Want to see the result of viruses causing cell mutation, as in Ebola, Sci-fy Cult of evolution?

I tried to figure that out but I couldn't think of anything so.... what's your point?

Organisms are just complex chemical reactions on an enormous scale.

Exactly what prevents chemical reactions from creating an organism? We already have very very complex, life-like chemical reactions (Viruses and Viroids), what makes life different?

Lack of intelligent cause and correct effect. Every complex mechanism has an intelligent designer or there wouldn't even be atoms to start with.

Last Edited by DGN on 02/17/2018 04:30 PM

Freaking coward, avoiding being put against the wall!

Now now one mustn't get all poopy pants, remember evolution inspires intelligence and courage.

Answer then and you'll be better quoted:
What is DNA?
Are you willing to learn about evolution?

No dodging, no hem and haw, plain simple write down the answers

So show me a human with a tail.

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

^ A report of 6 different cases of people born with tails.

I saw a girl born with two heads which proves evolution.

You asked for a person born with a tail, I gave you a person born with a tail. Stop deflecting and explain why a tail gene exists in humans.

Who cares? Good pics though, but really what's your point?

Last Edited by DGN on 02/17/2018 11:09 PM

wow... it's like pulling teeth. If human DNA was created from scratch by an all knowing, all powerful intelligence, why do we have deactivated tail genes? The same genes that are present in mice and monkeys.

The same can be asked of the teeth/snout genes in chickens.

So what?

It's really easy why. If you were able to create Life, would you create strands of DNA for each living specimen or would you create one DNA strand that you can just alter minorly to create different animals.

I would create one DNA strand that alters itself automatically through evolution.

You mean through mutational cell replication failures producing deformed dysfunctional blobs?

Or.....you could create D.N.A that, when replicated, it has the possibility to create new, beneficial mutations, like what we saw in the CCr 32 delta mutation in humans, or the mutation that allowed an group of bacteria to consume nylon.

Or one can play once upon a time mind games with their own self the whole life like a dog chasing it's own tail, ending up right where it started.

Or if you were God you could just get it right, from the start, like he did, can you?

But bacteria couldn't digest nylon from the start. Nylon didn't exist from the start. The ability to digest nylon is the result of a change (mutation) which is beneficial.

Making stuff up as you go? Since you know the history of bacteria tell me how many varieties are there.

Last Edited by DGN on 02/19/2018 10:42 AM

What about answering my questions then?
What is DNA?
Are you willing to learn about evolution?

Maybe later I'm busy studying baboons and bananas, how they hide in the bushes wait for a native to happen by, slip one under his foot, make him fall down go boom.

Last Edited by DGN on 02/19/2018 02:55 PM

Surprising.

Bacteria has an immense variety because it's an entire domain of organisms. Every single organism can be placed in one of three domains;
Archaebacteria: the rarer, extremophile single cell organisms.

Bacteria: Most single cell organisms on Earth, arguably the most numerous group on Earth.

Eukaryota: Most organisms you see every day, Plants, Animals, Fungi, single-cell organisms with nuclei and complex organelles, etc.

I made it up? Nylonase is a man-made compound. Nylon-consuming bacteria would have to have appeared after humans.

"There is scientific consensus that the capacity to synthesize nylonase most probably developed as a single-step mutation that survived because it improved the fitness of the bacteria possessing the mutation. More importantly: The enzyme involved has been produced by a mutation completely randomizing the original gene. Despite this, the new gene still had a novel, albeit weak, catalytic capacity. This is seen as a good example of how mutations easily can provide the raw material for evolution by natural selection"

"
"There is scientific consensus.... most probably....a good example of how mutations easily can provide the raw material for evolution by natural selection"

I sure do like the slick talking speculation/fabrication smoke screen proving evolution by confusing the fact the bacteria were already there millions of years, only nylon is new.

Last Edited by DGN on 02/19/2018 04:22 PM

It's a new form of bacteria, they had to evolve an enzyme (nylonase) to consume nylon. Trying to make an excuse doesn't change the fact not only did they have to evolve a new enzyme, but the fact that not only was it observed in the wild for the first time, but it was replicated in a lab by placing a different strain of bacteria in an environment with nylon to see if they would evolve nylonase to digest it. And they did.

Yup, get used to it. Christians are intellectually dishonest, cherry pickers and cowards. No matter what you say, they will twist and bend until it fits their twisted faith. When confronted, dodge, dodge again and make stupid baseless claims and foundation-less arguments. This happens because they're dead inside, trembling of fear of a malicious indoctrination. They live sad, guilty and miserably, thinking to be right from the top of their purposely limited knowledge. For knowledge is the only thing that can break the shackles they live upon. But these shackles are the base of their pathetic existence and if broken, their whole world will erode beneath them.