Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,119 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 829,707
Pageviews Today: 1,090,766Threads Today: 266Posts Today: 4,011
09:13 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap

 
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/16/2018 03:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
I am not the person that wrote the analysis, but, it is the first time I have seen it written out.

I thought it was interesting and important for everyone to read.

If you don't agree, well, don't read it.
 Quoting: ladulce


I read it and replied and destroyed it point by point


Propaganda is fucking propaganda whether you read or not ... it still went in your head ... you have to have the intelligence and logic to discern the truth from proganda ... and good propaganda has little seeds of truth thrown in to make it believable
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/16/2018 03:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Guatemala?
Shouldn't you be focusing on sinkholes and Chagas disease. STFU you Democrat plant.
 Quoting: Angryhomo


Dude. Get a freaking life. I am from Wisconsin. Some of us do travel, you know, or are expats? It's a real thing.

Why do all of you morons think that by sharing this I agree with it, anyway?

Aren't we always supposed to know both sides- know your enemies defenses also?

Only on this damn site would sharing information be considered bad. Wow.
 Quoting: ladulce


You can’t ride the fence on explosive shit like this your either for liberty or that filth the writer of this article wrote and I love with the deep state and NWO

So are you buying the bulllshit article or do you denounce it as clear bullshit propagandist crap
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71611133
United States
07/16/2018 03:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
James Dunlap
July 13 at 7:52 PM

Ok, so I've actually sat down and read the entire 29 page Mueller indictment against the 12 Russian intelligence officers, and it is totally insane. I literally can't believe the scope of this thing. I'm making this status public (i.e., shareable), because people need to know about this shit. There is no way you can read the actual indictment and not conclude that 1) there WAS a RUSSIAN conspiracy, 2) that the scope of that conspiracy was GARGANTUAN, 3) that it was organized BY THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT [i.e., there's no way Putin didn't know about this], 4) That people connected to the Trump campaign [and, shockingly, other U.S. Gov't officials] WERE INVOLVED, and 5) this is just the beginning. If Mueller has already uncovered this amount of information with such specificity regarding the goings-on in far-away Russia, there's NO WAY some serious shit isn't going to hit the fan going forward right here in the U.S.

So, without further ado, here are the highlights:

Article 1 of the indictment states that the Russian government actively set up multiple intelligence units (known as the GRU) with the sole aim of interfering with the 2016 election. Two of these units, 26165, and 74455, were specifically tasked with acquiring and releasing stolen documents via hacking.

i think it’s better that the secret bullshit the DNC and Clinton campaign tried to pull is out in the open from Seth rich handing off the “stolen”incriminating evidence ... I also think any college kid with a few semesters of computer science behind them could have hacked Clinton’s bullshit server and the United States is better off having read those disgusting emails

Article 2 specifically calls this a "conspiracy" and states that the 12 indicted Russians had contacts with "persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury."

any so called conspiracy that sheds sunlight and disinfectant on the shadow government secrets is a good thing for the common man

Article 3: The aforementioned Russian intelligence units deliberately targeted the Clinton campaign.

good that evil ass campaign needed to be exposed ... heroes in my book

Article 4: They deliberately targeted the DNC as a whole.

good job on exposing the massive corruption to the American people and world ... also do you not think America is doing the same ass shit all,around the world ... Pot meet Kettle

Article 6: In June of 2016, they released TENS OF THOUSANDS of hacked documents using fictitious online personas.

awesome let freedom fucking ring and expose the deep state ass clowns

Article 10: One of the intelligence officers, Boris Antonov, oversaw a department within 26165 tasked with hacking the U.S. military, governmental (i.e., political) and non-governmental organizations. [i.e., they were spying on every level of our gov't].

Oh dear.. what will we do ... we been doing the same god damn shit to them since 1945 ... you cocksuckers writing this shit must live in a devoid history bubble

Articles 12-18: The Russian hackers often used various online aliases, both male and female, such as (but not limited to) "Kate Milton," "James McMorgans," and "Karen Millen." Sergey Morgachev, another Russian hacker, was a Lt. Colonel in the Russian military. He created the hacking malware used by dept. 26165, known as "X-Agent." Another hacker named in the indictment, Nikolay Kozachek, was a Lt. Captain in the Russian military. Artem Malyshev (also named in the indictment) was a Second Lieutenant in the Russian military. Aleksandr Osadchuk (also named in the indictment) is a Colonel in the Russian Military. He oversaw the creation and dissemination of anti-Clinton material online.

again you don’t think we are doing the same shit all over the world as well as every other country capable of doing such you ignorant fool ? They would be stupid not to...

