Horowitz and Wray testify before Senate Judiciary Committee on the IG report Today!

Lets attach lie detectors to the and have them tesitfy

Shock collars?

I can't wait to hear what they say when the first question is most likely going to be "Who is Attorney #2? and why did you leave their name out"

Oh and who is the Viva La resitance agent. Why did they leave so many names out of an official report. What was taken out and who requested it.

Thanks for the pin!

This will be interesting

Strozk doesn’t want immunity either

Any word on when he would testify? I took his whole "no immunity testimony" rhetoric as a warning to his co-conspirators that he will talk if not protected.

Bet they will not ask about that statment regarding hillary's ((("crimes against children")))

No I haven’t heard.

They need to drag all these aholes in ASAP

We’ve waited years for justice

Pretty sure nothing will happen to any them at this point but, they need to be public ally shamed at the very least

All should lose benefits like McCabe did too

When they testify this fast after the release of the IG report you can bet your ass they've been rehearsing this shit for several weeks already, they tell us all the biased shit that those at the top of the FBI have said/done along with all the conflicts of interest such as friends investigating friends then they tell us they found no wrong doing, then what do they recommend for the FBI after the IG report? agency wide anti-bias training, the lie to Americas face then they punish rank and file for the wrong doings of those at the top..

You're gonna see the same damn shit we saw when they questioned lerner, hillary, comey etc, Republicans are gonna ask softball questions then talk hard afterwards and the Dems are gonna use their questioning to kiss the ass of those being questioned and tell them what wonderful services they've done for the country..

Its as if they're intentionally provoking Americans..

Under oath? Probably not. Public testimony? Probably not.

Softball questions? Assured. Consequences? Zero. Fucks given? Also, zero.

You absolutely know the script.

where are the FBI whistleblowers ... will they be testifying?

Because it's clear we can't clean house all at once, so we need to start dismantling them piece by piece.

First piece that NEEDS TO GO IS ROSENSTEIN.

This line of questioning would perfectly set him up to be impeached or fired.

HOROWITZ NEEDS TO GET WITH THE PROGRAM TODAY

HOROWITZ NEEDS TO POINT OUT WHO COVERED UP URANIUM ONE


ROD FUCKFACE ROSENSHITSTAIN

Devin Nunes@DevinNunes
Can anyone tell me who the DOJ lawyer is that speaks French via text in the IG report? This will save a lot of time in the hearings this week so my colleagues won’t have to ask this question...

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

“I am numb,” the attorney wrote on Nov. 9, 2016, the day after President Trump’s election.

“I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,” the lawyer continued, apparently referring to the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe.

The attorney’s messages show that he was distressed at the FBI’s decision in October 2016 to re-open the investigation into Clinton’s emails. Democrats have claimed that decision hurt Clinton at the polls.

The FBI lawyer also suggested that he would work to resist the Trump administration.

“Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?” one FBI lawyer wrote on Nov. 22, 2016.

“Hell no. Viva le resistance,” the future Mueller attorney responded.

Last Edited by BeenAround® on 06/18/2018 12:16 PM

I believe Strzok's testimony is predicated upon an undisclosed agreement/plea that was made with Huber.

In exchange for leniency Strzok agreed to publicly spill the beans about his role in this debacle since political optics will obviously come into play.

It is no secret Strzok is guilty as hell for committing a multitude of federal offenses and no sane defense attorney would allow him to openly testify under different circumstances.

This is interesting since names were redacted IG Report

We may be able to figure out who’s who....!!!!!!


Please produce all documents and communications, including but not limited to emails, memoranda, notes, text messages, iPhone instant messages, and voicemails, for the period January 1, 2015, to the present referring or relating to the FBI’s Midyear Exam investigation, the presence of classified information on Secretary of State Clinton’s private email server, or candidates for the 2016 presidential election for the following custodians:


James Comey;
James Rybicki;
Andrew McCabe;
John Giacalone
James Turgal;
David Bowdich;
Jonathan Moffa;
Peter Strzok;
Lisa Page;
Trisha Anderson;
E.W. Priestap;
George Toscas;
Randy Coleman;
Brian Brooks;
Michael Kortan; and
James Baker.



[link to www.hsgac.senate.gov (secure)]

[link to www.judicialwatch.org (secure)]





.

Strzok doesn’t want inmunity?

He is going to change the narrative ... he is going to say of course he was biased against Trump - he had info that Trump was colluding with Russia!

hoping to be able to watch

CSPAN is covering it

The guy's a liar. What's the point having him testify?

Will it be online? I don't have cable...

IT'S KINDA CARZY IN THAT HE HAS TO PRETEND THAT THINGS ARE NOT AS BAD AS THE ....'ARE'....GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!