Sex-Bot Question (philisophical, satire?)

If VJJ-2000 were programmed to say "FUCK ME. FUCK ME. I WANT YOU. I WANT YOU." at the slightest touch, would John (the thief) be perfectly within his rights by removing "her" from my home? He's giving "her" what she "wants" after all. He's fulfilling "her" request. Hell, maybe he's even liberating "her".

If the AI program is licensed to me, then don't I have complete ownership of VJJ-2000's "decisions"? If "she" "consented" to being fucked by John, then haven't I consented?

If VJJ-2000 is simply a piece of property (like a lawn mower), then why are child sex robots so offensive to normal people? Is it because intentions matter? If so, then don't my intentions (as VJJ-2000's owner) and John's intentions (as the the thief--at best--and rapist--at worst) matter???

I don't know about you but anyone wanting to fuck a child substitute needs to beaten to a 50% chance of survival.

The simple fact that no one has replied to this thread (despite many views) is anecdotal evidence (at least) that this subject is difficult to deal with.

Sure...I could be asking these questions about a pocket pussy or a dildo. But I'm not. I'm asking them about a product with "artificial intelligence".

Keyword: INTELLIGENCE.

Sentience?

Maybe.

We can't even decide on a definition of sentience.

If we could, then the abortion debate would be settled.

And vegans would either be the norm or they would shut the fuck up.

Now you see?

Last Edited by Literally Hitler on 05/04/2018 09:23 PM

I'm with you.

It sounds to me like you think intentions matter.

If a person had a rolled-up bundle of newspapers that they imagined was a child, and they fucked it like there's no tomorrow, would you feel the same?

Last Edited by Literally Hitler on 05/04/2018 09:24 PM

Yeah I think intent matters, no shit.
And word games pretending there 'could' be a legitimate interest in sexually exploring a child of any age is perverse.
I like sex, a lot, but never ever considered the notion of involving a child in any way.
You seem to be interested in finding a loophole, pun intended, where some type of pedophilia imagination could be seen as legitimate.

As a parent, I would have no qualms in making sure anyone making the attempt on anything of mine to make sure it to be the most prolonged and intense pain in whatever few remaining hours or days of the rest of that perverse persons life.

Man, you've got me all wrong. Im not looking for a loophole or anything even like that. Im not into the kiddie shit. And I'm with you--pedos need a punishment that they wont soon forget. I get it.

What I'm into is the concept of SENTIENCE and exactly what it is. My inspiration is abortion (which, in my mind, is MURDER).

The point of this thread is that, while people are debating the "rights" of AI constructs like sex robots, tens of millions of human babies are getting dismembered in the womb, suffering indiscribable pain and dying a death we wouldn't even wish on pedophiles.

Torn limb from limb and having their brains sucked out with a tube.

That shit is sick.

Maybe I'm not the best at making a point. I can concede that. But I'm NOT making excuses for pedos. I don't go for that shit.

The "rights" of electronic/mechanical/AI devices are being debated RIGHT NOW.

There are international councils debating the matter.

Meanwhile, actual humans are being torn up and sold for their parts. Yes, PEOPLE. Human beings!

Why?

Well, mainly for "convenience". Yep. Just like buying a gallon of milk from 711. Walk in and pay. If you aren't willing to pay, then I'm sure that the American taxpayers will cover it.

Well, I'm not willing to pay for murder. I'm not willing to pay for a baby to be painfully dismembered and killed. I'm not willing to face G-d and say "Yes, I helped that happen".

Not me. Not this guy.

I didn't reply to your question of moral philosophy because I was asleep! That now behind us, patience is a virtue.

As to rape, your VJJ-2000 has no sentience, therefore a crime cannot be committed against it, but it can be part of a criminal act: the defiling of your property--the VJJ itself. A difference exists between the two.

Likewise you cannot rape your VJJ, rather only employ it as a masturbatory aid. It can neither grant nor revoke permission--no unfortunate slight can exist.

Personally I can't believe I involved myself in this discussion, but as I have just awakened, I'm lacking the restraint to not reply.

So there you have it, no sentience, no rape [on two counts] and hopefully you have your answer and I'll not have nightmares of a stolen VJJ-2000 to disrupt my sleep tonight!



Last Edited by Louis in Richmond on 05/04/2018 11:43 PM

Define "sentience" and you might have a point.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it thusly:

responsive to or conscious of sense impressions

"responsive to"...

Hmmm. An AI robot would qualify.

"conscious of"...

Now that is a different story...

Now we are tasked with defining "consciousness".

However, since the word "or" is used in the definition, we can conclude that all which is needed for "sentience" is to be "responsive to sense impressions" (per the definition above) and so AI would certainly be considered sentient.

I wonder what else might be sentient per this definition.

Plants? YES.

Amoebas? YES.

Calculators? YES, actually. They certainly respond to sensory input.