Article 19: Russian Military Officer Aleksey Potemkin, assigned to 74455, supervised the creation of fake social media accounts used (among other things) in the release of DNC documents.

and yet again you don’t think we are doing the same shit all over the world as well as every other country capable of doing such you ignorant fool ? They would be stupid not to...

Article 21: Over 300 individuals affiliated with the DNC were SUCCESSFULLY targeted. (Article 21 is lengthy, and includes a detailed, play-by-play account of how 26165 and 74455 achieved their aims. Spoiler alert: It's crazy).

aweome... there should have been more from any government or party workers engaged in behavior to fuck over the United States people

Article 24, subsection B: The Russian's hacking of the DNC was so advanced that they were able to monitor individual computers in real time. Subsection C states that their malware sent actual screenshots of DNC computer activity to a server in Arizona that the Russians had access to. They were also able to capture keystrokes entered by DCCC employees.

objection ... you fucking gullible dickwad ... the FBI nor any government agency has ever looked at or had access to any DNC servers to forensically make that claim... that claim is fucking hearsay by a bullshit company hired by the dnc ... don’t be such a gullible indoctrinated ass clown

Article 24, subsection D: They monitored individual DNC / DCCC employees for hours on end, and obtained information about DNC fundraising plans and even banking information (as well as other personal information).

good wish they had monitored more on both sides of aisle if we are stupid enough to toss around sensitive information willy fucking nilly

Article 26 subsection A: By June 2016 the Russians had complete access to 33 DNC computers, totally and completely.

zero fucking chance of knowing that since DNC servers were never forensically looked at but cia nsa fbi etc. and even if they were the DNC I’d fucking stupid with their lax counter measures

Article 27: The GRU gained access to information regarding DNC opposition research, field operation plans, and the Benghazi operation.

bengazi was a fucking disgrace of massive proportion needs to all come out how those men were left to fucking die

Article 28, subsection B: Aside from the server in Arizona, the GRU also stored data to a server in Illinois, to which they filtered large gigabytes of stolen information via a program they developed known as "X-Tunnel."

pot calling kettle black again ... you don’t think every country capable is doing this shit moron.

Article 32: The DNC became aware of Russian attempts to hack their servers and hired a security firm to identify the extent of the intrusions. The security firm (identified in the indictment only as "company 1") also put in place measures to halt GRU access to DNC computers, but, despite this, the GRU was so efficient that they continued to maintain access via "X-Agent" well through October of 2016.

security firm my ass ... if they exist at all they suck at their fucking jobs ... proper protocol was to hand over to fbi and cia and nsa to forensically backtrack but the DNC continues to hide why it didn’t alert and use proper authorities... hiding something of course logic is easy

Article 33: The GRU immediately became aware of "company 1's" (referring here to the security firm that the DNC hired) efforts, and took countermeasures in response. This included investigating / hacking "company 1" itself, and later, apparently as a retaliatory measure against the DNC, setting up a wesbsite that redirected from a DNC online political donations website, to another website set up by the GRU (in other words, the GRU took funds from DNC donors, using the pretext of a false DNC donations website).

again ... stupid DNC decision to not hand over to proper authorities who could have tracked it all from the get go if it occurred which is not provable because no one in government monitored shit and was hidden by DNC to cover shit up

Articles 35-36: The GRU set up another website, the sole purpose of which was to release stolen DNC documents. They created fake social media accounts that falsely attributed this website's creation to a group of "American hacktivists." It received over 1 million hits.

let freedom ring bitch ... expose them all

Article 37: The GRU has also released stolen documents dating back to 2015 (i.e., they've been up to this for quite a while).

great I wish they had all of the deep states bullshit to display to the world

Article 40: The notion of a "lone Romanian hacker" being responsible for the DNC leaks was a fiction deliberately created by the GRU and disseminated via fake social media accounts.

you mean Seth Rich ? Err Russian hackers

Article 42: Using a popular blogging site, the GRU set up a blog that used the most "searched for" keywords by conspiracy theorists, (e.g., "Illuminati," "Worldwide," "Conspiracy," et. al.), -and used this website to further disseminate the "lone Romanian hacker" conspiracy theory. (Article 46 of the indictment further states that later entries on this blog site posted articles positing that the released, stolen documents had "nothing to do with Russia.")

not provable anything was even hacked again ... but good on Seth rich for getting it out before he was murdered

Article 43, Subsection A: An individual the indictment identifies only as "a known member of congress" contacted an online GRU dummy persona, ("Guccifer 2.0") and requested stolen documents related to their political opponent, and the GRU / "Guccifer" responded by giving said member of congress access to the stolen data they were requesting.

awesome ... at least we know at least one member of congress is a fucking patriot trying to expose truth and fuck the deep state


Article 43, Subsection B: The GRU released stolen documents to what the indictment identifies as "a lobbyist and online source of political news."

Subsection C: "Guccifer" / The GRU sent stolen documents pertaining to the "Black Lives Matter" movement to a reporter (unidentified in the indictment), to which the reporter not only responded, but offered to write an article using said information.

Article 44: The GRU, posing as "Guccifer 2.0" wrote to a person who was in regular contact with SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. (The indictment includes direct quotes of their online conversation, and this is CLEARLY referring to Roger Stone).

Article 45, subsection B: The GRU, using an alias, contacted a U.S. reporter (unnamed in the indictment) and ultimately gave them access to stolen DNC data.

yeah ummm reporters are always going to leak big fucking bombshells from sources ... if it’s true and shedding light on evil most liberty loving Americans want it exposed by any means needed

Articles 47-49: Here the indictment refers to an organization, identified only as "Organization 1," [I'm thinking, Wikileaks] -which actually reached out to the GRU aliases seeking the stolen emails / data. "Organization 1" is directly quoted by the indictment as having communicated to "Guccifer," that they should "send [Organization 1] any new material [i.e., stolen data] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." Organization 1 was given, and later released, said data, approximately 3 days before the Democratic National Convention. In total, between October and November of 2016, over 50,000 stolen documents were released.

wiki leaks is a godsend to liberty loving citizens of the entire fucking planet ... without them we would know so little about how these fucktard globalists operate ....and you the author obviously are defending the deep state now fuckers and by default you are a globalist fuck face

Articles 50-79 : Lists the counts against the 11 Russian Military Personnel, which include charges of 1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against The United States, 2) Aggravated Identity Theft, 3) Conspiracy to Launder Money [according to the indictment, over 95,000 USD$ was laundered], i.e. using cryptocurrency, that was then use to register domain names, set up websites, create server infrastructure, et. al.,3) The Use of Transferred Money To Commit Crimes Against The United States, 4) General Unlawful Conspiracy [It should be noted that many of these counts have sub-crimes attached to them, such as unlawful hacking, etc.].

the shadow government can make any damn thing they want up and get the MSM to report it then it becomes fact to the sheep .... even if true by some chance ... good on them for exposing the truth of the deep state assholes at work ... and those like you that try to defend said assholes

So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it.
 Quoting: ladulce



So, there it is folks. This WAS THE ACTIONS OF LIBERTY MINDED FOLKS , fucking the new world order. Not directly linked to Trump but I wish it was so he could go down in history as exposing this trash and evil fucktards in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere in the world. The SOLE AIM TO PRESERVE LIBERTY AND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC ... WE ARE NOT A FUCKING DEMOCRCY FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME .... THERE IS NO WAY AROUND IT.


MY COUNTER ANSWERS TO THE WRITERS OBVIOUS COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IS ABOVE IN BOLD UNDER EACH POINT.

militia
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


Fucking 5 star response right there.

clappa

Far more effort than I would be willing to invest into a BS post like OP posted. I just pointed out what it was. COmplete BS based on the Intel Report released months ago by Republicans that Democrats screeched over.


If people can't connect the fucking dots on this silly indictment scam then I can't help help them and don't want to invest time in educating people who don't want an education.

Props for trying to do so. 3 stars for me, 5 for you.
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/16/2018 04:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Corrected my bold areas
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/16/2018 04:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
This needs to be pinned to expose the leftists point of view
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71611133
United States
07/16/2018 04:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Corrected my bold areas
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


Goofy Thum

Upgraded to 6 stars.
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/16/2018 04:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Also OP ... you got a link to this where it was posted so I can destroy this dude wherever he is posting it ... or did you write it just for here?

Googling only comes up this forum
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71611133
United States
07/16/2018 04:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
This needs to be pinned to expose the leftists point of view
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


It really should.

Pin request added.
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/16/2018 06:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
I am not the person that wrote the analysis, but, it is the first time I have seen it written out.

I thought it was interesting and important for everyone to read.

If you don't agree, well, don't read it.
 Quoting: ladulce


That IS a very good summary.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76460002


It’s a very misleading summary to those with good reasoning and logic skills able to sniff out bullshit
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
Daggo

User ID: 72234993
United States
07/16/2018 06:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Do you realize you can plead whatever you want in an indictment without having to append any evidence to it? That a Grand Jury only sees alleged evidence cherry-picked by the prosecutor and unchallenged by the defence? That none of these allegations have so much as been tested at trial? Quite apart from your deliberately misreading the indictment which makes no allegation any American knew they were dealing with alleged GRU officers or agents.

Didn't think so. Don't apply to law school anytime soon!

sbus

stupthrd

shill

overcap
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76736356


And what if these guys show up for the court hearing like that company on the first 13 did and Muller shit a brick, saying we can't show the evidence because then they will know what and how we found out.

As far as I know that case is going nowhere, just like this would because Muller refuses to show the defence the evidence.

Last Edited by Daggo on 07/16/2018 06:09 AM
:Pirate Flag:

8-14-2018 The day Free Speech died in America
Zark A

User ID: 3232902
United States
07/16/2018 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
James Dunlap
July 13 at 7:52 PM

Article 1 of the indictment states that the Russian government actively set up multiple intelligence units (known as the GRU) with the sole aim of interfering with the 2016 election. Two of these units, 26165, and 74455, were specifically tasked with acquiring and releasing stolen documents via hacking.

so let me see here, 12 hackers, 2 new units, all so they can only get some emails out of Democrat servers? flimsy.

Article 2 specifically calls this a "conspiracy" and states that the 12 indicted Russians had contacts with "persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury."

but conspiracies don't exist to the 'system' that is funny... are the spam emails with attachments to my email account part of a Russian conspiracy against me too?

Article 3: The aforementioned Russian intelligence units deliberately targeted the Clinton campaign.

this is based on one fact only, it is only exploring that side of the aisle...

Article 4: They deliberately targeted the DNC as a whole.

hard to believe, did they hit every state and reps computers too?

Article 6: In June of 2016, they released TENS OF THOUSANDS of hacked documents using fictitious online personas.

why use fake names if you really want to cause trouble?

Article 10: One of the intelligence officers, Boris Antonov, oversaw a department within 26165 tasked with hacking the U.S. military, governmental (i.e., political) and non-governmental organizations. [i.e., they were spying on every level of our gov't].

so what is new here...? why are Democrats and their lax security eg. HRC's handling of emails not at issue here?


Articles 12-18: The Russian hackers often used various online aliases, both male and female, such as (but not limited to) "Kate Milton," "James McMorgans," and "Karen Millen." Sergey Morgachev, another Russian hacker, was a Lt. Colonel in the Russian military. He created the hacking malware used by dept. 26165, known as "X-Agent." Another hacker named in the indictment, Nikolay Kozachek, was a Lt. Captain in the Russian military. Artem Malyshev (also named in the indictment) was a Second Lieutenant in the Russian military. Aleksandr Osadchuk (also named in the indictment) is a Colonel in the Russian Military. He oversaw the creation and dissemination of anti-Clinton material online.

maybe it was Bernie? did you ask him if he ordered this?


Article 19: Russian Military Officer Aleksey Potemkin, assigned to 74455, supervised the creation of fake social media accounts used (among other things) in the release of DNC documents.

oh.. nobody has ever done this before... ooohh.

Article 21: Over 300 individuals affiliated with the DNC were SUCCESSFULLY targeted. (Article 21 is lengthy, and includes a detailed, play-by-play account of how 26165 and 74455 achieved their aims. Spoiler alert: It's crazy).

so tell us: did they get anything good or just hook-up info between HRC and Huma?

Article 24, subsection B: The Russian's hacking of the DNC was so advanced that they were able to monitor individual computers in real time. Subsection C states that their malware sent actual screenshots of DNC computer activity to a server in Arizona that the Russians had access to. They were also able to capture keystrokes entered by DCCC employees.

and the CIA and FBI were doing the same to them at that exact time right? or is it NSA?

Article 24, subsection D: They monitored individual DNC / DCCC employees for hours on end, and obtained information about DNC fundraising plans and even banking information (as well as other personal information).

so this was given to the Republicans and they go their money instead right?

Article 26 subsection A: By June 2016 the Russians had complete access to 33 DNC computers, totally and completely.

and this accomplished what exactly?

Article 27: The GRU gained access to information regarding DNC opposition research, field operation plans, and the Benghazi operation.

and this info went where... maybe it stayed in Russia?

Article 28, subsection B: Aside from the server in Arizona, the GRU also stored data to a server in Illinois, to which they filtered large gigabytes of stolen information via a program they developed known as "X-Tunnel."

if the Russian's used tunneling software to move volumes of data out of DNC servers to other rented? servers in USA, who was tracking data usage and activity logs?

