plus Offer Upgrade
User ID: 70208827
Hong Kong 11/23/2017 04:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is the coyness and subtlety of women a shit test? Since the purpose of shit tests is for women to determine which men are worth their time, who can argue that the the coyness and subtlety of women is not a shit test? I have seen women write about it online before. If a man won't take the initiative and persue them, then the man isn't worthy of them. I have no problem with that at all. I treat people in a similar way myself, so I can't complain when people treat me that way. (I don't do it through games but through observation and intuition.) I think I need to see a therapist to get over this. I can't get over the fact that shit tests are games, and women shit test men constantly. I can't even think of any of this as being real anymore. Games are not real life. Games are simulacra of real life. That's why I'm not trying to have any friendships with women right now outside of my romantic relationship. Games drive me crazy. (My girlfriend doesn't play games.) Last Edited by plus on 11/23/2017 04:18 AM |
plus (OP)
User ID: 70208827
Hong Kong 11/23/2017 04:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the coyness and subtlety of women a shit test? The problem with starting a relationship off with a shit test/game is that it ruins the foundation of any relationship which is trust.
How do you trust someone when you know that they're toying with you from the first moment?
I don't think I can do that, and I don't think it's wise either. |