Hell Yeah! Senate votes to reverse FCC order and restore net neutrality | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74632481 United States 05/17/2018 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76118798 United States 05/17/2018 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76584533 Slovakia 05/17/2018 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72322921 United States 05/17/2018 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
yermama User ID: 76030728 United States 05/17/2018 01:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pro net neuter tards... ...Why do you want more Gov up in your shit? You want more of this type of crap in your life? [link to www.sandiegouniontribune.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76384961 United States 05/17/2018 01:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this is bad as is not net neutrality it is some rubbish obama passed in 2015 and called it net neutrality to fool people which benefits big tech companies Quoting: Spoon Boy what the FCC did was remove obama rubbish called net neutrality and tried to put everything back to how it was pre 2015 this This |
yermama User ID: 76030728 United States 05/17/2018 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 75190797 United States 05/17/2018 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Net Neutrality" should be called "Net Neuter". It's the death of internet freedom as we knew it when Obama mandated this oppression. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76118798 I agree and have said the same thing. from 02/26/2015.. Thread: STOP using the brainwashing words "Net Neutrality"!!! This is about INTERNET and FREE SPEECH CONTROL and DESTRUCTION! Quoting: Anonymous Cowherder Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
AndIWillAlwaysLoveYou User ID: 76340375 United States 05/17/2018 01:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
yermama User ID: 76030728 United States 05/17/2018 01:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Liberals are clever. They picked "Democrat" as their party label. A positive connotation there. Who can argue with "democracy", right? It goes on and on. "Planned Parenthood", "Dreamers", 15 bucks an hour (but no more), etc, etc. Now a "Neutral" net. Stop falling for their bullshit. However, the Senate is also full of traitor republicans. They can all KMA. Trump needs to piss all over this this in a Moscow hotel room for all I care. |
AndIWillAlwaysLoveYou User ID: 76340375 United States 05/17/2018 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Liberals are clever. They picked "Democrat" as their party label. A positive connotation there. Who can argue with "democracy", right? Quoting: yermama 76030728 It goes on and on. "Planned Parenthood", "Dreamers", 15 bucks an hour (but no more), etc, etc. Now a "Neutral" net. Stop falling for their bullshit. However, the Senate is also full of traitor republicans. They can all KMA. Trump needs to piss all over this this in a Moscow hotel room for all I care. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35799703 United States 05/17/2018 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
yermama User ID: 76030728 United States 05/17/2018 02:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73555448 United States 05/17/2018 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Senate today voted 52-47 to disapprove the FCC’s recent order replacing 2015’s net neutrality rules, a pleasant surprise for internet advocates and consumers throughout the country. Although the disapproval will almost certainly not lead to the new rules being undone, it is a powerful statement of solidarity with a constituency activated against this deeply unpopular order. Quoting: 5.0% [link to techcrunch.com (secure)] |
Reggie Bannister User ID: 72788982 United States 05/17/2018 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Senate today voted 52-47 to disapprove the FCC’s recent order replacing 2015’s net neutrality rules, a pleasant surprise for internet advocates and consumers throughout the country. Although the disapproval will almost certainly not lead to the new rules being undone, it is a powerful statement of solidarity with a constituency activated against this deeply unpopular order. Quoting: 5.0% [link to techcrunch.com (secure)] Deeply unpopular is a kind way of stating the situation. I'm glad they did this. . |
