Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,393 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 457,476
Pageviews Today: 739,390Threads Today: 274Posts Today: 5,459
12:58 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77336308
Australia
02/13/2019 10:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
DGN.. why do mammal embryos like humans form yolk sacs? We aren't birds. Yet we have three different sets of genes in our DNA for creation of yolk sacs.

[link to embryology.med.unsw.edu.au (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Embryos require them like you stated.
"In mammals the yolk sac acts as a source of primordial germ cells and blood cells."
 Quoting: DGN


You continually try to debunk you`re own made up version of evolution in the hope that it means sky daddy must be real.

GLP`S biggest fool
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75719647
United States
02/13/2019 10:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...

"Animals without umbilical cords evolved into animals with umbilical cords"
Explain the invention of the chord and how an embryo can live without it. Your obscure magic 'E' word connects zero dots and there is no mechanism in nature to account for for such incredible technology.
 Quoting: DGN


How can an embryo live without it? The same way they do today. Not all animals have umbilical cords.

How did it come about? I haven't done any research into this, but I'll tell you what I know.

The umbilical cord attaches an embryo to the placenta in mammals. Evidence suggests that mammals evolved from reptiles in the Triassic. The first mammals laid eggs, like modern montremes (platypus and echidnas). After this, Therian mammals appear, which no longer lay eggs. Then Therians diverge into two groups, marsupials (which have a yolk sac, rather than a placenta) and placental mammals.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481

Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point?
 Quoting: DGN


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


In reality it is futile to talk to DGN about this. He is a cult member who believes evolution is from Satan.

I was raised in that cult and laughed at evolutionists myself until college when I took biology courses and followed up with my own reading.




As pointed out by Dawkins, creationist think life around them is too complex to have evolved without a designer. Yet uncritically they accept the existence of an all powerful all intelligent being that is far more complex than any life on earth. And that far more complex being exists without a designer itself according to their beliefs.

Really? Lol
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/13/2019 10:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...

"Animals without umbilical cords evolved into animals with umbilical cords"
Explain the invention of the chord and how an embryo can live without it. Your obscure magic 'E' word connects zero dots and there is no mechanism in nature to account for for such incredible technology.
 Quoting: DGN


How can an embryo live without it? The same way they do today. Not all animals have umbilical cords.

How did it come about? I haven't done any research into this, but I'll tell you what I know.

The umbilical cord attaches an embryo to the placenta in mammals. Evidence suggests that mammals evolved from reptiles in the Triassic. The first mammals laid eggs, like modern montremes (platypus and echidnas). After this, Therian mammals appear, which no longer lay eggs. Then Therians diverge into two groups, marsupials (which have a yolk sac, rather than a placenta) and placental mammals.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481

Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point?
 Quoting: DGN


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


"according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them."
Congratulations, theory confesses fact, yes every creature is deliberately intelligently designed and assembled according to it's genetic blueprints, not random chance mindless train wreck mutation which can only make tumor blobs of useless cells.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75719647
United States
02/13/2019 10:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


How can an embryo live without it? The same way they do today. Not all animals have umbilical cords.

How did it come about? I haven't done any research into this, but I'll tell you what I know.

The umbilical cord attaches an embryo to the placenta in mammals. Evidence suggests that mammals evolved from reptiles in the Triassic. The first mammals laid eggs, like modern montremes (platypus and echidnas). After this, Therian mammals appear, which no longer lay eggs. Then Therians diverge into two groups, marsupials (which have a yolk sac, rather than a placenta) and placental mammals.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481

Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point?
 Quoting: DGN


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


"according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them."
Congratulations, theory confesses fact, yes every creature is deliberately intelligently designed and assembled according to it's genetic blueprints, not random chance mindless train wreck mutation which can only make tumor blobs of useless cells.
 Quoting: DGN


JFC you have no clue what evolution is about.

Random chance is NOT apart of evolution. No biologist ever says it is. Only ignorant creations who do not understand evolution.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75719647
United States
02/13/2019 10:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
DGN, you seem to think all mutations are bad. What about TRIM5 in two separate species of monkeys? Through a mutation, the TRIM5 protein was able to merge with Cyclophilin A. The results of this mutation were the development of TRIM5-CypA which offered better protection in these monkeys from retroviruses.

A mutation improving survival. Evolution.

[link to www.pnas.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75814481
Australia
02/13/2019 10:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


How can an embryo live without it? The same way they do today. Not all animals have umbilical cords.

How did it come about? I haven't done any research into this, but I'll tell you what I know.

The umbilical cord attaches an embryo to the placenta in mammals. Evidence suggests that mammals evolved from reptiles in the Triassic. The first mammals laid eggs, like modern montremes (platypus and echidnas). After this, Therian mammals appear, which no longer lay eggs. Then Therians diverge into two groups, marsupials (which have a yolk sac, rather than a placenta) and placental mammals.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481

Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point?
 Quoting: DGN


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


"according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them."
Congratulations, theory confesses fact, yes every creature is deliberately intelligently designed and assembled according to it's genetic blueprints, not random chance mindless train wreck mutation which can only make tumor blobs of useless cells.
 Quoting: DGN


Evolution theory suggests that every species of modern placental mammal always had umbilical cords, but their distant ancestors (who were a different species) did not have umbilical cords. That does not imply they were made out of dirt.

Do you understand what I'm saying? Evolution theory doesn't state that a modern species of embryo was waiting around for millions of years for an umbilical cord to evolve. Likewise, humans always had eyes. Humans weren't waiting around for eyes to evolve, because their primate ancestors always had them, so the first humans were already born with eyes.

I know you don't agree with evolution theory, but do you at least understand what I'm saying?
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/14/2019 12:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...

Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point?
 Quoting: DGN


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


"according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them."
Congratulations, theory confesses fact, yes every creature is deliberately intelligently designed and assembled according to it's genetic blueprints, not random chance mindless train wreck mutation which can only make tumor blobs of useless cells.
 Quoting: DGN


JFC you have no clue what evolution is about.

Random chance is NOT apart of evolution. No biologist ever says it is. Only ignorant creations who do not understand evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Evolution is a supercilious science fiction Frankenstein hoax claiming mindless cell replication failure mutation is the intelligence creating biological precision form and function, rather than deformed dysfunctional blobs. This is intellectual contempt for science and superior intelligence
stars

Last Edited by DGN on 02/14/2019 12:12 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75719647
United States
02/14/2019 01:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


"according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them."
Congratulations, theory confesses fact, yes every creature is deliberately intelligently designed and assembled according to it's genetic blueprints, not random chance mindless train wreck mutation which can only make tumor blobs of useless cells.
 Quoting: DGN


JFC you have no clue what evolution is about.

Random chance is NOT apart of evolution. No biologist ever says it is. Only ignorant creations who do not understand evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Evolution is a supercilious science fiction Frankenstein hoax claiming mindless cell replication failure mutation is the intelligence creating biological precision form and function, rather than deformed dysfunctional blobs. This is intellectual contempt for science and superior intelligence
stars
 Quoting: DGN


There is no intelligence behind evolution. That is one of your many flawed assumptions about intelligence.

Ask yourself if a bacteria is too complicated to be formed without intelligent design thus requiring a designer, then how could possibly an all powerful intelligent God exist?

That is an even bigger gap that needs to be explained.
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/14/2019 01:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


"according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them."
Congratulations, theory confesses fact, yes every creature is deliberately intelligently designed and assembled according to it's genetic blueprints, not random chance mindless train wreck mutation which can only make tumor blobs of useless cells.
 Quoting: DGN


JFC you have no clue what evolution is about.

Random chance is NOT apart of evolution. No biologist ever says it is. Only ignorant creations who do not understand evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Evolution is a supercilious science fiction Frankenstein hoax claiming mindless cell replication failure mutation is the intelligence creating biological precision form and function, rather than deformed dysfunctional blobs. This is intellectual contempt for science and superior intelligence
stars
 Quoting: DGN


There is no intelligence behind evolution. That is one of your many flawed assumptions about intelligence.

Ask yourself if a bacteria is too complicated to be formed without intelligent design thus requiring a designer, then how could possibly an all powerful intelligent God exist?

That is an even bigger gap that needs to be explained.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647

Because you can't identify the intelligent designer of a bacteria, you deny it happened claiming mud pies got electrocuted by lighting and spontaneously formed into living cells and you call this science?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75719647
United States
02/14/2019 01:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


JFC you have no clue what evolution is about.

Random chance is NOT apart of evolution. No biologist ever says it is. Only ignorant creations who do not understand evolution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Evolution is a supercilious science fiction Frankenstein hoax claiming mindless cell replication failure mutation is the intelligence creating biological precision form and function, rather than deformed dysfunctional blobs. This is intellectual contempt for science and superior intelligence
stars
 Quoting: DGN


There is no intelligence behind evolution. That is one of your many flawed assumptions about intelligence.

Ask yourself if a bacteria is too complicated to be formed without intelligent design thus requiring a designer, then how could possibly an all powerful intelligent God exist?

That is an even bigger gap that needs to be explained.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647

Because you can't identify the intelligent designer of a bacteria, you deny it happened claiming mud pies got electrocuted by lighting and spontaneously formed into living cells and you call this science?
 Quoting: DGN


No one can identify an intelligent designer. There isn't one. You are only a Christian because of the time and place of your birth as it is a part of the culture around you.

No one believes mud pies were electrocuted spontaneously creating living cells. All you have is an attack on an experiment performed 67 years ago.

You ridicule science but unquestioningly believe in a creator that you 1) can't explain 2) have no real evidence even exists.
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/14/2019 01:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


Evolution is a supercilious science fiction Frankenstein hoax claiming mindless cell replication failure mutation is the intelligence creating biological precision form and function, rather than deformed dysfunctional blobs. This is intellectual contempt for science and superior intelligence
stars
 Quoting: DGN


There is no intelligence behind evolution. That is one of your many flawed assumptions about intelligence.

Ask yourself if a bacteria is too complicated to be formed without intelligent design thus requiring a designer, then how could possibly an all powerful intelligent God exist?

That is an even bigger gap that needs to be explained.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647

Because you can't identify the intelligent designer of a bacteria, you deny it happened claiming mud pies got electrocuted by lighting and spontaneously formed into living cells and you call this science?
 Quoting: DGN


No one can identify an intelligent designer. There isn't one. You are only a Christian because of the time and place of your birth as it is a part of the culture around you.

No one believes mud pies were electrocuted spontaneously creating living cells. All you have is an attack on an experiment performed 67 years ago.

You ridicule science but unquestioningly believe in a creator that you 1) can't explain 2) have no real evidence even exists.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Your stone age failure to express gratitude for your own creator, crediting mindless random chance train wreck mutation for the malfunction of your depression, is intellectual frustrated under achiever's contempt for superior intelligence.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75719647
United States
02/14/2019 02:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


There is no intelligence behind evolution. That is one of your many flawed assumptions about intelligence.

Ask yourself if a bacteria is too complicated to be formed without intelligent design thus requiring a designer, then how could possibly an all powerful intelligent God exist?

That is an even bigger gap that needs to be explained.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647

Because you can't identify the intelligent designer of a bacteria, you deny it happened claiming mud pies got electrocuted by lighting and spontaneously formed into living cells and you call this science?
 Quoting: DGN


No one can identify an intelligent designer. There isn't one. You are only a Christian because of the time and place of your birth as it is a part of the culture around you.

No one believes mud pies were electrocuted spontaneously creating living cells. All you have is an attack on an experiment performed 67 years ago.

You ridicule science but unquestioningly believe in a creator that you 1) can't explain 2) have no real evidence even exists.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Your stone age failure to express gratitude for your own creator, crediting mindless random chance train wreck mutation for the malfunction of your depression, is intellectual frustrated under achiever's contempt for superior intelligence.
 Quoting: DGN


Simple question. Prove God exists, and not just any God, the Christian God.

I see a world where over 99% of the species that have ever lived are extinct. If that is the product of intelligent design, then that designer is quite flawed due to the extraordinary failure rate, which ruins a lot of claims of God.

The percentage of species that have gone extinct however is explained brilliantly by natural selection.

You keep claiming evolution is random. It is far from random.

I find it bizarre, bordering on insanity someone would keep arguing against a topic they do not even have the lowest foundational knowledge in.
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/14/2019 02:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...

Because you can't identify the intelligent designer of a bacteria, you deny it happened claiming mud pies got electrocuted by lighting and spontaneously formed into living cells and you call this science?
 Quoting: DGN


No one can identify an intelligent designer. There isn't one. You are only a Christian because of the time and place of your birth as it is a part of the culture around you.

No one believes mud pies were electrocuted spontaneously creating living cells. All you have is an attack on an experiment performed 67 years ago.

You ridicule science but unquestioningly believe in a creator that you 1) can't explain 2) have no real evidence even exists.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Your stone age failure to express gratitude for your own creator, crediting mindless random chance train wreck mutation for the malfunction of your depression, is intellectual frustrated under achiever's contempt for superior intelligence.
 Quoting: DGN


Simple question. Prove God exists, and not just any God, the Christian God.

I see a world where over 99% of the species that have ever lived are extinct. If that is the product of intelligent design, then that designer is quite flawed due to the extraordinary failure rate, which ruins a lot of claims of God.

The percentage of species that have gone extinct however is explained brilliantly by natural selection.

You keep claiming evolution is random. It is far from random.

I find it bizarre, bordering on insanity someone would keep arguing against a topic they do not even have the lowest foundational knowledge in.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647

Very honest expression I agree that's intellectual contempt for superior intelligence. Species live for their specific function in the biosphere and die off. Now show me your phantom delusion of mindless 'natural selection' writing DNA blueprints creating any new species.
stars

Last Edited by DGN on 02/14/2019 02:25 AM
AC
User ID: 77365803
United States
02/14/2019 03:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
"...the thing is . . . you see what you want to see and you hear what you want to hear - dig. Did you ever see Paris?" - Oblio said, "No". "Did you ever see New Dehli?" - Oblio said "Well, no". "Well that's it - you see what you want to see and you hear what you want to hear", said the Rock Man and with that the Rock Man fell soundly asleep...." ~~~~ and although you don't think so, you've got a point. Right on your head. Willful ignorance is mental-masturbation for dogmatists. These threads you post are wholly for your own personal self gratification and do not glorify God in the least. FD&S is no way to go through life, son.
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/14/2019 10:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


How can an embryo live without it? The same way they do today. Not all animals have umbilical cords.

How did it come about? I haven't done any research into this, but I'll tell you what I know.

The umbilical cord attaches an embryo to the placenta in mammals. Evidence suggests that mammals evolved from reptiles in the Triassic. The first mammals laid eggs, like modern montremes (platypus and echidnas). After this, Therian mammals appear, which no longer lay eggs. Then Therians diverge into two groups, marsupials (which have a yolk sac, rather than a placenta) and placental mammals.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481

Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point?
 Quoting: DGN


It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't.
Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals.

[link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)]

The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence.

My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


In reality it is futile to talk to DGN about this. He is a cult member who believes evolution is from Satan.

I was raised in that cult and laughed at evolutionists myself until college when I took biology courses and followed up with my own reading.




As pointed out by Dawkins, creationist think life around them is too complex to have evolved without a designer. Yet uncritically they accept the existence of an all powerful all intelligent being that is far more complex than any life on earth. And that far more complex being exists without a designer itself according to their beliefs.

Really? Lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647

Dawkin's scientifically illiterate pout is a misery loves company ploy by an unthankful tantruming hollow depressed soul expressing intellectual contempt for intelligence superior to his own.
"For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who are suppressing the truth in an unrighteous way, 19 because what may be known about God is clearly evident among them, for God made it clear to them. 20 For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable. 21 For although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasonings and their senseless hearts became darkened. 22 Although claiming they were wise, they became foolish 23 and turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and birds and four-footed creatures and reptiles." Ro1:18

"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77275768
United States
02/14/2019 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
There are 2 possibilities why OP keeps posting the same BS month after month, year after year.

#1 It's that time of the month when OP needs his Jehovah Witness quota points.

#2 OP has a severe and incurable case of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD).


Or is the belief of JW,founded by the false prophet Charles Taze Russell, by definition OCD.

Hmmmm..... Maybe it's one and the same.
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/14/2019 12:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
There are 2 possibilities why OP keeps posting the same BS month after month, year after year.

#1 It's that time of the month when OP needs his Jehovah Witness quota points.

