Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,041 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 987,223
Pageviews Today: 1,763,749Threads Today: 754Posts Today: 13,447
07:59 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject SPACEX FRAUD and COLLUSION WITH YOUTUBE/GOOGLE Since they allowed IT
Poster Handle The Deplorable Astromut
Post Content
...

It's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of fact, and it is a verifiable fact that the launch was real and the second stage was ejected from earth orbit.
...

It doesn't matter to me because I didn't start with the assumption that I should trust or rely on the SpaceX webcast as the ultimate evidence of their launches in the first place. I short circuit that entire argument by filming it myself, both during the launch and after. Fun fact, I tracked the entire flight of the booster that they didn't initially show, so if they were doing it to hide something I would have captured it. Like I captured the bird that probably went splat against the booster they weren't initially showing (not that they could have anticipated that). If anything I welcome YouTube letting them edit their webcast to correct the video (albeit poorly, you can totally see it pasted over the original when they first start showing it). It means people will be forced to realize there's more evidence for it totally independent of SpaceX and maybe wake them up to independent observation. Maybe, just maybe, some will even be inspired to do what I do and track it themselves.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


But why is SpaceX allowed to do things to a live stream on Youtube that no one else is allowed to do?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75901873


I don't care. I'm not relying on the SpaceX footage at all. They could come right out on their webcast and claim that the launch was faked and it wouldn't change the fact that it is real and that I have seen it and tracked it myself both during the launch and after the launch in space. What they say and do during that webcast has no bearing on my independent observations.
 Quoting: The Deplorable Astromut


Can you just answer the question? This isn't about you, or your footage, your independent observations, or your tracking software. I know it's hard to comprehend, but this isn't about you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75901873

"SPACEX FRAUD and COLLUSION WITH YOUTUBE/GOOGLE Since they allowed IT"
If it's fraud there would have to be some substance to the fraud, so yes, my footage comes into play whether you like it or not. Especially since my footage covers the entire flight of the booster that they initially did not show (that just boils you up, doesn't it), so if there was any fraud to be had there it must necessarily show up in my footage as well, whatever it is.

I answered the question, the answer is I don't care. I mean it, I don't care if they're allowed to reinsert footage into their livestream recording and I'm not. I'd personally rather NOT be able to do that, to avoid claims that I am doing it to hide shit, but if SpaceX wants to do that and YouTube lets them, I don't care. That's exactly why I go to such lengths to provide independent verification completely separate from SpaceX.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP