Never-before seen photos of the moon landing

The "Dust" was one of the great anomalies...

The Cosmic Dust deposit controversy.

Dust is continuously deposited every day, every year 24/7 on anything with gravitational pull.

It put a serious clamp on "Evolution".

The "Evolution" scientists believed that "Billions" or hundreds of "Millions" of years of Cosmic Dust should create a blanket of something like 10-15 feet thick...

Yet when they cored down into the surface it was only 4 to 6 inches in depth.

And they encountered an impenetrable layer beneath the dust.

Impenetrable with the coring tools they brought with them anyway...

Those astronauts beat the crap out of those tools trying to get a core, and were only partially successful.

Why?
.

Since other people do are you legally blind or merely hysterically blind?

What would be your conspirafantasy explanation for the absence of the shadow be anyway?
They did the photoshoot without a flag prop and pasted the flag into the thousands of images that show it?

RLY!?


Are you aware that the apperent size of an object in a photograph depends on the focal length of the lens used?
[link to www.google.nl (secure)]

Are you aware of anything that has to do with actual reality?




Wow!
World-class moran right here.




Sorry, buddy.
Creation "science" doesn't qualify as grown-up people science.

The shadow from the astronaut is falling from left to right. I see no such shadow for the flag or flagpole. Perhaps you could put a circle round it, or a big red arrow pointing to it?

Now, THAT was a good one!

[link to spaceflight.nasa.gov (secure)]
The astronaut's shadow is going to the right. All of his shadow that is in the frame is the legs. All of the shadow of the flag in the frame is a thin line from the flagpole as the shadow of the flag itself is out of the frame to the right. It is barely visible above the shadow of the legs and is easier seen if zoomed in.

Sorry, buddy.
Creation "science" doesn't qualify as grown-up people science.

Your blather doesn't explain the dust Urban Mythbuster?

You Flat-Earth, Moon-Hoax-Tards are annoying at best.
.

How is that not your problem?

If YOU want to build a case based on X not existing than YOU will HAVE TO PROVE X doesn't exist.

"I can't see X" isn't prove of anything.
Particularly when others have no problem seeing X.




As I said: trolls are useless.

Even most creationists know how stupid the lunar dust argument is.
[link to rationalwiki.org (secure)]
Congratulations, you're dumber than an average creationist.

I always wondered if Armstrong was cold when walking on the moon. Its -127C at night. I mean you watch Russians at -50 in Siberia and they are always cold no matter what they put on. I wonder how much did that suit gave comfort. Was he cold or cozy warm jumping around. There's no wind I know but -127C is still coooold.

he was primarily in the Sun. A vacuum has no temperature.
the suit was heavily insulated so that IIRC the primary source of heat was from their own bodies and they had to remove excess heat with the ice sublimators of the PLSS.