29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap

I am not the person that wrote the analysis, but, it is the first time I have seen it written out.

I thought it was interesting and important for everyone to read.

If you don't agree, well, don't read it.

James Dunlap
July 13 at 7:52 PM

Article 1 of the indictment states that the Russian government actively set up multiple intelligence units (known as the GRU) with the sole aim of interfering with the 2016 election. Two of these units, 26165, and 74455, were specifically tasked with acquiring and releasing stolen documents via hacking.

so let me see here, 12 hackers, 2 new units, all so they can only get some emails out of Democrat servers? flimsy.

Article 2 specifically calls this a "conspiracy" and states that the 12 indicted Russians had contacts with "persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury."

but conspiracies don't exist to the 'system' that is funny... are the spam emails with attachments to my email account part of a Russian conspiracy against me too?

Article 3: The aforementioned Russian intelligence units deliberately targeted the Clinton campaign.

this is based on one fact only, it is only exploring that side of the aisle...

Article 4: They deliberately targeted the DNC as a whole.

hard to believe, did they hit every state and reps computers too?

Article 6: In June of 2016, they released TENS OF THOUSANDS of hacked documents using fictitious online personas.

why use fake names if you really want to cause trouble?

Article 10: One of the intelligence officers, Boris Antonov, oversaw a department within 26165 tasked with hacking the U.S. military, governmental (i.e., political) and non-governmental organizations. [i.e., they were spying on every level of our gov't].

so what is new here...? why are Democrats and their lax security eg. HRC's handling of emails not at issue here?


Articles 12-18: The Russian hackers often used various online aliases, both male and female, such as (but not limited to) "Kate Milton," "James McMorgans," and "Karen Millen." Sergey Morgachev, another Russian hacker, was a Lt. Colonel in the Russian military. He created the hacking malware used by dept. 26165, known as "X-Agent." Another hacker named in the indictment, Nikolay Kozachek, was a Lt. Captain in the Russian military. Artem Malyshev (also named in the indictment) was a Second Lieutenant in the Russian military. Aleksandr Osadchuk (also named in the indictment) is a Colonel in the Russian Military. He oversaw the creation and dissemination of anti-Clinton material online.

maybe it was Bernie? did you ask him if he ordered this?


Article 19: Russian Military Officer Aleksey Potemkin, assigned to 74455, supervised the creation of fake social media accounts used (among other things) in the release of DNC documents.

oh.. nobody has ever done this before... ooohh.

Article 21: Over 300 individuals affiliated with the DNC were SUCCESSFULLY targeted. (Article 21 is lengthy, and includes a detailed, play-by-play account of how 26165 and 74455 achieved their aims. Spoiler alert: It's crazy).

so tell us: did they get anything good or just hook-up info between HRC and Huma?

Article 24, subsection B: The Russian's hacking of the DNC was so advanced that they were able to monitor individual computers in real time. Subsection C states that their malware sent actual screenshots of DNC computer activity to a server in Arizona that the Russians had access to. They were also able to capture keystrokes entered by DCCC employees.

and the CIA and FBI were doing the same to them at that exact time right? or is it NSA?

Article 24, subsection D: They monitored individual DNC / DCCC employees for hours on end, and obtained information about DNC fundraising plans and even banking information (as well as other personal information).

so this was given to the Republicans and they go their money instead right?

Article 26 subsection A: By June 2016 the Russians had complete access to 33 DNC computers, totally and completely.

and this accomplished what exactly?

Article 27: The GRU gained access to information regarding DNC opposition research, field operation plans, and the Benghazi operation.

and this info went where... maybe it stayed in Russia?

Article 28, subsection B: Aside from the server in Arizona, the GRU also stored data to a server in Illinois, to which they filtered large gigabytes of stolen information via a program they developed known as "X-Tunnel."

if the Russian's used tunneling software to move volumes of data out of DNC servers to other rented? servers in USA, who was tracking data usage and activity logs?

