Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,127 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,686,625
Pageviews Today: 2,332,762Threads Today: 579Posts Today: 10,717
06:08 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75427052
United States
06/17/2018 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour?

Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school.

Can you help me please?

I found this one, but does not answer my question:

[link to earthsky.org]


1dunno1
 Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0


You were absent. Gravity. Mass has gravity, spinning also creates gravity (think 2001) . So, two forms of attraction right there.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75691838
United States
06/17/2018 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
I would think Gravity...

How would you explain why all the water on the Earth just doesn't fling into space via the centripetal force of the Earth spinning on its axis....
 Quoting: DuckNCover


it's centriFUGAL idiot!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76138881


it's difficult to understand the difference
between Centrifugal and Centripetal Force.
.
 Quoting: freddie 0


The Earth spins slowly: once per day. That is not fast enough to fling the water off.

If your washing machine spin cycle turned at the rate of one turn per day, do you think it would be fast enough to spin the water out of the clothes?

Also, there is really so such force as centrifugal. Centrifugal means "away from the center". When you spin a bucket of water, people call it centrifugal force, but if you let go, it does not fly away from the center, it flies tangentially.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76022655
United States
06/17/2018 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Scale, people don't understand scale.........
Lol, people use their own little existence as a frame of reference for things so huge they can't wrap their brains around them.

Take a 12 inch diameter globe and rotate it at the rate the earth spins, you'll have difficulty turning it so slowly. Every minute rotate it 1/12 of an inch.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75691838
United States
06/17/2018 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour?

Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school.

Can you help me please?

I found this one, but does not answer my question:

[link to earthsky.org]


1dunno1
 Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0


You were absent. Gravity. Mass has gravity, spinning also creates gravity (think 2001) . So, two forms of attraction right there.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75427052


The spin on 2001 made the people stick to the inside edge.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75810200
United States
06/17/2018 11:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Flat earth. Duh.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15365201
United States
06/17/2018 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour?

Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school.

Can you help me please?

I found this one, but does not answer my question:

[link to earthsky.org]


1dunno1
 Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0


God
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76138881
Sweden
06/17/2018 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
centri-fuga comes from the pre-latin (Romanian) where fuga meas to run away (from someone or something), to escape

centri-fugal = to run away from center
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35799703
United States
06/17/2018 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
centri-fuga comes from the pre-latin (Romanian) where fuga meas to run away (from someone or something), to escape

centri-fugal = to run away from center
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76138881


well, then Centripetal must mean: run towards the center.

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76138881
Sweden
06/17/2018 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
well, then Centripetal must mean: run towards the center.
 Quoting: freddie 0

not run, pulled ..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75774641
United States
06/17/2018 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Its a big glass ball around the whole planet that keeps the air in. It rotates at a different rate than the actual planet, and has a small window (like maybe a square mile or so). So when they are talking about a "launch window" when they need to launch something into that's what they really mean. They tell us it's weather related windows, but, hey anyone who doesn't understand how gravity vs the vacuum of space works would probably believe anything you tell them anyway, right?

Mars does have enough gravity to keep its atmosphere. It is not so much the vacuum of space but the solar winds that are the issue.

The vacuum of space doesn't suck. What you are calling "sucking" is the effect of high pressure to no pressure...say a spaceship in space has a leak...you think "space is sucking the air out" but that's not the case, space doesn't suck anything. The ship blows its air out because of a pressure differential. The ship is at earth's surface's air pressure (I will explain that next ok?) When the pressures are balanced of course the flow of air would stop, but because space is immeasurably large compared to the space ship, it appears to "suck all the air out". Pressure differential. Key words there ok so far?...

Ok now back to Earth. Here on the surface, the weight of the air above us creates what we call "air pressure". We breathe using a principal of pressure differential as well. We are used to that surface air pressure, if you go into the mountains where the pressure is lower (because you have less air above where you are weighing down on itself as you go higher from the earth's surface)....it is harder to breathe.
Pressure differential.

Now lets go even further up to space where there's just a little bit of air on top of itself, so little it might just get sucked away....well that is about the boundary of the effect our planet's gravity has on its atmosphere, anything else would ...as hypothesized, flick off into space....but space isn't sucking anything, the pressures are very close to equal there.

