Professor Darwin's Church of 'Evolution': So what exactly is the faith in? Confirmation in total futility?

So far there have been no discoveries in the field of biology or physics which 100% require an intelligent designer of any sort.

Translation:
I haven't enough intelligence to recognize intelligent design even when it's presented, making me the highest intellect in the universe, everything is simple coincidence..


Last Edited by DGN on 01/22/2018 10:51 PM

Evolution is not fully random, only the mutations and their effects are. The selection process is anything but random. Bad, harmful traits are destined to be purged and not reproduce, and vice-versa for beneficial traits.

"The selection process" ???
Opsss.......
No intelligence allowed in NON-intelligent Un-design.

Non-random does not mean non-intelligent.

The four fundamental forces also do not require intelligence, as it seems they arose naturally after the initial aftermath of the Big Bang.

I mean non-random does not mean intelligent. Non got stuck in my head Imao.

Really, who programed the four forces the big bang translated into the formation of infinite spiral galaxies, or did they all form by lucky random unintentional coincidental cosmic coo coo-ness, like how a hand gernade constructs a house out of random debris?

Technically the Big Bang's aftermath phases caused the previous Unified Force to split into the 4 forces we know today, but we don't know anything about what happened BEFORE the Big Bang, so we can't say anything about what happened before it besides hypothetical ideas until we've found a way to figure out what happened before the Big Bang.

Except the thousands of direct copies we took from the cesspool created by 'nature' over 'millions and billions of years'.

And even when mimicking nature, with our superb intelligence, we still fail to make a simple copy and make something work in the physical world.

Oh now now, one musn't be heretical to the Sci-Fy Cult of Evolution, intelligence is not needed to make dirt clods come alive, lightening does it all the time. Just get a scoop of dirt, cut the ends of an extinction cord, stick 'em in the dirt and watch the cells form and come alive. It's science

Like I said lab experiments and math have already proven that organic molecules can react on their own

So?

Firstly, yes just regular mud will not create lif, and life was not creat d from the mud itself. Instead, the organic molecules in there are what chemically reacted together to create life. The Miller Uray Experiment already proved that under the conditions of early Earth organic molecules will create the building blocks of life on their own, and the experiment in particular not only created the 20 amino acids we see in life on earth today, but dozens more new ones. Other experiments, under both the same and different conditions, have created the building blocks of life.

So what does iron ore ever turn it's self into a hammer and nails?

Last Edited by DGN on 01/23/2018 05:10 PM

That won't happen because unlike organic compounds, iron, steel, and the like can not naturally interact and create complex strutures without outside interference in the same way that organically can.

Different elements, molecules, and compounds react differently in different conditions. Steel won't react in any way similar to organic molecules.

Unless it mixes with water and air and evolves upward into rust.

So your mind is the result of a mindless chemical reaction?

Why would we believe you?
Why would you believe your mind is right?

Actually AC040 made no claim amino acids produces intelligence, life, or anything at all, which is scientifically correct, they're just molecular combos of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.


Last Edited by DGN on 01/23/2018 09:37 PM

So much for the evolution of the Tin Man

Weak minds are easily controlled, resistance is futile;

Evolution has been observed on small and large scales, ands I about as proven as proven can be.

Like how the Apollo astronuts were observed walking on the moon?

Yeast becoming a new, multi cell organism and the observed speciation of fruit flies is more than enough proof of evolution.

Ok then stick with that. BTW which is your ancestor?

Last Edited by DGN on 01/30/2018 02:20 PM

Neither. Neither of them are on the huma evolutionary tree.

Neither what?