Who removed audio from the Sandy Hook 911 Calls--CSP or Danbury State's Atty?

Memories.....

Thread: Sandy Hook Rick Thorne / Nute 1st recording

Old news, D - who did it?

One north hall teacher's call is broken into roughly 50 separate pieces. That's 50 felonies for one call, lol.

Time stamps had to be hand-manufactured for the fake "individual" 911 calls.

You said the identity of who did this was important--so who is it, Sedensky or CSP?

And don't forget that the same exact thing was done to the Newtown "landline" calls - instead of fake-o-matic timestamps, however, they just labeled calls "Call 1, "Call 2" etc. (Call 2 of course was just a lower-volume version of Call 1).

Sure suggests collusion to me.

Oh--and 25 of those pieces are missing.

A handy combo of felony evidence tampering and felony evidence destruction; if the culprit doesn't want to be guilty of felony destruction, s/he will have to produce the missing audio.

I distinctly remember you arguing about mic clipping or gates on cell phones..you sure were in the weeds back then. I suppose you decided that edits were made since it now fits your narrative.

Since you now are on the recording edit page...well I have a question for for you...

Why would they insert a ground buzz on the recordings?

Nay nay, my friend :)

WHO removed the audio and created fake timestamps?

Simple question.

Dudeashaneo won't answer :)

So what, you won't answer why Chapman doesn't have blood on his uniform! you schmuck......LOLOL!

No doubt there's a thread for that.

This one is about identifying felons.

Someone sat at a computer, put a single 911 call into SoundForge or equivalent, removed little chunks (and bigger ones), then re-saved the remnant chunks as "individual" calls. The minute those files were saved, the editor became a felon.

Now...do state police offices have audio editors who routinely work with 911 calls after the fact? The standard protocol, nationwide, is that 911 calls are automatically logged and saved; most never have to be reviewed again.

Hell, the CSP filename even includes the word "logger."

Considering that the Newtown (non-CSP) calls were also falsely name, that does suggest some overarching hand. Sedensky in collusion with Zezula et al.

Whoever did it or oversaw it--is a felon.

"Felon"?!?!

Are you really that gullible???? NO, you're not....

You know as well as I and the rest of us, that under the premise of "national security" you are held harmless from the LIES that you propagate on its behalf. Take your bullshit and go somewhere else. Your diatribe is old and crusty and has no merit. Your fairytale stories of Barney Fife have no rhyme or reason!

Also, once again, where is the blood on Chapman's uniform????

....I didn't think so! LOL!!!

Woah I guess I must weigh in.

The point is we all now agree the "calls" are edited recordings.

Since it is my contention that the event was a drill embellished with an Urban Legend it stands to reason that the " calls" are from obvious action but edited for different reasons.

The audio was not edited professionally so I can't imagine it was anyone other than government officials.

Now that we know the "calls" as presented to the public have been augmented in some fashion...it would be safe to say the entire event has been augmented to push a narrative.

Urban Legend.

It was your comment, Dude.

You said that the identity of the person(s) removing the audio was "actually very important."

So who was it?

I'm going to say Sedensky did it--though, because I now know Dudeashaneo is working for Newtown, and trying to implicate CSP in wrongdoing, I reserve some possibility of CSP doing it.

However, audio was deleted from BOTH NPD and CSP 911 calls, indicating someone other than CSP.

Given Sedensky's frantic, failed effort to keep 911s secret, I think he's still the leading candidate.

Either way, Danbury State's Atty Stephen Sedensky lied to a judge.

00139508

Alison Peters says Thorne's call is 00:14:43 (14 min 43 sec) in length.

you're a whack job! still paranoid because dudeshaneo got you all tangled up with your nonsense of not understanding the "spliced edited" calls, and you can't seem to get past it still!?!! Ha!hahaha

MORE EVIDENCE...

Who took a 14 min 911 recording and turned it into 3 separate pieces?

That's three separate felonies right there.

Now we have Peters supporting Ginsberg--both agree that the original was a contiguous, single file.