Article 32: The DNC became aware of Russian attempts to hack their servers and hired a security firm to identify the extent of the intrusions. The security firm (identified in the indictment only as "company 1") also put in place measures to halt GRU access to DNC computers, but, despite this, the GRU was so efficient that they continued to maintain access via "X-Agent" well through October of 2016.

company was incompetent, likely political hack appointment

Article 33: The GRU immediately became aware of "company 1's" (referring here to the security firm that the DNC hired) efforts, and took countermeasures in response. This included investigating / hacking "company 1" itself, and later, apparently as a retaliatory measure against the DNC, setting up a wesbsite that redirected from a DNC online political donations website, to another website set up by the GRU (in other words, the GRU took funds from DNC donors, using the pretext of a false DNC donations website).

and their accounting and admin staff did not see this?


Articles 35-36: The GRU set up another website, the sole purpose of which was to release stolen DNC documents. They created fake social media accounts that falsely attributed this website's creation to a group of "American hacktivists." It received over 1 million hits.

where was their buddies.. the social media Co's in not helping with this?

Article 37: The GRU has also released stolen documents dating back to 2015 (i.e., they've been up to this for quite a while).

oh oh.. getting embarrassing now

Article 40: The notion of a "lone Romanian hacker" being responsible for the DNC leaks was a fiction deliberately created by the GRU and disseminated via fake social media accounts.

any I.T. person could figure that out I think

Article 42: Using a popular blogging site, the GRU set up a blog that used the most "searched for" keywords by conspiracy theorists, (e.g., "Illuminati," "Worldwide," "Conspiracy," et. al.), -and used this website to further disseminate the "lone Romanian hacker" conspiracy theory. (Article 46 of the indictment further states that later entries on this blog site posted articles positing that the released, stolen documents had "nothing to do with Russia.")

okay but nobody believes conspiracy theorists anyways right?

Article 43, Subsection A: An individual the indictment identifies only as "a known member of congress" contacted an online GRU dummy persona, ("Guccifer 2.0") and requested stolen documents related to their political opponent, and the GRU / "Guccifer" responded by giving said member of congress access to the stolen data they were requesting.

did this help that person win the election?


Article 43, Subsection B: The GRU released stolen documents to what the indictment identifies as "a lobbyist and online source of political news."

which political party or either can view?

Subsection C: "Guccifer" / The GRU sent stolen documents pertaining to the "Black Lives Matter" movement to a reporter (unidentified in the indictment), to which the reporter not only responded, but offered to write an article using said information.

why does DNC has secret BLM info?

Article 44: The GRU, posing as "Guccifer 2.0" wrote to a person who was in regular contact with SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. (The indictment includes direct quotes of their online conversation, and this is CLEARLY referring to Roger Stone).

did this result in helping Trump Campaign to win?

Article 45, subsection B: The GRU, using an alias, contacted a U.S. reporter (unnamed in the indictment) and ultimately gave them access to stolen DNC data.

was this data published or passed on?

Articles 47-49: Here the indictment refers to an organization, identified only as "Organization 1," [I'm thinking, Wikileaks] -which actually reached out to the GRU aliases seeking the stolen emails / data. "Organization 1" is directly quoted by the indictment as having communicated to "Guccifer," that they should "send [Organization 1] any new material [i.e., stolen data] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." Organization 1 was given, and later released, said data, approximately 3 days before the Democratic National Convention. In total, between October and November of 2016, over 50,000 stolen documents were released.

did this effect outcome at DNC?

Articles 50-79 : Lists the counts against the 11 Russian Military Personnel, which include charges of 1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against The United States, 2) Aggravated Identity Theft, 3) Conspiracy to Launder Money [according to the indictment, over 95,000 USD$ was laundered], i.e. using cryptocurrency, that was then use to register domain names, set up websites, create server infrastructure, et. al.,3) The Use of Transferred Money To Commit Crimes Against The United States, 4) General Unlawful Conspiracy [It should be noted that many of these counts have sub-crimes attached to them, such as unlawful hacking, etc.].

penny anny for a high level Russian op, sounds more like some rogue hacking club to me?


So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it.
 Quoting: ladulce


if this conspiracy is accepted, I cannot wait for all the others to be as well.. you have not proven any links to the Trump campaign here. It did not cause the Democrats to lose the election.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76766795


You are correct. Nothing in the report indicates the Trump organization was involved. OP's hate for Trump is evident in his analysis.

Thank heaven Killary was not elected.
Zark
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76360250
United States
07/16/2018 08:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Nothing of substance in this thread.
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72048686
United States
07/17/2018 03:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 29 page Mueller indictment detailed by James Dunlap
Nothing of substance in this thread.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76360250


Then you didn’t read the comments
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind





GLP