Article 32: The DNC became aware of Russian attempts to hack their servers and hired a security firm to identify the extent of the intrusions. The security firm (identified in the indictment only as "company 1") also put in place measures to halt GRU access to DNC computers, but, despite this, the GRU was so efficient that they continued to maintain access via "X-Agent" well through October of 2016.

company was incompetent, likely political hack appointment

Article 33: The GRU immediately became aware of "company 1's" (referring here to the security firm that the DNC hired) efforts, and took countermeasures in response. This included investigating / hacking "company 1" itself, and later, apparently as a retaliatory measure against the DNC, setting up a wesbsite that redirected from a DNC online political donations website, to another website set up by the GRU (in other words, the GRU took funds from DNC donors, using the pretext of a false DNC donations website).

and their accounting and admin staff did not see this?


Articles 35-36: The GRU set up another website, the sole purpose of which was to release stolen DNC documents. They created fake social media accounts that falsely attributed this website's creation to a group of "American hacktivists." It received over 1 million hits.

where was their buddies.. the social media Co's in not helping with this?

Article 37: The GRU has also released stolen documents dating back to 2015 (i.e., they've been up to this for quite a while).

oh oh.. getting embarrassing now

Article 40: The notion of a "lone Romanian hacker" being responsible for the DNC leaks was a fiction deliberately created by the GRU and disseminated via fake social media accounts.

any I.T. person could figure that out I think

Article 42: Using a popular blogging site, the GRU set up a blog that used the most "searched for" keywords by conspiracy theorists, (e.g., "Illuminati," "Worldwide," "Conspiracy," et. al.), -and used this website to further disseminate the "lone Romanian hacker" conspiracy theory. (Article 46 of the indictment further states that later entries on this blog site posted articles positing that the released, stolen documents had "nothing to do with Russia.")

okay but nobody believes conspiracy theorists anyways right?

Article 43, Subsection A: An individual the indictment identifies only as "a known member of congress" contacted an online GRU dummy persona, ("Guccifer 2.0") and requested stolen documents related to their political opponent, and the GRU / "Guccifer" responded by giving said member of congress access to the stolen data they were requesting.

did this help that person win the election?


Article 43, Subsection B: The GRU released stolen documents to what the indictment identifies as "a lobbyist and online source of political news."

which political party or either can view?

Subsection C: "Guccifer" / The GRU sent stolen documents pertaining to the "Black Lives Matter" movement to a reporter (unidentified in the indictment), to which the reporter not only responded, but offered to write an article using said information.

why does DNC has secret BLM info?

Article 44: The GRU, posing as "Guccifer 2.0" wrote to a person who was in regular contact with SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. (The indictment includes direct quotes of their online conversation, and this is CLEARLY referring to Roger Stone).

did this result in helping Trump Campaign to win?

Article 45, subsection B: The GRU, using an alias, contacted a U.S. reporter (unnamed in the indictment) and ultimately gave them access to stolen DNC data.

was this data published or passed on?

Articles 47-49: Here the indictment refers to an organization, identified only as "Organization 1," [I'm thinking, Wikileaks] -which actually reached out to the GRU aliases seeking the stolen emails / data. "Organization 1" is directly quoted by the indictment as having communicated to "Guccifer," that they should "send [Organization 1] any new material [i.e., stolen data] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." Organization 1 was given, and later released, said data, approximately 3 days before the Democratic National Convention. In total, between October and November of 2016, over 50,000 stolen documents were released.

did this effect outcome at DNC?

Articles 50-79 : Lists the counts against the 11 Russian Military Personnel, which include charges of 1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against The United States, 2) Aggravated Identity Theft, 3) Conspiracy to Launder Money [according to the indictment, over 95,000 USD$ was laundered], i.e. using cryptocurrency, that was then use to register domain names, set up websites, create server infrastructure, et. al.,3) The Use of Transferred Money To Commit Crimes Against The United States, 4) General Unlawful Conspiracy [It should be noted that many of these counts have sub-crimes attached to them, such as unlawful hacking, etc.].

penny anny for a high level Russian op, sounds more like some rogue hacking club to me?


So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it.

Guatemala?
Shouldn't you be focusing on sinkholes and Chagas disease. STFU you Democrat plant.

I am not the person that wrote the analysis, but, it is the first time I have seen it written out.

I thought it was interesting and important for everyone to read.

If you don't agree, well, don't read it.

I am not the person that wrote the analysis, but, it is the first time I have seen it written out.

I thought it was interesting and important for everyone to read.

If you don't agree, well, don't read it.

