How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75427052 United States 06/17/2018 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour? Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0 Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school. Can you help me please? I found this one, but does not answer my question: [link to earthsky.org] You were absent. Gravity. Mass has gravity, spinning also creates gravity (think 2001) . So, two forms of attraction right there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75691838 United States 06/17/2018 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. I would think Gravity... Quoting: DuckNCover How would you explain why all the water on the Earth just doesn't fling into space via the it's centriFUGAL idiot! it's difficult to understand the difference between Centrifugal and Centripetal Force. . The Earth spins slowly: once per day. That is not fast enough to fling the water off. If your washing machine spin cycle turned at the rate of one turn per day, do you think it would be fast enough to spin the water out of the clothes? Also, there is really so such force as centrifugal. Centrifugal means "away from the center". When you spin a bucket of water, people call it centrifugal force, but if you let go, it does not fly away from the center, it flies tangentially. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76022655 United States 06/17/2018 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Scale, people don't understand scale......... Lol, people use their own little existence as a frame of reference for things so huge they can't wrap their brains around them. Take a 12 inch diameter globe and rotate it at the rate the earth spins, you'll have difficulty turning it so slowly. Every minute rotate it 1/12 of an inch. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75691838 United States 06/17/2018 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour? Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0 Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school. Can you help me please? I found this one, but does not answer my question: [link to earthsky.org] You were absent. Gravity. Mass has gravity, spinning also creates gravity (think 2001) . So, two forms of attraction right there. The spin on 2001 made the people stick to the inside edge. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75810200 United States 06/17/2018 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15365201 United States 06/17/2018 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour? Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0 Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school. Can you help me please? I found this one, but does not answer my question: [link to earthsky.org] God |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76138881 Sweden 06/17/2018 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. centri-fuga comes from the pre-latin (Romanian) where fuga meas to run away (from someone or something), to escape centri-fugal = to run away from center |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35799703 United States 06/17/2018 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76138881 Sweden 06/17/2018 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75774641 United States 06/17/2018 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Its a big glass ball around the whole planet that keeps the air in. It rotates at a different rate than the actual planet, and has a small window (like maybe a square mile or so). So when they are talking about a "launch window" when they need to launch something into that's what they really mean. They tell us it's weather related windows, but, hey anyone who doesn't understand how gravity vs the vacuum of space works would probably believe anything you tell them anyway, right? Mars does have enough gravity to keep its atmosphere. It is not so much the vacuum of space but the solar winds that are the issue. The vacuum of space doesn't suck. What you are calling "sucking" is the effect of high pressure to no pressure...say a spaceship in space has a leak...you think "space is sucking the air out" but that's not the case, space doesn't suck anything. The ship blows its air out because of a pressure differential. The ship is at earth's surface's air pressure (I will explain that next ok?) When the pressures are balanced of course the flow of air would stop, but because space is immeasurably large compared to the space ship, it appears to "suck all the air out". Pressure differential. Key words there ok so far?... Ok now back to Earth. Here on the surface, the weight of the air above us creates what we call "air pressure". We breathe using a principal of pressure differential as well. We are used to that surface air pressure, if you go into the mountains where the pressure is lower (because you have less air above where you are weighing down on itself as you go higher from the earth's surface)....it is harder to breathe. Pressure differential. Now lets go even further up to space where there's just a little bit of air on top of itself, so little it might just get sucked away....well that is about the boundary of the effect our planet's gravity has on its atmosphere, anything else would ...as hypothesized, flick off into space....but space isn't sucking anything, the pressures are very close to equal there. Now you know. Happy Father's Day. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75193661 United States 06/17/2018 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
syncro User ID: 75835116 United States 06/17/2018 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76682429 United States 06/17/2018 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. I would think Gravity... Quoting: DuckNCover How would you explain why all the water on the Earth just doesn't fling into space via the centripetal force of the Earth spinning on its axis.... Gravity...air has a weight for sure, sources say 14.7 lb on a square inch on Earth surface. On the other hand, the vacuum ofspace seems to have millions of times stronger sucking effect in the opposite direction, isn't it? There is no "sucking effect". You just float around in space. Without a force propelling you, you couldn't navigate. What keeps the space station in orbit if there is a "sucking effect" in space? Where are objects being sucked to? The gases and water are heavier than that in space because of gravity and centripetal force keeps us here. The sucking effect you are thinking of is like a pressurized cabin suddenly losing its pressure. If space had a sucking effect, it wouldn't take much energy to blast off this planet I would think. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76138881 Sweden 06/17/2018 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Its a big glass ball around the whole planet that keeps the air in. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641 It rotates at a different rate than the actual planet, and has a small window (like maybe a square mile or so). So when they are talking about a "launch window" when they need to launch something into that's what they really mean. ... Tell us why did they dropped the pressure inside the glass ball from 2.8 bar to 1 bar ? At what altitude is this glass shield ? Who made it ? |