^^^
The most important and pressing issue of all time and yet GLP sheeps--I mean "sleeps".

Enjoy your slumber, dumbfucks.

^^^^^^^^^

This guy thought he had the answer. So simple right?

I've shown that he has answers that even a retard wouldn't claim. No offense to him. I would have given the same shit-tarded self-assured answer that he did back when I was 18 years old or so. Good on him. He's as smart as someone who hasnt thought about anything at any time. DURRRRRRRR...

Who can correct him in a more thorough way than Merriam-Webster and I have? That's the question.

What? You think that this "know-it-all" KNOW-NOTHING is a rarity???

Oh no.

People like the Ted-Danson-Douche abound. They are everywhere--people who are ignorant of their ignorance.

Address the issue--SENTIENCE AND IF IT MATTERS. Right now, it's the only issue that matters. It's the universal question.

^^^^^^^^^

I'm being pretty hard on this guy and I apologize.

I've been where he is now. Maybe I'm just being hard on my past self and feeling retrospectively retarded.

I'm sorry to take it out on you, Ted-Danson-Douche. MY BAD!

I've just had that same self-assured false-truth experience (and I decided to tell the world) and been proven to be a window-licking dimwit like you have.

It sucks. But that's life and we have to learn in some way or another. The good news is that you're smarter now! You owe me $5000.00

Your' nuts. A child "sex robot" is simply an animated doll. You can buy dolls of children in walmart. The sex robot is not a child and barely looks like one. I really don't give a shit if every pervert buys one and fucks her daily. It's much better than abducting kids, fucking them and killing them because they can identify him(or her). Get real and leave the perverts alone unless you want to force them into doing really bad things.

I have no interest in any sex doll/robot unless it's hot, functional, loving, and at least looks like an 18+ year old. I'd prefer a real girl, but they are so hard to get I'm almost at the point of getting a real doll.

Why does a sex robot need AI? I don't want to talk to her, I want to hug her, have her hug me, stick my dick inside her and have her anatomically correct orifices emulate what a hot girl would do with her internal musculature. I want her warm, acting loving, and possibly to purr like a cat. Nothing more. Just hug me and sleep with me inside her all night long.

If they stole from you, you have been raped.

Answer to original post, without going into the foundational assertions is, no, no and no.

That's a good point. No damage to people, no crime.

That's a libertarian perspective that I can appreciate.

However, I wonder if you would approve of a "SCHOOL SHOOTER KIT" sold on Amazon consisting of a plate carrier with mil-spec plates, a kevlar helmet, a face mask, a Tavor rifle, 10 NATO-spec magazines and 300 rounds of ammo.

All of the above things are things that I own, by the way. I have nothing against The implements listed above.

BUT DOESN'T INTENT MATTER?

Hell, I'm a gun-nut. My intent is to show off, protect myself and my property, take tactical training courses and to pretend I'm a tough guy (although I'm NOT a veteran and am not even in the same fucking realm as the badass veterans who risk their lives on a daily basis).

But I'd never be a school shooter or even consider buying a package of products marketed towards potential school shooters. That shit is fucked up in my humble opinion.

Do you think marketing a "SCHOOL SHOOTER KIT" is acceptable?

Well shit. Ive been raped a couple times then. Man, I feel so dirty.

This is a subject wherein expounding on foundational assertions and arguments against them is necessary.

An AI responds to sensory input. You squeeze the nips and the bot says "oh baby". You squeeze them harder and the robot says "Ouch!"

You know what else does that? A human. Maybe even you.

Merriam-Webster defines SENTIENCE as:

"responsive to or conscious of sense impressions"

That certainly describes any sex-bot that gives conditional responses based on input.

It also describes almost all of our "smart" gadgets that we use every day. Frankly, it also describes things like calculators, grass, dogs and even rocks.

What a pickle.

Oh yeah--pickles would also be considered sentient under the standard definition. After all, they certainly are "responsive to sense impressions". Put one on a red-hot stove burner if you don't believe me. You'll see a "response", I can assure you.

Damn. Not even the international crowd can approach these questions. What a bunch of homos.

Well fuck it all. I'm pinning this shit.

Women use Dildos without consent since basically the stone age.

Ask them.

Else, only feminists think that things or machines can be raped.

Thank god, the muslim invaders will at least end that insanity within the next decades with their Sharia.

And Muslims have been raping goats for three hundred years. What's your point?

As to your comment that "only feminists think that things and machines can be raped", then WHAT--SPECIFICALLY--differentiates between "things and machines" and humans? What makes a human "rapable" and a machine "unrapable"?

No, rape is something you do to a living thing.

So--if my hand is tired and sore from working all day, I'm raping it when I jack off? After all, my hand is worn out and just doesnt want to comply. But I force it to. Am I a rapist?!

Of course it's not rape, it's just a machine.

I think people are exaggerating these sex bots. They are not going to replace humans or women. Again, it's just a machine. Glorified blow up sex doll.