|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Anyone want to talk crustal displacement yet?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
FrankSki |
|
Post Content
|
This video always blows my mind.
Thank you Louis. I love sharing ideas with great minds. You presented some excellent photographic evidence in your post to back up the discussion. Thanks.
I lean towards slippage over impact. The reason is the geographic change of the north pole as it relates to the land masses around it. if it were just random impacts then the land masses would never have moved to that degree. maybe slightly, but to move 90 degrees in some iterations is quite a stretch for an impact.
Quoting: FrankSki I too had considered posting a shorter video of the 'old equator', so have done so and embedded yours. [ link to www.youtube.com (secure)] I do not for a moment consider it mere chance that the sites: Giza Petra Persepolis Mohenjo-daro Ankor Wat Aneityum Island Easter Island The Nazca Lines Machu Picchu All lie within 30 KM of what would have been the old equator. Thank you for a great thread, 'left some green for you too! I'm right on board with you Luis. But now that we got that out of the way, what we the purpose of all these structures and what do the lay lines of the Earth have to do with it?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
