discredit investigation into conspiracies.

OP is right.
The goal of WW3 is to eliminate religion.
The powers that be have been planting seeds for this for a long time.

You have it backwards.

Bobby kidnaps Suzy. Someone writes a letter dating it prior to the kidnap then holds it up and says, 'Look, my letter predicted the kidnap'.

The letter also contains 50 other claims and uses the 'prediction' of the kidnap as proof the letter writer is either psychic or has an insight into secrets.

The Mystery of Albert Pike: Satanist, Racist or Great Man?

April 23, 2016 By davidjones
By ROBERT GUFFEY

The enigma of Albert Pike is a persistent one. Certain facts are known about him, facts that detractors and supporters alike can both agree upon. He’s a little-known figure whose impact upon American history far exceeds his notoriety. He single-handedly created the higher degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry (degrees 4 through 33). He was Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of Scottish Rite Freemasonry from 1859 to 1891, the year of his death. He was a Confederate General during the American Civil War. He was a powerful attorney in his day. He was also a prominent poet, whose literary works have been forgotten except by a small handful of devotees. He is the author of the most important work on Masonic ritual, philosophy and symbolism, i.e., Morals and Dogma.

On these facts, everyone can agree. It’s the interpretation of these facts that begin to grow a bit misty.

Pike is a polarising figure. There seems to be very little objective analysis of his impact on history. Mainstream historians rarely, if ever, refer to him. Therefore, we are left with volumes of questionable interpretations that often draw upon half-truths, rumours, innuendoes, misinterpretations, and outright forgeries. Pick up any book that contains even a minor reference to the man and you will find that the interpretation of the author either falls into one of two categories: 1) Pike was a genius and a Saint whose very touch turned men’s souls into alchemical gold, or 2) Pike was a Satan worshipper whose noxious acts still stain the very heart of the United States of America – indeed, the very world itself.

There is no middle ground among these ‘researchers’. Pike was either good or evil. Of course, the world would be much simpler if anyone was wholly good or wholly evil. Zen Buddhist Alan Watts once wrote a book entitled The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are in which he advises his readers to drop that dialectic way of thinking, what he calls “the game of Black-versus-White.”1 It only causes confusion because it is a model that does not reflect reality. Human beings are far more complicated than that, and this includes Pike.

With most historical figures, the latter statement could normally go unsaid, but strange as it is to say a very small minority of pundits have indeed implied Albert Pike was not human at all (he was really a shape-shifting reptilian in disguise). I’m going to immediately crawl out on a limb, right here in the fifth paragraph, and propose we eliminate that theory for lack of evidence.

But first, picture a scene for me, if you will. Picture an underground train depot, a twisted set of metal tracks sunk about ten feet into the concrete. On either side of the tracks people are yelling at each other: men, women, children… all races, all creeds. Strangely, some of the people who are shouting the loudest have no faces at all. A giant bronze bust of Pike is sitting in the middle of the tracks. In the distance, a train is barrelling down upon this immense monument. The train is so loud, nobody can hear what anyone else is saying.

Let’s slow this scene for a moment, turn the volume down on the train, and turn up the volume only on certain individuals… just one at a time. There’s no preferred order amidst this chaos. We’ll select our speakers at random….
Pike as Satanist

Ralph Epperson, a Fundamentalist Christian and author of the book The New World Order, concluded that Albert Pike was a Satanist whose secret goal was to stamp out all organised religions in the world. (But isn’t Satanism itself an organised religion? Oh, wait, sorry about that. Let’s leave aside editorial intrusions for a moment and just examine the claims.) Here’s Epperson in his own words:

…Pike considers Lucifer to be the God that is good, and the God of the Bible is the devil, the god of evil. That is what [Pike’s] statement about ‘that which is Below is as that which is Above’ means. That means that the God in the heavens is the god that is below, and the god who is below is the god in the heavens.

So the Masons do believe in a god: it is in the fallen lightbearer, Lucifer. There can be no other reasonable explanation of what Mr. Pike just wrote.2

No other reasonable explanation? This is a common belief among Christians, particularly the Fundamentalists, many of whom are very concerned about the ongoing “threat” of Freemasonry. Most people reading this magazine will no doubt already be aware of the fact that the hermetic dictum “As above, so below” is a common phrase among the ancient practitioners of alchemy and does not refer in any way to either God or Satan. In fact, the belief systems associated with alchemy no doubt existed long before the Christian religion even came into being. But when one is viewing the world through a limited framework, the amount of information one has to draw upon will be equally limited… and thus may lead to numerous misperceptions, like the one we’ve just heard.

Now let’s pan over to the other side of the tracks, shall we?
Pike as “Oracle of Freemasonry”

Manly P. Hall, a 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemason who wrote scores of books attempting to illuminate the esoteric meanings of Masonic symbolism (The Secret Teachings of All Ages being the most exhaustive) seems to have an endless supply of adoring adjectives to describe Albert Pike. He variously refers to Pike as “the Plato of Freemasonry,” “this Masonic Prometheus,” “the Homer of America,” “the Master Builder,” “the Real Master of the Veils,” “the Oracle of Freemasonry,” and (perhaps most confusing) “the Zoroaster of modern Asia.”3 And that’s just scraping the surface.

Hall chooses to introduce Pike in his illustrated review of occultism and philosophy, The Phoenix, with the following anonymous tribute:

Albert Pike was a king among men by the divine right of merit. A giant in body, in brain, in heart and in soul. So majestic in appearance that whenever he moved on highway or byway, the wide world over, every passer-by turned to gaze upon him and admire him. Six feet, two inches, with the proportions of a Hercules and the grace of an Apollo. A face and head massive and leonine, recalling in every feature some sculptor’s dream of a Grecian god…. 4

Hall does not mention who wrote the preceding tribute or where it was originally published. It’s hard to imagine what sort of prostrate position the writer was in when these words flowed from his (or her) pen. Perhaps Pike himself wrote it. Or maybe even Manly P. Hall. When it comes to attribution in Hall’s writing, everything’s in doubt. He had a bad habit of being rather too lackadaisical about citing his sources – a habit he shared with Pike himself. For this reason alone much of his writing is considered useless by mainstream historians, and I understand their dismissal of him on those grounds. But it could be that Hall didn’t want his work to be useful to historians. Like Pike himself, Hall was interested in history only on his own terms, and those terms involved the practice and explication of metaphysics. Every aspect of the mundane world somehow related back to the big Masonic “G” – whether that G stood for the initial letter of the Hebrew alphabet, “Geparaith,” “God,” “Geometry,” or “the generative principle” is entirely open to interpretation. Pike cites them all as possible candidates. (On pages 780, 640, 40, and 632 of Morals and Dogma, respectively.)

Hall saw himself reflected in Pike and came to admire him accordingly. They were both pre-eminent scholars of the arcanum, perhaps the most knowledgeable of their respective centuries who chose to compile their occult knowledge in encyclopedic works, and therefore it might be no surprise that Hall would place Pike on such a lofty pedestal. And here we come to an important point about the enigma of Albert Pike: because so much of Pike’s real life and career is shrouded in mystery, it’s easy for him to become a polymorphous Rorschach blot upon which people with an intense interest in the esoteric can project their own highest hopes or darkest fears.
Conflicting Portrayals

In a Labor Day lecture delivered to the Schiller Institute in Washington, D.C., Anton Chaitkin (author of Treason in America) delineated what he called “the Scottish Rite’s KKK Project” by attempting to connect Pike to the founding of the Ku Klux Klan. He said:

The Knights of the Ku Klux Klan was a terrorist counterattack, beginning in Tennessee, designed to block Reconstruction and reverse the outcome of the Civil War. The Klan and the Scottish Rite were one and the same enterprise, continuing the imperial effort behind the slave owners’ rebellion. 5

But to James T. Tresner II, author of the anecdotal biography Albert Pike: The Man Beyond the Monument, Pike is nothing less than…

…one of the most amazing men who has ever lived. During his long life, he was a teacher, an explorer of the American frontier, a poet, a newspaper editor, a lawyer – in fact he is still regarded as one of the outstanding legal scholars of the 1800s – a short-story writer, a linguist, a worker for reform in both education and the criminal justice system, an active advocate for the rights of women and the rights of Native Americans, an orator whose speeches are still reprinted in collections of Southern literature, a general in the Civil War, and a philosopher.

He made and gave away fortunes. He built the finest home in Little Rock, Arkansas. The society columns of the Washington, D.C. newspapers spoke of him as one of the most graceful dancers, cordial hosts, and knowledgeable connoisseurs of food in the capital city. He always had a joke to tell his legion of friends, and his hearty laugh was famous.

When, in the last years of his life, he moved to an apartment in the House of the Temple, his personal library contained thousands of books. He was a profound student of religion and philosophy.6

Continue to read:

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

The 50 others claims are happening or ongoing. So like i said whoever wrote the script is also controlling the screen play. Question is, why make the Masons the scapegoat? Who stands to benefit? The same organization that genocided the Templars?

Think about this. This organization has such power that they will contol the script and outcome. Doesnt your fake letter coincide with the Catholic prophecy of this bieng the last Pope. Do you think they will go quietly into the night and let thier prophesy be known as bullshit?

They will use this to destroy Masonry because Masonry has always been against the enslavement of Mans mind which is in direct contradiction to the control of the Church.

Thats why they use lucifer in the letter which they will later destroy. Or the Masons are in control and they will finally destroy the Church.

What a great show this will be. The final battle is upon us.

What side shall you choose. The Masons? The Church? Free will or enslavement?

So ask yourself this. If every man who founded the greatest nation on earth was a Mason why aren't I a Mason as well?

Are you kiddin me??? REALLY???
They are the ones who created RELIGIONS!!!!!
Religion means "to bind or tie back"....

Religion is what keeps the chaos going fella, you think they covered all the bases and not that one??
Thru religion, do you think the world has gotten safer and more peaceful??
IT is LIES....ALL LIES and unless you wake from your stupor, you will die in the lies they fed you.....

That was debunked long ago.

Its getting interesting isn't it? I always thought masons where good people and Vatican where bad but I dunno? Just as well that I am the truth, the way, the life.

the letter is a hoax

like the protocol of zion

but both articles are also true though their purported authorship is hoaxed


That is another tactic these assholes use.

They wrap the truth up in a turd.

Yeah, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Both magically exactly right, many years before events, but hey, this asshole says it's debunked! I bet you use snopes to figure it out huh?

Don't believe any asshole who says a one liner like that, check for yourself. People like him want to prevent you from thinking, ignore the stupid, it burns.

Yes. Every single document that talks about Secrets is called a Hoax by the ones who want it secret.

It's not a hoax if IT'S FUCKING RIGHT.

Fake, you say, yet aren't things happening exactly as the letter predicted?

It must be the most accurate fake letter of all time.

It's not Albert Pike's plan. It's the Roman Empire's plan to make you beg for a world monarchy.

Then read Pikes book "Morals and Dogma", its in there too. Fucking Frogs were at the heart of Masonry, you a Mason, Froggy? Denial would be your job then.

Look at what I wrote.

The content is not the hoax.

The author is. And it is easily provable that the authorship is hoaxed. They do that to discourage to more intelligent who tend to be the more skeptical - so not targeted at you.


The people calling it a hoax are the people who wrote it. they know that if you try to prove authorship you will fail.


I am showing you their tactics here. maybe it is a bit too much for you.

It's "Pin" NOT "PINE" - get your spelling right!

Pine is a species of tree!

that he wrote one thing does not prove that he wrote another thing

logic fail

he did not write it

I've heard that too ~ but whether he said these things exactly as we read it ~ or if someone updated the terms later - someone wrote this a long time ago - and it seems to be playing out.

this explains it

Thread: we shall unleash the nihilists!