Shamrock007 User ID: 75621674 United States 05/17/2018 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Imagine for a moment that an "emergency" was declared. Martial law declared. Then you were scooped up and put into fema camps. MSM is already taken over by globalists. They aren't reporting it.. Newspapers, them too. Cell phones? No luck there. The one chance anyone has is if they got snatched up under those circumstances... Social media. Nope... Labeled as a Utility. Taken over.... [link to www.washingtonexaminer.com (secure)] Liberal philanthropist George Soros and the Ford Foundation have lavished groups supporting the administration’s “net neutrality” agenda, donating $196 million and landing proponents on the White House staff, according to a new report. And now, as the Federal Communications Commission nears approving a type of government control over the Internet, the groups are poised to declare victory in the years-long fight, according to the report from MRC Business, an arm of the conservative media watchdog, the Media Research Center. This was during the Muslim Cuck's administration. Trump did everything he could to stop it. Short of not being able to control congress and how bought off globalist supporters vote. Now... Lets hear all about how any conservatives on GLP are all cheering about Net Nuetraility when Soros just won a victory he paid over 200 million for. Yaaaaay!!!!!!! Last Edited by Shamrock007 on 05/17/2018 02:10 AM |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 05/17/2018 02:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because in 2000, 4 corporations didn't control 70% of American access to the 'net. Because back in 2000, you had dozens of choices for local dial-up ISPs. Now, with broadband, 49% of the country has access to exactly one provider -- and that provider will do *anything* to prevent a second broadband provider from coming to town. Back in 2000 you didn't have VOIP tech being blocked by providers who had their own competing VOIP service. You didn't have peer-to-peer services, which would get subsequently blocked by broadband ISPs. You didn't have AT&T forcing Apple to block Skype. You didn't have ISPs hijacking search queries to their own pet search engines. Or blocking Wallet. Or disallowing streaming video from certain sources. Or blocking tethering. Net Neutrality was needed, and is needed, to address these issues, and more, which will absolutely continue. Until there are three broadband providers in every market, Net Neutrality remains a necessity. Back in 2000 the internet was a wide open range, where no one needed locks on their doors. Things have changed a bit since then, electronically speaking. |
Shamrock007 User ID: 75621674 United States 05/17/2018 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75874818 Canada 05/17/2018 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75874818 Canada 05/17/2018 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75875121 United States 05/17/2018 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AndIWillAlwaysLoveYou User ID: 76266164 United States 05/17/2018 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because in 2000, 4 corporations didn't control 70% of American access to the 'net. Because back in 2000, you had dozens of choices for local dial-up ISPs. Now, with broadband, 49% of the country has access to exactly one provider -- and that provider will do *anything* to prevent a second broadband provider from coming to town. Back in 2000 you didn't have VOIP tech being blocked by providers who had their own competing VOIP service. You didn't have peer-to-peer services, which would get subsequently blocked by broadband ISPs. You didn't have AT&T forcing Apple to block Skype. You didn't have ISPs hijacking search queries to their own pet search engines. Or blocking Wallet. Or disallowing streaming video from certain sources. Or blocking tethering. Net Neutrality was needed, and is needed, to address these issues, and more, which will absolutely continue. Until there are three broadband providers in every market, Net Neutrality remains a necessity. Back in 2000 the internet was a wide open range, where no one needed locks on their doors. Things have changed a bit since then, electronically speaking. I don't think you understood what my point was, dum dum. NN didn't exist in 2000. Or 2001. Or 2002. Or 2003. Or 2004. Or 2005 or 2006. Or 2007. Or 2008. Or 2009. Or 2010. Or 2011. Or 2012. Or 2013. Or 2014. You say "Keep the internet the way it was" ....but "net neutrality" is NOT "the way it was"...it only existed for a short period of time. And remember, it's not what the name implies. Real "neutrality" is where the government fucks right off and doesn't regulate shit to death. Some regulation is fine, I think we all agree, but they go overboard. NN is overboard. You need to understand that these fucks name things the opposite of what they really are. Net Neutrality doesn't make anything neutral. The PATRIOT act is unpatriotic as fuck. Planned Parenthood means Premeditated Murder. etc. etc. |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 75190797 United States 05/17/2018 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because in 2000, 4 corporations didn't control 70% of American access to the 'net. Because back in 2000, you had dozens of choices for local dial-up ISPs. Now, with broadband, 49% of the country has access to exactly one provider -- and that provider will do *anything* to prevent a second broadband provider from coming to town. Back in 2000 you didn't have VOIP tech being blocked by providers who had their own competing VOIP service. You didn't have peer-to-peer services, which would get