LMAO! Sometimes I forgot that I am all over the place with info. The situation I proposed makes more sense if you read the linked conservativetreehouse article. I’ll try again...

So Trump brought attention - via tweet - to the FISA memo redactions and the Strzok-Page text redactions (not the term “OCONUS Lures,” specifically, but the general subject of redactions, specifically), but I am wondering if he brought attention to the Strzok-Page texts/FISA memo redactions specifically for us to notice the differences. Like those “Spot the Differences” pictures for kids where there are slight differences in two pictures. So Q had already told us a lot of info that made those memos and texts not too surprising. Except for the “OCONUS Lures” redaction (not the only exception but a notable one). And he keeps asking us how to catch a fish, so I am wondering if we are supposed to be looking at who the OCONUS Lure was.

Extrapolating from that logic, I am wondering if POTUS’ tweets - the ones with misspellings and whatnot - are not about the actual missing letters or whatever but actually about whatever subject he is tweeting - like “Spot the Difference” kid’s worksheets but the misspelled and grammatically-incorrect tweet version. And instead of simply “Spot the Difference,” those tweets are an actual marker to look deeper into the subject matter of those tweets (Not just the obvious differences, themselves), just as he brought attention to “OCONUS Lures” by simply tweeting something vague about redactions and whatnot. Is this making sense? He never specifically emphasizes “OCONUS Lures” but, rather, alludes to that being the redaction we should be looking at.

HMM, you were picking up what I was putting down, above. Ignore the mistakes in the tweets and, instead, think of those tweets (the ones with mistakes and later corrections, where POTUS “Spots the Difference” in his corrected tweet) as notifications of (whatever subject those particular tweets focus on) digging prompts. And what do you mean “8 dives?” Bitch, I am on dive 8 million!!!! But, no, I never noticed any info or patterns in those tweet misspellings/missing letters/etc, but who knows? I am going to explore the theory that those tweets are markers and start Dig #8,000,001 into their subject matter and dates and then cross-reference with happenings in the news and/or declassifications. Wish me luck! I’ll be up for air in a day or so...hopefully, with a fish! #gonenoodling #spybaitingwithlures