Do you realize you can plead whatever you want in an indictment without having to append any evidence to it? That a Grand Jury only sees alleged evidence cherry-picked by the prosecutor and unchallenged by the defence? That none of these allegations have so much as been tested at trial? Quite apart from your deliberately misreading the indictment which makes no allegation any American knew they were dealing with alleged GRU officers or agents.

Didn't think so. Don't apply to law school anytime soon!

Isn't this your cute little comment at the end?

"So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it".

Fucking dumb ass...

Isn't this your cute little comment at the end?

"So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it".

Fucking dumb ass...

Pretty much a nothingburger of an indictment.

[link to dailycaller.com]

Nunes said that the committee’s investigators have had information on the Russian spies for over a year. The committee began investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign back in January 2017. Committee Republicans ended their investigation on March 12, saying that they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

Nunes said that if the information in the Intelligence Committee’s report had been declassified, “the American people would have known we basically wrote the indictment for Mueller.”

“The House Republicans without the support of Democrats, wrote the indictment for the Mueller special counsel, essentially,” added Nunes.

No call for extradition of the indited individuals.

Can't have them showing up and asking to see the evidence.

Oops! We can't show them the evidence because we have already wiped the DNC servers.

OK you'll just have to take our word for it because we know you did it.

Maybe this is a show for the gullible.

What happened to the indictments against Concorde Management and Concorde Catering that Mueller filed?

Concorde Management showed up in court, and demanded discovery of the evidence. That was months ago. Mueller has been stalling ever since. If he didn't have the evidence yet, why did he indict?

A prosecutor can't just charge people without evidence.

Mueller even argued that the indictments had been improperly served. The judge said, "They're here in court, now." Only the defendant can argue improper service. The plaintiff wants them in court. They showed up at the appropriate date and Mueller wasn't ready.

Mueller is discrediting the whole American court system.

No, it isn't. It is how this person that did the analysis ended it.

Dumb ass.

Well maybe you should have stated that early on, and now instead you got people assuming it was you, Dumb ass

Apparently nobody is really appreciating the significance here.

Do you remember the aftermath of the Intelligence Committee report?

Democrats shrieked about how it was a nothing burger, it was biased and basically worthless partisan BS.

….then Mueller repackages it as an indictment against 12 Russians who will never face trial - and BOOM! It's proof of 'muh collusion' and justification of Mueller's witch hunt!

James Dunlap
July 13 at 7:52 PM

Ok, so I've actually sat down and read the entire 29 page Mueller indictment against the 12 Russian intelligence officers, and it is totally insane. I literally can't believe the scope of this thing. I'm making this status public (i.e., shareable), because people need to know about this shit. There is no way you can read the actual indictment and not conclude that 1) there WAS a RUSSIAN conspiracy, 2) that the scope of that conspiracy was GARGANTUAN, 3) that it was organized BY THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT [i.e., there's no way Putin didn't know about this], 4) That people connected to the Trump campaign [and, shockingly, other U.S. Gov't officials] WERE INVOLVED, and 5) this is just the beginning. If Mueller has already uncovered this amount of information with such specificity regarding the goings-on in far-away Russia, there's NO WAY some serious shit isn't going to hit the fan going forward right here in the U.S.

So, without further ado, here are the highlights:

Article 1 of the indictment states that the Russian government actively set up multiple intelligence units (known as the GRU) with the sole aim of interfering with the 2016 election. Two of these units, 26165, and 74455, were specifically tasked with acquiring and releasing stolen documents via hacking.

i think it’s better that the secret bullshit the DNC and Clinton campaign tried to pull is out in the open from Seth rich handing off the “stolen”incriminating evidence ... I also think any college kid with a few semesters of computer science behind them could have hacked Clinton’s bullshit server and the United States is better off having read those disgusting emails

Article 2 specifically calls this a "conspiracy" and states that the 12 indicted Russians had contacts with "persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury."

any so called conspiracy that sheds sunlight and disinfectant on the shadow government secrets is a good thing for the common man

Article 3: The aforementioned Russian intelligence units deliberately targeted the Clinton campaign.

good that evil ass campaign needed to be exposed ... heroes in my book

Article 4: They deliberately targeted the DNC as a whole.

good job on exposing the massive corruption to the American people and world ... also do you not think America is doing the same ass shit all,around the world ... Pot meet Kettle

Article 6: In June of 2016, they released TENS OF THOUSANDS of hacked documents using fictitious online personas.

awesome let freedom fucking ring and expose the deep state ass clowns

Article 10: One of the intelligence officers, Boris Antonov, oversaw a department within 26165 tasked with hacking the U.S. military, governmental (i.e., political) and non-governmental organizations. [i.e., they were spying on every level of our gov't].

