Has anyone figured out that double slit experiment

Why do the results change? Why can't they be the same for each person?

Yeah it's down to observation and thus most likely we are living in a simulation. Most frown at this as they think in current technological terms and fail to think given another 10,000 or 1 billion years what we'd be capable of graphically or simulation wise. Think how in the last 100 years we went from NO computers and graphics to now....

...Now project forward 10,000 years...

Your welcome

If you put something into an envelope it no longer exists until you pull it back out of the envelope. This is why in honest times a stamp was only a penny.

Yeppers.

All of this, wars, politics, power-over-others, technology

- only to find out my hunter-gatherer forefathers and mothers
were right, before the Swedish King's soldiers and priests
came.

Existence is fractal in nature.
Being is being.

The world is nowhere but in the user interface.
Collapsing potential into function is what consciousness
is/does. Creation is an ever ongoing thing.

The aliens can tell you nothing.
If you're not happy, why, then you must be blue.



The shamans job was not to serve you dogma or goddamn pussy
"salvation". From what? Grow some balls instead. Listen to
the Old Ones of your own people, ffs.
Learn your Real Name.

Whatcha need foreign gods from distant desert goat shepherd
folks for?

Vitun pellet.
Giganormous mind-fucks about, I say.



F**k, I love Suomi-Finland

I have been a software develop from the first days of the PC. With many advanced software languages you can spinoff, or create, new processes that run a computer program independently.... on its own.

It can take milliseconds to launch the new process and allocate memory for it and sometimes that is too long,,, So developers often create a new process, let it run the software required to complete its task, and then, instead of killing the process off or letting it die off, they pause it and reuse it later... because it is quicker than creating a new one.

Create. Kill. Die.

The interesting part of this to me is that when the paused process is started again, it will have values still in memory from the previous time(s) it was running. If a software developer is not careful to reset the memory to its initial state when it was first created, it will act differently because it will start running with data already loaded.

Create. Kill. Die. Past life memory.

What I am saying is that even the crude multitasking software we use today has some similarities to the concept that we are part of a computer simulation. As already stated.... what will computers and software be capable of in 10,000 years... one computer then may very well be more powerful than all the computers combined that we have now.

Thread: Quantum Physics: can sealed indictments change?

Quantum tunneling is the thing you are interested in.

Hmm...not sure I would call it a "simulation".

I intuit that that term is a sign of the tempora et mores
as much as an effective metaphor.



As soon as there is something, discernible from nothing,
consciousness / function fallout from what I call the
exmordial potentiality field are inevitable. Or, rather,
can't have 1 without the other.

Everything in existence is consciousness.

Or so it seems to me.

;)

i think it means that we are here from the ride. but by observing the ride(lack of better word) we can change the ride

ether

I think I saw two strppers demonstrate it once.

research 'uncertainty principle' and 'observer effect'

Well, I once read a causal explanation.

If the experiment is performed with a single electron, then the result is predictable and particle-like.

If the experiment is performed with an electron ensemble, then the result is uncertain and wave-like.

In other words, waves are the collective mode behavior of particles ensembles due to interactions.

I'll but THAT for a dollar!

Regarding putting results in to a letter.

A camera OBSERVES the slits and particle. Printed result geta put into a letter.

At a future date, say after a election, if PartyA wins you open letter and SEE the result of particle going through a slit. THIS CAUSES the pattern that occured at the screen to change! Wave function collapses. However the pattern on the screen that corresponds to that letter happened DAYS OR WEEKS EARLIER. Meaning a message has been sent back in time. Can see who will win the election before the election occurs!

Similiarly, could do experiment 50 times, placing the results into letters labelled 1 to 50 (or whatever max numbers), after LOTTO is drawn, open the letters corresponding to the winning numbers, the winning openned numbers letters being SEEN cause there correaponding experimwnts to have wave function collapse and the experiments conducted DAYS EARLIER will have patterns produced that when observed tell the observer which numbers WILL BE the winning numbers.

Similiarly....Instead of uaing envelopes, could incode the data on a hars drive, then text or video could be taken at a future date and this data used to decide WHICH data to present in a pixel/video format, the data used to decide which SLIT RESULTS to allow to be presented as a blue pixel or red pixel and if not presented then as a black pixel, etc, THUS the user tells the computer some future data and this reaults in the computer choosing which experiments to show results where the results are presented in a graphical format that is meaningless to the user, but causea the information to travel back2 arda in time, causing the patterns to change, then the computer A FEW DAYS EARLIER interprets the patterns sequebces on the screen and presents this sequence to the user (locks in the loop) and decrypts this sequence into textual or video format. Result being that it is possible to send text/video into the past!
(Assuming it ia true that Observer effect depends on a human observering the result to have this effect).

Similarily,
Could write on envelopes
"Sell bitcoin at 20k"
"Sell bitcoin at 50k"
"Sell bitcoin at 200k"
"Sell bitcoin at 500k"
"Sell bitcoin at 5000k"

So can decide if should invest and for how long.

Or write dates for When WW3 starts.
Or write locations that are safe.

Once reaults are determined, the unopenned letters are burnt.

This.

Observing, consciousness focusing on all the possibilities, collapses them into a timeline.

Its a simulation, but its one of perception.


MIND OVER MATTER.

Though in our case, shared already collapsed and concrete in our perception.

One of the best videos that make concrete work out of what a simulation is like.

Note, all holograms have creators. And this doesnt prove One God, but does prove Higher Levels over our head, and so forth and so on basically because we're in infinity and the system is infinite progression, like metaphoric grades.


Perception - The reality beyond matter

Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 12/22/2017 11:19 PM

Because we observe the experiment we collapse the wave function of the the atoms. Our brains are designed to convert waves into matter.

When we turn our backs it is all like white noise ! When we look it becomes matter.

Only the front slit.

To a degree.

We live in a reality-matrix.

Consciousness came before matter, and matter is an emergent quality of consciousness. And not the other way around.
A causal context which solves any and all paradoxes in standard physics.

Read up on MD. Stuart Hameroff and Dr. Roger Penrose. And their Orch-OR theory. Lots of youtubes and books.

It is in these videos on yt OP. I could not stop watching them when I first saw them, really twisted my melon some of this but very interesting. It is in 5 parts so a long watch but I think you will enjoy them if you are in the zone. It might seem corny at first but trust me, stick with it and you will be like I really enjoyed them.

Here is the first part, the rest are easy to find then yes.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Merry Xmas and enjoy.

There are fundamentally two ways to understand perception of reality.
1. Matter creates consciousness
2. Consciousness creates matter.

The double slit implies consciousness creates matter.
It doesn't mean that we are in a simulation, although the holographic reality where all fractals are equal distance from the source of information best fits the findings for now.

If you check out the delayed double split you might jizz your pants. There is evidence of quantum erasure meaning that the written results will change if an observer views the data is possible.
Hard to believe but check out quantum eraser for another mindblowing job :)

Have you read Michael Talbot's book (The Holographic Universe) yet? If not, check it out...

:greenkarma:

I guess I have a different perspective when I read 'simulation'... For me, it's a simulation constructed by universal Consciousness (Conscious Energy) - not a simulation that is a byproduct of the 'advanced technology' which is rooted in and limited to this dense physical reality we currently experience... So I guess it would be appropriate to differentiate between a 'technological simulation' versus using 'simulation' as a metaphor for a temporary, ultra realistic experience which unfolds from a 'higher' or deeper level of reality/existence... Perhaps similar to what Bohm proposed with his 'implicate/enfolded order' conceptualization.

:mrbeanlike:

Is Schrödinger's cat dead or alive?

Thanks for the replies. Having a drink going down the hole