Now you know. Happy Father's Day.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75193661
United States
06/17/2018 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
I know the earth is spinning. Cause I feel dizzy all the time.
syncro

User ID: 75835116
United States
06/17/2018 12:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Bignessology
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76682429
United States
06/17/2018 12:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
I would think Gravity...

How would you explain why all the water on the Earth just doesn't fling into space via the centripetal force of the Earth spinning on its axis....
 Quoting: DuckNCover


Gravity...air has a weight for sure, sources say 14.7 lb on a square inch on Earth surface.
On the other hand, the vacuum ofspace seems to have millions of times stronger sucking effect in the opposite direction, isn't it?
 Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0


There is no "sucking effect". You just float around in space. Without a force propelling you, you couldn't navigate. What keeps the space station in orbit if there is a "sucking effect" in space? Where are objects being sucked to? The gases and water are heavier than that in space because of gravity and centripetal force keeps us here.

The sucking effect you are thinking of is like a pressurized cabin suddenly losing its pressure. If space had a sucking effect, it wouldn't take much energy to blast off this planet I would think.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76138881
Sweden
06/17/2018 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Its a big glass ball around the whole planet that keeps the air in.

It rotates at a different rate than the actual planet, and has a small window (like maybe a square mile or so).

So when they are talking about a "launch window" when they need to launch something into that's what they really mean.
...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641


Tell us why did they dropped the pressure inside the glass ball from 2.8 bar to 1 bar ?

At what altitude is this glass shield ?

Who made it ?
Emerald_Glow 2.0  (OP)

User ID: 76456970
United States
06/17/2018 12:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Electromagnetism.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32937641


Make sense to consider that possibility. No one knows what is inside, as out of the 7800 miles of its length we only drilled to 11 miles so far, less, than 2%, but it looks, we have a dipole magnet with North pole is its North, South pole its South end and it rotates, therefore creates an electromagnetic field around it.
Emerald_Glow 2.0
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20498828
United States
06/17/2018 12:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Article says this: Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving.

When has anyone not felt movement while doing those? Answer - never. Article falls flat, like the earth. I call bullshit on crap article.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75774641
United States
06/17/2018 12:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Its a big glass ball around the whole planet that keeps the air in.

It rotates at a different rate than the actual planet, and has a small window (like maybe a square mile or so).

So when they are talking about a "launch window" when they need to launch something into that's what they really mean.
...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641


Tell us why did they dropped the pressure inside the glass ball from 2.8 bar to 1 bar ?

At what altitude is this glass shield ?

Who made it ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76138881


Hahaha you focused on the wrong part hf that was just the joke poking fun at OP the rest was a laymen's explanation as best as I could.

After reading what you said about Centrifugal force...and the bucket moving tangent and not out if you let it go....even though I have always understood this, for some reason my brain is all curious as to why it happens? Why does the spinning of an object on a string not only seem to "pull outwards" but also "upwards" with a stronger force as the rotational velocity is increased? But why? Why does moving over a curve (continuous curve of a circle) push out and up?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76638891
United States
06/17/2018 12:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is.

Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust.

Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know.

Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism.

So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines.

The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth.

5asheeplebah
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75486692
Canada
06/17/2018 12:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
electromagnetism
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76653321


cool2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76580065
United States
06/17/2018 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
I would think Gravity...

How would you explain why all the water on the Earth just doesn't fling into space via the centripetal force of the Earth spinning on its axis....
 Quoting: DuckNCover


Now that is the other good question.

rockon
 Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0


why does water in your cup stay still even when youre inside a car doing 150mph? according to you it would simply spill out of the glass from the force
 Quoting: T-Man


water always stays still. it's only coffee that spills in one's lap.

anywho, I think OP forgot relativity
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76138881
Sweden
06/17/2018 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
... that was just the joke poking fun at OP ...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641

So you don't know this 'Earth in a glass ball' theory actually exist and it has many adepts ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75774641
United States
06/17/2018 12:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is.

Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust.

Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know.

Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism.

So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines.

The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth.

5asheeplebah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76679244
United States
06/17/2018 12:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Article says this: Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving.

When has anyone not felt movement while doing those? Answer - never. Article falls flat, like the earth. I call bullshit on crap article.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20498828


why do you lie? You don't feel constant movement. You only feel acceleration
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76638891
United States
06/17/2018 12:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is.

Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust.

Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know.

Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism.

So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines.

The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth.

5asheeplebah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641


How did you know? Thanks.

Oh, you meant to be sarcastic but accidentally spoke the truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75774641
United States
06/17/2018 12:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
... that was just the joke poking fun at OP ...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641

So you don't know this 'Earth in a glass ball' theory actually exist and it has many adepts ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76138881


Yes, And Flat Earth....and Holographic Earth. Those ideas are unconvincing to me.

I am more of a "holographic universe" guy myself, but the holograph is what we call "matter" which, in my hypothesis, is light encapsulated by sound on all 6 sides and in all three dimensions (I do not hypothesize 4th dimensional "matter" if such a thing exists I would imagine it would need to be encapsulated on all 6 sides and all 4 dimensions?). But none of this explains the original topic.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75774641
United States
06/17/2018 12:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is.

Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust.

Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know.

Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism.

So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines.

The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth.

5asheeplebah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641


How did you know? Thanks.

Oh, you meant to be sarcastic but accidentally spoke the truth.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


Of course I did! Can you please explain how it all really works pretty please? I think only one with your great knowledge can make sense, so please enlighten us?!
seekinginformation

User ID: 76685583
United States
06/17/2018 12:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of near 1000 miles/hour?

Sorry, I forgot...or was absent we we learned in the school.

Can you help me please?

I found this one, but does not answer my question:

[link to earthsky.org]


1dunno1
 Quoting: Emerald_Glow 2.0


It is an electric universe. Think of it Nicola Tesla said, "Id you want to understand the universe, think in terms of frequency and vibration...".
Seekinginformation
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76138881
Sweden
06/17/2018 12:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
... that was just the joke poking fun at OP ...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641

So you don't know this 'Earth in a glass ball' theory actually exist and it has many adepts ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76138881


Yes, And Flat Earth....and Holographic Earth. Those ideas are unconvincing to me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641

no, not flat but a ball Earth in a ball crystal with gravity and all the rest..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76638891
United States
06/17/2018 12:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is.

Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust.

Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know.

Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism.

So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines.

The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth.

5asheeplebah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


Oh wise one, thank you for your great insights filled to the brim with useful information. You bring forth such clarity in the world, I am sure you are a highly valued member of your society who has made and continues to make great contributions to it and your world.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641


How did you know? Thanks.

Oh, you meant to be sarcastic but accidentally spoke the truth.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


Of course I did! Can you please explain how it all really works pretty please? I think only one with your great knowledge can make sense, so please enlighten us?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75774641


Yes demand the impossible so you can sit back and feel smart because someone doesn't know everything, just like everyone else.

I don't have all the answers.

I'm just smart enough not to believe known liars who profit from the liee.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 54200195
United States
06/17/2018 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How would you call the force that keeps a gaseous layer on a solid ball against near perfect vacuum, even, if the ball spins with a velocity of..
Threads like this just highlight how powerful the scientism indoctrination is.

Gravity? They can't detect it, explain how much mass creates it, or how it holds trillions of tons of water down, but not a piece of dust.

Mars? Oh yeah, you've been there, so you know.

Made up excuses, sad pathetic attempts to cling to the biggest cult in western society, Scientism.

So pathetic. No wonder they love their TV, smart phones, and vaccines.

The ultimate cognitive dissonance, but cars work, so All science must be truth.

5asheeplebah
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76638891


What are you talking about? Eric Dubay, is that you?

Let me tell you why most people are opposed to Flat Earthers: It is because of their obnoxious arrogance in pushing their false teachings.

Gravity does affect dust. That is why there is more dust on the top of the cabinet than on the ceiling.

A gust of wind will still up the dust into the air, and it will do similar to the surface of the water. The wind is stronger than gravity, but if there is no wind, gravity is still there.





GLP