Oh dear.. what will we do ... we been doing the same god damn shit to them since 1945 ... you cocksuckers writing this shit must live in a devoid history bubble

Articles 12-18: The Russian hackers often used various online aliases, both male and female, such as (but not limited to) "Kate Milton," "James McMorgans," and "Karen Millen." Sergey Morgachev, another Russian hacker, was a Lt. Colonel in the Russian military. He created the hacking malware used by dept. 26165, known as "X-Agent." Another hacker named in the indictment, Nikolay Kozachek, was a Lt. Captain in the Russian military. Artem Malyshev (also named in the indictment) was a Second Lieutenant in the Russian military. Aleksandr Osadchuk (also named in the indictment) is a Colonel in the Russian Military. He oversaw the creation and dissemination of anti-Clinton material online.

again you don’t think we are doing the same shit all over the world as well as every other country capable of doing such you ignorant fool ? They would be stupid not to...

Article 19: Russian Military Officer Aleksey Potemkin, assigned to 74455, supervised the creation of fake social media accounts used (among other things) in the release of DNC documents.

and yet again you don’t think we are doing the same shit all over the world as well as every other country capable of doing such you ignorant fool ? They would be stupid not to...

Article 21: Over 300 individuals affiliated with the DNC were SUCCESSFULLY targeted. (Article 21 is lengthy, and includes a detailed, play-by-play account of how 26165 and 74455 achieved their aims. Spoiler alert: It's crazy).

aweome... there should have been more from any government or party workers engaged in behavior to fuck over the United States people

Article 24, subsection B: The Russian's hacking of the DNC was so advanced that they were able to monitor individual computers in real time. Subsection C states that their malware sent actual screenshots of DNC computer activity to a server in Arizona that the Russians had access to. They were also able to capture keystrokes entered by DCCC employees.

objection ... you fucking gullible dickwad ... the FBI nor any government agency has ever looked at or had access to any DNC servers to forensically make that claim... that claim is fucking hearsay by a bullshit company hired by the dnc ... don’t be such a gullible indoctrinated ass clown

Article 24, subsection D: They monitored individual DNC / DCCC employees for hours on end, and obtained information about DNC fundraising plans and even banking information (as well as other personal information).

good wish they had monitored more on both sides of aisle if we are stupid enough to toss around sensitive information willy fucking nilly

Article 26 subsection A: By June 2016 the Russians had complete access to 33 DNC computers, totally and completely.

zero fucking chance of knowing that since DNC servers were never forensically looked at but cia nsa fbi etc. and even if they were the DNC I’d fucking stupid with their lax counter measures

Article 27: The GRU gained access to information regarding DNC opposition research, field operation plans, and the Benghazi operation.

bengazi was a fucking disgrace of massive proportion needs to all come out how those men were left to fucking die

Article 28, subsection B: Aside from the server in Arizona, the GRU also stored data to a server in Illinois, to which they filtered large gigabytes of stolen information via a program they developed known as "X-Tunnel."

pot calling kettle black again ... you don’t think every country capable is doing this shit moron.

Article 32: The DNC became aware of Russian attempts to hack their servers and hired a security firm to identify the extent of the intrusions. The security firm (identified in the indictment only as "company 1") also put in place measures to halt GRU access to DNC computers, but, despite this, the GRU was so efficient that they continued to maintain access via "X-Agent" well through October of 2016.

security firm my ass ... if they exist at all they suck at their fucking jobs ... proper protocol was to hand over to fbi and cia and nsa to forensically backtrack but the DNC continues to hide why it didn’t alert and use proper authorities... hiding something of course logic is easy

Article 33: The GRU immediately became aware of "company 1's" (referring here to the security firm that the DNC hired) efforts, and took countermeasures in response. This included investigating / hacking "company 1" itself, and later, apparently as a retaliatory measure against the DNC, setting up a wesbsite that redirected from a DNC online political donations website, to another website set up by the GRU (in other words, the GRU took funds from DNC donors, using the pretext of a false DNC donations website).

