Oh Mr Darwin, how did 'evolution' NON-intelligently invent your nitric oxide blood pressure regulation technology?

I would rather you presented this in video than just say so.

In my observation everything gradually decays, not self assembles as if molecules have consciousness, intelligence, knowledge, and intention.

well for once I wiuld like to call you out about the mean engineering of human body.

there are several aspects of human body that not obly do prove humans are not a natural specie but who did fucked with our genetic is evil and have evil means towards his creation.

Just a bunch of interacting cells that happen to end up as a fully functioning human being. There's really nothing to it, right?

For science...

Yeah stuff just happens, for instance
"Within the bubble the ancestors of our dna found a home and the first cell arose."
See the first cell just arose because it's dna had ancestors, didja git it?


Last Edited by DGN on 01/07/2018 05:49 PM

I sometimes wonder what these geniuses would need to be able to agree on simple properties such as design, function, symmetry and plain old purpose.

Would not apply, they are content with technical explanations like developed, appeared, evolved, morphed, arose, came along.

D.N.A's "ancestors" were R.N.A. The first cells did not have D.N.A, and were pure R.N.A organisms. D.N.A was seemingly added in later down the line.

Added by who?

They aren't added. D.N.A is just a modified form of R.N.A, which is what was originally used by early organisms. Mutations on the R.N.A piled up and eventually one organism or another ended up with some weird mumbo-jumble mix of R.N.A and proto-D.N.A strands, and eventually that was streamlined into D.N.A. Had things been a bit different, we could have ended up with something entirely different than D.N.A.

Who wrote the mathematical/chemical codes in RNA?

There are no mathematical codes in D.N.A, not more than there are mathematical codes in photons hitting a wall. D.N.A is just the result of chemistry, which happens naturally all around us. It's just the same reason as other chemical reactions occur; laws of chemistry deem it so.

Hey DGN, why don't you tell us something that we all would like to know:

Why do you persist in promoting creationism when it's nothing more than bronze age myth?

For creationism to work, you need Mr. Jehovah to do the 'poofing' of stuff from 'nothing' to 'something.' However, if you can't come up with any scientific, rational, or logical explanation of WHAT this Mr. Jehovah is, or how this ethereal invisible being DOES something, you really can't launch an honest debate.

Why do you incessantly waste your time trying to defend allegories and nonsense written in that old rag?

The best I can figure is something can't come from nothing so we must be a figment of an imagination that doesn't exist.

Explain why "nothing" is the default start point. Explain what "nothing" means to you. Explain what "nothing" is, or at least try.

Depending on your ability to deal with the above challenges I've laid out for you, it will determine if you have the mental capacity to fathom the next step in your education.

The human body is amazing therefore Adam and Eve.

Speaking of Adam and Eve, genetic records show the human population never dwindled under like 70 members.

How could a proton appear?

He's back.

Actually they do appear and disappear from the zero point field continuously, it's explained by quantum physics. The phenomenon is well understood.

However, you still have not taken my above 3 challenges about "nothing."

You can not learn if you're afraid to answer questions. Start with the challenges I gave you, then maybe you will start to realize how simple minded the myths you believe really are.

I do understand that the Watchtower Society forbids you from trying to learn something other than their cut and dried myth based dogma, but that would make you a dupe. Do you want to be a dupe?

So how do protons form out of nothing, (not that I know)?

You're asking a question about "something" without first trying to explain what "nothing" means to you. If you do not have an understanding of what the concept of "nothing" is, it's completely unproductive to ask a question like that.

Try to answer the 3 challenges I gave you... if you can't explain those challenges, it's utterly useless for you to ask "how do protons form out of nothing."

I like your style but..... we're all wandering about in the same dimension.

Trying to be glib is not helping you here, do you want to actually learn something or not? Here, I'll give you the challenges again:

Explain why "nothing" is the default start point. Explain what "nothing" means to you. Explain what "nothing" is, or at least try.

Perhaps you think I'm setting some sort of trap for you or that I'm Satan trying to destroy your faith in Mr. Jehovah, which is always the 'fail safe' training in the JW religion.

You must recognize that any belief system that forbids you from challenging that belief system, is a belief system that can't stand up to scrutiny, examination, or fundamental challenge. Until you're ready to think for yourself, without collapsing in fear of some mythological god getting offended and punishing you for not blindly accepting dogma from a covey self anointed autocrats in Brooklyn, you're life is not your own, just put a gun in mouth.

The further back you go in the fossil record the simpler organisms get.

Right starting with diatoms in the oceans to make oxygen so bigger things could breath.

Oxygen already existed in the oceans....oxygen was first introduced by cyanobacteria (which caused the Great Oxygenation Event that killed off many non-oxygen synthesizing bacteria, the first extinction event so to say), and animals evolved from the branch of bacteria that could breath oxygen.