Emerald_Glow 2.0 (OP) User ID: 76456970 United States 06/17/2018 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Make sense to consider that possibility. No one knows what is inside, as out of the 7800 miles of its length we only drilled to 11 miles so far, less, than 2%, but it looks, we have a dipole magnet with North pole is its North, South pole its South end and it rotates, therefore creates an electromagnetic field around it. Emerald_Glow 2.0 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20498828 United States 06/17/2018 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. When has anyone not felt movement while doing those? Answer - never. Article falls flat, like the earth. I call bullshit on crap article. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75774641 United States 06/17/2018 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Its a big glass ball around the whole planet that keeps the air in. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641 It rotates at a different rate than the actual planet, and has a small window (like maybe a square mile or so). So when they are talking about a "launch window" when they need to launch something into that's what they really mean. ... Tell us why did they dropped the pressure inside the glass ball from 2.8 bar to 1 bar ? At what altitude is this glass shield ? Who made it ? Hahaha you focused on the wrong part that was just the joke poking fun at OP the rest was a laymen's explanation as best as I could. After reading what you said about Centrifugal force...and the bucket moving tangent and not out if you let it go....even though I have always understood this, for some reason my brain is all curious as to why it happens? Why does the spinning of an object on a string not only seem to "pull outwards" but also "upwards" with a stronger force as the rotational velocity is increased? But why? Why does moving over a curve (continuous curve of a circle) push out and up? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76638891 United States 06/17/2018 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is. Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust. Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know. Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism. So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines. The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75486692 Canada 06/17/2018 12:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76580065 United States 06/17/2018 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. I would think Gravity... Quoting: DuckNCover How would you explain why all the water on the Earth just doesn't fling into space via the centripetal force of the Earth spinning on its axis.... Now that is the other good question. why does water in your cup stay still even when youre inside a car doing 150mph? according to you it would simply spill out of the glass from the force water always stays still. it's only coffee that spills in one's lap. anywho, I think OP forgot relativity |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76138881 Sweden 06/17/2018 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75774641 United States 06/17/2018 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891 Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust. Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know. Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism. So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines. The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth. Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76679244 United States 06/17/2018 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Article says this: Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20498828 When has anyone not felt movement while doing those? Answer - never. Article falls flat, like the earth. I call bullshit on crap article. why do you lie? You don't feel constant movement. You only feel acceleration |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76638891 United States 06/17/2018 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891 Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust. Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know. Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism. So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines. The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth. Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world. How did you know? Thanks. Oh, you meant to be sarcastic but accidentally spoke the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75774641 United States 06/17/2018 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. So you don't know this 'Earth in a glass ball' theory actually exist and it has many adepts ? Yes, And Flat Earth....and Holographic Earth. Those ideas are unconvincing to me. I am more of a "holographic universe" guy myself, but the holograph is what we call "matter" which, in my hypothesis, is light encapsulated by sound on all 6 sides and in all three dimensions (I do not hypothesize 4th dimensional "matter" if such a thing exists I would imagine it would need to be encapsulated on all 6 sides and all 4 dimensions?). But none of this explains the original topic. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75774641 United States 06/17/2018 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891 Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust. Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know. Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism. So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines. The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth. Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world. How did you know? Thanks. Oh, you meant to be sarcastic but accidentally spoke the truth. Of course I did! Can you please explain how it all really works pretty please? I think only one with your great knowledge can make sense, so please enlighten us?! |
seekinginformation User ID: 76685583 United States 06/17/2018 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour? Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0 Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school. Can you help me please? I found this one, but does not answer my question: [link to earthsky.org] It is an electric universe. Think of it Nicola Tesla said, "Id you want to understand the universe, think in terms of frequency and vibration...". Seekinginformation |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76138881 Sweden 06/17/2018 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. So you don't know this 'Earth in a glass ball' theory actually exist and it has many adepts ? Yes, And Flat Earth....and Holographic Earth. Those ideas are unconvincing to me. no, not flat but a ball Earth in a ball crystal with gravity and all the rest.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76638891 United States 06/17/2018 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891 Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust. Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know. Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism. So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines. The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth. Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world. How did you know? Thanks. Oh, you meant to be sarcastic but accidentally spoke the truth. Of course I did! Can you please explain how it all really works pretty please? I think only one with your great knowledge can make sense, so please enlighten us?! Yes demand the impossible so you can sit back and feel smart because someone doesn't know everything, just like everyone else. I don't have all the answers. I'm just smart enough not to believe known liars who profit from the liee. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54200195 United States 06/17/2018 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of.. Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891 Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust. Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know. Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism. So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines. The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth. What are you talking about? Eric Dubay, is that you? Let me tell you why most people are opposed to Flat Earthers: It is because of their obnoxious arrogance in pushing their false teachings. Gravity does affect dust. That is why there is more dust on the top of the cabinet than on the ceiling. A gust of wind will still up the dust into the air, and it will do similar to the surface of the water. The wind is stronger than gravity, but if there is no wind, gravity is still there. |