again ... stupid DNC decision to not hand over to proper authorities who could have tracked it all from the get go if it occurred which is not provable because no one in government monitored shit and was hidden by DNC to cover shit up

Articles 35-36: The GRU set up another website, the sole purpose of which was to release stolen DNC documents. They created fake social media accounts that falsely attributed this website's creation to a group of "American hacktivists." It received over 1 million hits.

let freedom ring bitch ... expose them all

Article 37: The GRU has also released stolen documents dating back to 2015 (i.e., they've been up to this for quite a while).

great I wish they had all of the deep states bullshit to display to the world

Article 40: The notion of a "lone Romanian hacker" being responsible for the DNC leaks was a fiction deliberately created by the GRU and disseminated via fake social media accounts.

you mean Seth Rich ? Err Russian hackers

Article 42: Using a popular blogging site, the GRU set up a blog that used the most "searched for" keywords by conspiracy theorists, (e.g., "Illuminati," "Worldwide," "Conspiracy," et. al.), -and used this website to further disseminate the "lone Romanian hacker" conspiracy theory. (Article 46 of the indictment further states that later entries on this blog site posted articles positing that the released, stolen documents had "nothing to do with Russia.")

not provable anything was even hacked again ... but good on Seth rich for getting it out before he was murdered

Article 43, Subsection A: An individual the indictment identifies only as "a known member of congress" contacted an online GRU dummy persona, ("Guccifer 2.0") and requested stolen documents related to their political opponent, and the GRU / "Guccifer" responded by giving said member of congress access to the stolen data they were requesting.

awesome ... at least we know at least one member of congress is a fucking patriot trying to expose truth and fuck the deep state


Article 43, Subsection B: The GRU released stolen documents to what the indictment identifies as "a lobbyist and online source of political news."

if it stinks expose the fuck out of these corrupt bastards

Subsection C: "Guccifer" / The GRU sent stolen documents pertaining to the "Black Lives Matter" movement to a reporter (unidentified in the indictment), to which the reporter not only responded, but offered to write an article using said information.

if it’s true and dirty ... light it up

Article 44: The GRU, posing as "Guccifer 2.0" wrote to a person who was in regular contact with SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. (The indictment includes direct quotes of their online conversation, and this is CLEARLY referring to Roger Stone).

So... if it was not illegal and it was not ... expose the shit

Article 45, subsection B: The GRU, using an alias, contacted a U.S. reporter (unnamed in the indictment) and ultimately gave them access to stolen DNC data.

yeah ummm reporters are always going to leak big fucking bombshells from sources ... if it’s true and shedding light on evil most liberty loving Americans want it exposed by any means needed

Articles 47-49: Here the indictment refers to an organization, identified only as "Organization 1," [I'm thinking, Wikileaks] -which actually reached out to the GRU aliases seeking the stolen emails / data. "Organization 1" is directly quoted by the indictment as having communicated to "Guccifer," that they should "send [Organization 1] any new material [i.e., stolen data] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." Organization 1 was given, and later released, said data, approximately 3 days before the Democratic National Convention. In total, between October and November of 2016, over 50,000 stolen documents were released.

wiki leaks is a godsend to liberty loving citizens of the entire fucking planet ... without them we would know so little about how these fucktard globalists operate ....and you the author obviously are defending the deep state now fuckers and by default you are a globalist fuck face

Articles 50-79 : Lists the counts against the 11 Russian Military Personnel, which include charges of 1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against The United States, 2) Aggravated Identity Theft, 3) Conspiracy to Launder Money [according to the indictment, over 95,000 USD$ was laundered], i.e. using cryptocurrency, that was then use to register domain names, set up websites, create server infrastructure, et. al.,3) The Use of Transferred Money To Commit Crimes Against The United States, 4) General Unlawful Conspiracy [It should be noted that many of these counts have sub-crimes attached to them, such as unlawful hacking, etc.].

the shadow government can make any damn thing they want up and get the MSM to report it then it becomes fact to the sheep .... even if true by some chance ... good on them for exposing the truth of the deep state assholes at work ... and those like you that try to defend said assholes

So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it.