How many people believe and trust in modern science, NASA, SpaceX, CERN, college scientific community and military space programs?

OK that makes sense. But why do we not see any part of Antarctica on the May 29th feed?

You still don't get it. Antarctica is tilted away from the sun. Even at the northernmost tip at 63+ degrees south the sun would only be 5 degrees over the horizon at its highest, it's at the limb of the earth and barely in the image at all and only for a few hours. To the extent that it is there, it's generally obscured by clouds.

63 degrees south should be getting almost 6 hours of sunlight right now.

Yeah, with a sun altitude of 5 degrees max. And that's for the sun, DSCOVR is closer than that to earth. Due to topocentric parallax even from King George Island, DSCOVR is only half a degree above the horizon at its max at this point in May. That's the very edge of the earth in the image, and cloud cover does matter. Unless it's a crystal clear day down there you're unlikely to spot the south shetland islands at all at this time of year and due to foreshortening it will be a tiny spec if you can spot it at all. You don't seem to understand basic geometry.

5.9 degrees sun altitude today on King George Island, not 5 degrees max as you stated. And what difference does being 1 million or 93 million miles away have to do with how much of a ball you can see?

I understand Astro's frustration, as he is asked to answer the same flawed criticisms over Apollo again and again.

I think that might be the 300th time he's had to explain that Hubble, nor any other telescope on Earth, has the resolution to image the Apollo sites.

As to Earth flatness, no FE believer masters spherical trigonometry before making their claims, nor has any explanation why spherical trigonometry works so perfectly in navigating the surface of the Earth.

Nor why Lunar Eclipses never appear as a flat line.

Nor why the Earth cannot be mapped on a flat surface without distortion, if the Earth is, in fact, flat.

Nor astronomical objects orbiting two different celestial poles, depending on where you are on Earth.

Nor the flight/sailing distance between South America and South Africa.

A globe solves all these things, and many more. What observation does the FE model solve?

Why do FE believers rapidly change from subject to subject as soon as the evidence mounts that they are incorrect?

Which brings me to my final question, that will doubtlessly be ignored: What evidence *can* convince the FE believer/arguer that the Earth is, in fact, a globe? Astro's videos don't do it, basic math doesn't do it, the observations above won't do it. What rational way *will* do it? Can you even imagine an observation that would convince *you* that the FE model is false?

Wouldn't a small NASA/SpaceX probe be a sensible expense since so many people now question the Apollo moon landings?

All it takes is an hour or two to find so many problems with what NASA and the space agencies present to us as truth.

Bullshit lies of space travel. You cowards and frauds are the demons aliens I mean lol