subsequently blocked by broadband ISPs. You didn't have AT&T forcing Apple to block Skype. You didn't have ISPs hijacking search queries to their own pet search engines. Or blocking Wallet. Or disallowing streaming video from certain sources. Or blocking tethering. Net Neutrality was needed, and is needed, to address these issues, and more, which will absolutely continue. Until there are three broadband providers in every market, Net Neutrality remains a necessity. Back in 2000 the internet was a wide open range, where no one needed locks on their doors. Things have changed a bit since then, electronically speaking. I don't think you understood what my point was, dum dum. NN didn't exist in 2000. Or 2001. Or 2002. Or 2003. Or 2004. Or 2005 or 2006. Or 2007. Or 2008. Or 2009. Or 2010. Or 2011. Or 2012. Or 2013. Or 2014. You say "Keep the internet the way it was" ....but "net neutrality" is NOT "the way it was"...it only existed for a short period of time. And remember, it's not what the name implies. Real "neutrality" is where the government fucks right off and doesn't regulate shit to death. Some regulation is fine, I think we all agree, but they go overboard. NN is overboard. You need to understand that these fucks name things the opposite of what they really are. Net Neutrality doesn't make anything neutral. The PATRIOT act is unpatriotic as fuck. Planned Parenthood means Premeditated Murder. etc. etc. i estimate that at least 90% of the people that are pro-Net New-Tyranny have never known the pleasure of hearing a 56K dial-up connection tone instead of a 28.8 tone. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69659698 United States 05/17/2018 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes. Yes. Yes. Down with Crapcast Att Verizon crooks who are trying to charge more money to access certain websites, or create the premium services. It is one thing to pay for speed upgrades, it is completely another to pay to access Netflix, youtube. Congress already wasted billions for cable providers to improve access to internet in the 90s and 2000s. All the money got stolen and wasted. No more. Internet provider should work to make the money. Net neutrality forever. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35799703 United States 05/17/2018 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes. Yes. Yes. Down with Crapcast Att Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69659698 Verizon crooks who are trying to charge more money to access certain websites, or create the premium services. It is one thing to pay for speed upgrades, it is completely another to pay to access Netflix, youtube. Congress already wasted billions for cable providers to improve access to internet in the 90s and 2000s. All the money got stolen and wasted. No more. Internet provider should work to make the money. Net neutrality forever. so then you are saying that Net Neutrality is good for us common users? . |
toxicbeowulf User ID: 64661752 United States 05/17/2018 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Senate today voted 52-47 to disapprove the FCC’s recent order replacing 2015’s net neutrality rules, a pleasant surprise for internet advocates and consumers throughout the country. Although the disapproval will almost certainly not lead to the new rules being undone, it is a powerful statement of solidarity with a constituency activated against this deeply unpopular order. Quoting: 5.0% [link to techcrunch.com (secure)] BWHAHAHAHA!!! ITS A NOTHING VOTE FOR THE PRIMARY S, THEY DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS AND ONLY FOOLS BELIEVE IT. AND THAT WOULD BE YOU... FOOL Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 05/17/2018 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You need to understand that these fucks name things the opposite of what they really are. Net Neutrality doesn't make anything neutral. The PATRIOT act is unpatriotic as fuck. Planned Parenthood means Premeditated Murder. etc. etc. Quoting: AndIWillAlwaysLoveYou Ah, so you understand that the "Restore Internet Freedom Act" does nothing of the kind. |
5.0% (OP) User ID: 76351847 Canada 05/17/2018 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i didn't i had no fucking idea what it meant ! To Watch Is To Be Prepared Not Just During The Bad Times But In The Good Times As Well A Good Watchman Never Lets His Or Her Guard Down Never Gives Occasion To The Enemy. Can't Shoot a Gun, Bait a Hook, Bake or Cook, You City Bitch! |
5.0% (OP) User ID: 76351847 Canada 05/17/2018 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and frankly i don't give a fuck the net i grew up with is gone now anyway. google is fucking dead youtube is fucked To Watch Is To Be Prepared Not Just During The Bad Times But In The Good Times As Well A Good Watchman Never Lets His Or Her Guard Down Never Gives Occasion To The Enemy. Can't Shoot a Gun, Bait a Hook, Bake or Cook, You City Bitch! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35799703 United States 05/17/2018 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |