Americans, serious question.. gun ban....

Nice read brah! nice read!

sorry chap your flying off the handle here now, im not rooting for no war no fight no harm, nor do i want to cause anyone any harm.
so i will sip my earl tea peacefully, jus like i intended this thread to stay, peacefully.

I'm not worried, that confused old man would get lost trying to find my house.

I'll just go out to the main road and flip the sign pointing to my town in the other direction like they do in cartoons.

Let’s just pray this does NOT happen. It would be ugly.

agreed

thread ended here.

Somethings need to be sorted out ugly.

I can say with utmost certainty that the inland NW of the USA is not only pro 2nd amendment we are 110% 2nd amendment and then some. I live in the state shaped like a gun, anti gun folks here best keep to Boise.

US Baby Boomers retired on profits from deep state's Defense industry stocks and slaughter of women and children.To all Americans....

At first many people would comply because they don't want to risk dying or going to jail. But there would be protests and civil disobedience all over the country. You would see multiple events similar to the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff but instead of ending peacefully they would end in shootouts.

Casualties would mount on both sides, people who were formerly on the fence would join anti-government forces after seeing abuse and family members killed. Eventually either the government would call off the gun confiscation or a full civil war would erupt. Half the military would defect. Foreign countries would love to get involved to screw over the U.S. For example I can imagine Russia sending over "advisers" to train Americans and give them heavy weaponry.

sadly i'd be put in a position to shoot any redcoat dumb enough to come to take them.

but that's not how they'll do it.

they will ban new owners first. let the old ones die out.

keep brainwashing "guns are evil, government good" into the new kids in the public brainwashing stations (aka schools)

then they will do enough paid voluntary turn-ins to reduce the "enemy's" weapons to a low enough number to view us as a non-threat and then begin passing all the insane new world order laws they want.

that being said.

IF the "assault weapons ban 2018" does pass and the patriots don't march on washington...we don't deserve the weapons anyways..

All force is local. Remember that. Physical control requires a presence. It can't be remote and effective.

Someone drives the drone. Someone writes its code. A power station recharges the batteries. The station is run by people. All of those people are local somewhere too.

I think it's more like 3/4ths of the states have to pass it in both state houses and the governor has to sign.

gun conf = revolution.

During Obama's reign, there was an arms race between the federal government and the People.

The People won!

Note that Obama and the dims controlled both houses of Congress, they could have easily passed anti-Second Amendment laws. They did not because they knew they would lose elections.

Brits do not understand Americans and vice versa.

The problem there is they just have to push a button, police forces have bear cats and other armored vehicles... I took an otath once for the military and twice for government jobs. That oath is to degenerate the constitution against all enemies foreign n domestic... Nuff said

Welp, like Ted Kennedy used to say "We'll drive off that bridge when we come to it."

One thing I can assure you of... it's not going to be pretty.

The bill would be illegal. No amendment can be usurped by deranged politicians. Relax and watch it's going to get better.

I’m a retired LEO, with 13 years on my Dept’s SRT, from a pretty liberal Northeast City, and I don’t know one single officer in my Dept who believes that only LEOs should be armed.

There might have been a couple who wanted strict restrictions on MSRs, but they kept it to themselves. The vast majority believed strongly in the full protection of the 2A.

Not one guy on my former SRT would have participated in confiscation of weapons from the general public.

All that said, if a weapons ban ever did pass, and any agents or officers came to my door to take them, they are not getting them. My level of resistance would depend on how hard they insisted on coming in.

Last Edited by mport81 on 03/09/2018 08:22 PM

That should be defend, tnot degenerate. damn spell check

Crispus attucks....

This is true, although it was the police not the military. And it was under disaster conditions where there were some mighty fucked up people running riot.

It would last a whole ten minutes.

Won't happen considering that the majority of cops and the military support the 2nd amendment.

What I could see happening is that during a collapse the FEDs under a Hillary Clinton / Obama character try and force gun control then use Chinese or UN troops to enforce it.

You're thinking about 2018 technology, or maybe 2025 technology.

In 2040, there will be shit you couldn't have even imagined was possible right now, just like there's shit now you couldn't have imagined in 1995.

By that point, drones will have an endurance of days or weeks... and be able to make decisions on their own faster than a human could.

AI will be driving the drone and writing it's code, robots will be running the power station, and all of them will be armed to the teeth and worst case easily replaceable without the need for years of training.

Every army marches on its belly.

Cut off the supply chain, and you kill the army.

This is worth clicking on. perfect for the thread.

(Snip)
Boston – National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons were ambushed by elements of a Para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw...


[link to www.ilgunrights.com]

I always comply with all lawful orders. Any law or order that conflicts with the Constitution is unlawful. You figure it out, limey bastard.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
? Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956