Stephen Hawking: Earth Will Become A Flaming Ball Of Fire By 2600

Hawkings is a stooge for the psycho elite and it's a brilliant strategy. How dare anyone criticize a crippled "genius".

there is no black holes

the rest is history

It's almost as if he is some type of Disney animation now that just spits out nonsense.

LOL, ok buddy. Go back to playing a scientist on TV.

nasa faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noon time, which is not morning time as they said/should.

nasa, china, japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.

they lied right in front your eyes.

if light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?

all space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.

light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.

so any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.

all scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.

if light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how we map the universe and measure the total mass?

it is all bs, all lies.

there is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?

van allan belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.

near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.

so between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.

em drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science.

ligo detected gravity wave? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode.

gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.

People believe in this obvious fraud?
Are people really that stoooopid??!!

It's physically IMPOSSIBLE to live 51 years with ALS!
People with ALS live TWO to FOUR years.

If you look at old photos..the dude is COMPLETELY different. So different, that the elite must be laughing their asses off that the sheep don't see it.

He just mad he's a cripple.

How do we know these are Hawkings thoughts? I mean, it's a computer, that someone else has programmed what to say.

I think Hawking is being kept alive and used to be honest.

The second coming will happen long before the year 2600.

Hawkins is NOT a stooge for TPTB. Hawkins is TPTB. It's the perfect cover. Even the smartest conspiracy theorists would never figure it out! I have figured it out, however, because I'm a fucken moran. It's that simple, people! Wake up!

i will be long dead, who cares

Ha Ha

King Arthur Merlin jumps the shark.... episode 45,678.

Last Edited by Undestroyer on 11/08/2017 10:37 AM

I would back any project turning Hawking's wheelchair into a flaming rocket, blasting off into space, never to be seen again. Peace on Earth, finally.

Hawking: Stupid, self-important git having turned his illness into a marketing machine.

How DARE you criticize a cripple. I'll bet you're a racist and antisemite as well.

Actually, this pisses me off royally. I have a relative who died a gruesome death from ALS. If people actually CAN live for 50 years like this, why did my relative have to die? Why is no one even asking this obvious question?

I'm sure he's a fraud, of course. Thanks for your comment.

This is EXACTLY the recipe they use to brainwash the masses.

They put forth a VICTIM to push whatever agenda they want

Victim mentality is powerful.


1) People automatically sympathize with victims and give them a platform. People will typically NOT challenge a victim. Because victims are immediately assumed to be telling the truth. (Who wants to suffer and be a victim? So people assume people wouldn't lie about being a victim..therefore they are to believed about everything.)

2) Victims are underdogs. People naturally root for the underdogs. We are hard wired to protect and nurture children...who are technically underdogs in life.

Look at every major false flag. These mass murders bring about massive mental and emotional trauma in the population. Then they wheel out the "victims" to push whichever agenda they want of the week.

Stephen Hawking is a perfect psyops for them. People will not challenge HIM or WHAT he has to say... because he's a victim. And victims are to be believed.

Victims are NOT accountable and NOT responsible for anything.

And anyone who challenges a victim is pounced upon.

If it came out tomorrow that everything Stephen Hawking has said was a big fat lie...people would shelter him from any blow-back and make excuses for him.


.

Aww.... someones feeling inadequate cause they don't understand the funny numbers and letters....

Steven Hawking is an idiot. Plain amd simple, along with those who give him any credibility.

This guy is starting to get under my skin. I realize he's a brilliant man, but he's been stepping outside of his field a little too often. Besides, everyone knows we're destroying the planet.

How about he actually spends a little time and develop a plan of action that everyone can agree on.

This is what I said with more words.
:-)

Where would be a safe place to relocate? I dont want to burn up.

Not to worry. The earth will shed itself of its disease ( mankind) its only natural. As the population increases, less resources, and more chances for deadly diseases to spread.

I agree how else are we going to escape the killer robots and mad climate augmentation experiments gone wrong.


Not to mention the immortal hillary overlord that is here to help us.

Stephen Hawkin is a silicon constructed puppet like they use in movies, with an electronic voice that is also operated by a real human off scene.

Hawkin himself passed away long ago from his disease.

SH is a Cosmologist and Astro Physicist
Outside of his speciality areas his comments in other areas are as valid as 99% of the posts here --- nonsense and drivel .

He has not the remotest idea what will happen next week , let alone in 2600 .
On the other hand , I could let you have details of my visions if you post me -----------

Empirical evidence for this claim?

None.

QED.

Hawking is a pervert

Hawking is a satanic liar with an agenda

Hawkings died and was replaced a long time ago. And earth is not a ball. Fear mongering never stops 24/7/365.

Baba Vanga says otherwise

This might be true. However, Progressive Liberal greenies are using this planetary emergency to push their Globalization agenda. And they seem to have zero problem falsifying the scientific record. This is just another Democrat Vote Harvesting Scheme, instead of dividing people by skin color they do it through environmental beliefs. Progressive Liberals are the real criminals:


How Government Twists Climate Statistics

Former Obama Energy Department Undersecretary Steven Koonin on how bureaucrats spin scientific data.

[link to www.wsj.com]

Why do they do this:

How Climate Alarmism Advances International Political Agendas:

A remark from Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”

Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of state for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.)

Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department said: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”

In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment, told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

Speaking at the 2000 U.N. Conference on Climate Change in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France explained why the IPCC’s climate initiative supported a key Western European Kyoto Protocol objective: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”


The late Stephen Schneider, who authored The Genesis Strategy, a 1976 book warning that global cooling risks posed a threat to humanity, later changed that view 180 degrees, serving as a lead author for important parts of three sequential IPCC reports. In a quotation published in Discover, he said: “On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, on the other hand, we are not just scientists, but human beings as well. And like most people, we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that, we need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of the doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”

----- and it continues on, into the present era-----

Angela Merkel, at her press conference (about Trump leaving the Paris Climate Accord), said, “This Paris climate accord is not just some accord or the other. It is a central accord in defining the contours of globalization.” Strange she does not bring up the global catastrophe facing mankind here.

[link to www.forbes.com (secure)]

It is apparent that the Democrats want to create enough fear that their "green voters" will continue to vote Democratic, but not so much fear that this group starts to interfere with their corporate backers and go off and form a third party with Bernie Sanders. In other words, some fear is good, but too much fear is undesirable.