I am just happy everyone agrees the call recordings are edited. I got tired of Zeph telling me it was that cell phone microphone gates and clicking was from compression...geez how sophmoric it was. I pointed out exactly where the edits were and what was used to mask blends....but noooooo it was normal cell and background noise. Could never tell me why I could hear all the background noise in the 911 center...but not Bob nute paging cops in the field during Thorne's "call". Listen for the " calling all cars" page that tramples conversation for amature edit blend attempt. But I suppose you had to keep the drill calls in tact and work with what you had.

The dirty little secret is most of the drill participants had no idea they were in on the Urban Legend....that is another thread.....

Now suddenly calls are missing information! No shit Sherlock....and about time you pulled your head out of your ass and realized I was right the entire time.
There I said it

Who removed the audio?

It's actually very important.

Not for the least of which reasons that it's a felony.

In fact, EACH instance of audio removal is a felony.

Operation Juice Box is over; rest assured that the FBI boys are patient.

And don't forget:

Thread: Who faked the individual time stamps on the artificially-segmented Sandy Hook 911 calls?

you are so stubborn and takes you so long to pick up what's being put down! LOLOLOL!!!

there is no "felony". everyone involved has signed off on a hold harmless disclosure. why so difficult for you to understand!!???? mom's apple pie red white and blue, is this you????? well that's not how the real world works. everyone is corrupt involved in this staged event and has covered their ass........

look, if a company like sysco can go along with some scam called sandy hook and use both addresses "willingly" - what does that tell you?!

It took you long enough to confirm that the audio script was "edited" now just wrap your head around the FACT - it was a SCRIPT!!! lol!

It is not felony if it is a drill and a produced event. If it was never real you cannot apply law to it. Hence why the entire thing was regurtitated to the masses in a report made up entirely of witness statememts and news stories...or as the LAW would call it...hearsay.

Thank you for keeping the pressure on and proving my point over and over again. Every piece of evidence I provided showing the Urban Legend at face value Zeph would discount or have some "official" excuse to argue against it...only to end up admitting in a later 3 post screed what she had found....ahem your welcome....

Last Edited by Dudeashaneo on 06/26/2018 10:42 AM

State of Connecticut

General Assembly

File No. 578
January Session, 2005

Substitute House Bill No. 6746

House of Representatives, April 28, 2005

The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP. LAWLOR of the 99th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.

AN ACT CONCERNING EVIDENCE TAMPERING, PERJURY AND FALSE STATEMENTS BY POLICE OFFICERS.

[Shoutcaps in original]

[link to www.cga.ct.gov (secure)]

"Tampering With or Fabricating Evidence

A person commits this crime if he (1) believes that an official proceeding is pending or will be instituted and (2) alters, destroys, conceals, or removes a record, document, or thing to impair its validity or availability in the proceeding. This is a class D felony."

It is literally possible to predict pending action in the lawsuits by the number of fauxsts here. Must be new document coming down the pipeline soon.

How bizarre that the American legal system literally uses GLP as PR outreach. But...nothing like cheap crowdsourcing I guess.

THERE'S A RUMOR THAT IT'S FAKE...


SUSAN,...I NEED U TO GET OFF OF THIS LINE...!

Among the candidates:

Detective A. Peters (CSP)
L. Lopes-Phelan (DESPP) (Refused Peters' request for acoustic analysis)

Paul Ginsberg himself (private audio expert)

Paul is an interesting candidate; we know that he already revised his gunshot count (just before the report was finalized, imagine that).

We also know he signed a non-disclosure agreement (this per a journalist I spoke with). I think everyone signed an NDA, pretty much, anyway, so Paul's isn't necessarily related to chopping out audio.

There is one communication from Alison Peters asking him to get rid of all noise except gunshots on one of the calls. I used to be suspicious of Peters but now I'm not sure.

I think a quiet, Sedensky+choppers is more likely.

Who are the choppers? Probably couldn't ask them to sign an NDA, since it would prove they chopped.

At any rate--it wasn't NPD.