|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Government Planning Biological Attack on US
|
|
Poster Handle
|
MissCleo |
|
Post Content
|
Biological weapons are extremely hard to make and expensive. NTAs on the other hand are easy to make and last a long long time. If a terrorist is planning on exterminating a lot of people they would use an NTA, not a biological weapon.
Resume: 23 years countering WMDs
Quoting: Sand_Spider_Within the Paddock deal in Las Vegas was with al Waleed, 500 billion personal fortune, MGM owner, he's got the motive and the money. and this bug just happened to hit the day he was taken from custody in the Ritz to real jail. and he refused to pay the reduced 5 billion in penalties. Do you realize the amount of money and time it would take to make a bio WMD even relevant? There are far scarier things out there that would make your hairs stand up...trust me,,. true, things more deadly and quick. if genocide is the goal. I believe there is an effort to discredit the CDC, and strain the US medical facilities. at a time when Puerto Rico pharmaceuticals were down. dry run, running out of Tamiflu, warning of bigger things to come?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