#2 OP has a severe and incurable case of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD).


Or is the belief of JW,founded by the false prophet Charles Taze Russell, by definition OCD.

Hmmmm..... Maybe it's one and the same.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77275768


There are two possibilities why evolutionists persist in their
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
, promoting a science fiction theory with zero fossil trail evidence, as Professor Darwin admitted;

#1 Having been coned by trusted 'educators' into believing such sci-FY superstition all their lives, they're pride is past the point of no return.

#2 Insisting mindless mutation, cell replication failure, rewrites creatures genetic assembly blueprints resulting in upwardchanges until all their cells/organs are transformed into an entirely new improved species rather than a deformed dysfunctional blob.
Why? This provides a "I didn't know, nobody told me" disclaimer on judgement day to escape going to hell, which doesn't exist it's religion's ultimate blasphemy for driving it's victims into chursh for pa$$ing the plate.

Either way the scientifically/spiritualy illiterate evolutionists remains caught alive in the devil's deceptions, which are one in the same..
devil6

Last Edited by DGN on 02/14/2019 12:27 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77301333
Belgium
02/17/2019 09:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...

Because you can't identify the intelligent designer of a bacteria, you deny it happened claiming mud pies got electrocuted by lighting and spontaneously formed into living cells and you call this science?
 Quoting: DGN


No one can identify an intelligent designer. There isn't one. You are only a Christian because of the time and place of your birth as it is a part of the culture around you.

No one believes mud pies were electrocuted spontaneously creating living cells. All you have is an attack on an experiment performed 67 years ago.

You ridicule science but unquestioningly believe in a creator that you 1) can't explain 2) have no real evidence even exists.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Your stone age failure to express gratitude for your own creator, crediting mindless random chance train wreck mutation for the malfunction of your depression, is intellectual frustrated under achiever's contempt for superior intelligence.
 Quoting: DGN


Simple question. Prove God exists, and not just any God, the Christian God.

I see a world where over 99% of the species that have ever lived are extinct. If that is the product of intelligent design, then that designer is quite flawed due to the extraordinary failure rate, which ruins a lot of claims of God.

The percentage of species that have gone extinct however is explained brilliantly by natural selection.

You keep claiming evolution is random. It is far from random.

I find it bizarre, bordering on insanity someone would keep arguing against a topic they do not even have the lowest foundational knowledge in.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


And then we have this cure for cancer showing up.

'There is death, thus there is no such thing as a god'.



If evolution is not random, then why is randomness mentioned in every definition of evolution theory since it was concocted? We would love to hear from you again soon.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40169223
United States
02/17/2019 10:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
How did Caterpillars which metamorph into Moths or Butterflies evolve?

A creature that literally transforms into another creature.
How did that occur through evolution naturally?
DGN  (OP)

User ID: 76673672
United States
02/17/2019 10:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
...


No one can identify an intelligent designer. There isn't one. You are only a Christian because of the time and place of your birth as it is a part of the culture around you.

No one believes mud pies were electrocuted spontaneously creating living cells. All you have is an attack on an experiment performed 67 years ago.

You ridicule science but unquestioningly believe in a creator that you 1) can't explain 2) have no real evidence even exists.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


Your stone age failure to express gratitude for your own creator, crediting mindless random chance train wreck mutation for the malfunction of your depression, is intellectual frustrated under achiever's contempt for superior intelligence.
 Quoting: DGN


Simple question. Prove God exists, and not just any God, the Christian God.

I see a world where over 99% of the species that have ever lived are extinct. If that is the product of intelligent design, then that designer is quite flawed due to the extraordinary failure rate, which ruins a lot of claims of God.

The percentage of species that have gone extinct however is explained brilliantly by natural selection.

You keep claiming evolution is random. It is far from random.

I find it bizarre, bordering on insanity someone would keep arguing against a topic they do not even have the lowest foundational knowledge in.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75719647


And then we have this cure for cancer showing up.

'There is death, thus there is no such thing as a god'.



If evolution is not random, then why is randomness mentioned in every definition of evolution theory since it was concocted? We would love to hear from you again soon.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77301333

Like you just said evolution isn't science it's a science fiction concocted theory with zero fossil trails of even one single species turning into a different one.